All Advertisers
| All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
 New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
28th March 2006
| #1 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 226
Thread Starter | Rosetta 200 + RME Fireface = Lynx Aurora 8?? I wanted to see if Aurora 8 would have the connectivity of the Fireface and conversion quality of the rosetta. Tx |
|  |
|
28th March 2006
| #2 |
| Lives for gear  Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 2,825
| divide the connections you see in this graphic by 2. thats the connectivity of the Aurora 8 http://www.lynxstudio.com/aurora/BKFrame.html dsub analog in/out, dsub digital in/out, and wordclock i/o, midi i/o for updates. ADAT for the Lynx is another $225 and there is no firewire card yet. so i'd say that the Fireface has more connectivity. Conversion is better than Rosetta IMO. I own an Aurora 16 with LT-ADAT.
__________________  |
|
| |
|
28th March 2006
| #3 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 226
Thread Starter | You are saying that fireface conversion is better than rosetta or lynx conversion is better than rosetta? tx |
|
| |
New Reply 
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Lynx Aurora vs Rosetta 800 | dreamsongs | So much gear, so little time! | 40 | 15th November 2009 08:27 PM |
| Lynx L22 vs. Aurora 8, RME fireface, etc. | chipwits | Music computers | 15 | 19th July 2007 10:06 PM |
| fireface 800 to lynx aurora | SAGABEBA | High end | 16 | 4th July 2006 03:17 AM |
| Rosetta 200 or Rme Fireface??? | Harsh | Low End Theory | 22 | 26th May 2006 09:39 PM |
| RME AES32 + Lynx Aurora 16 | natpub | So much gear, so little time! | 3 | 30th December 2005 09:57 PM |
| |
