New Intel Macs Running WinXP - How-To... - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Music computers


New Intel Macs Running WinXP - How-To...

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 23rd March 2006   #1
Lives for gear
 
junior's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,078

Thread Starter
New Intel Macs Running WinXP - How-To...

not sure if this has been posted here yet, but someone has found a way to install a dual-boot os x / win xp system on the new intel macs. looks pretty slick...

video: http://macbreak.libsyn.com/
instructions: http://wiki.onmac.net/index.php/HOWTO

have any of you intel mac guys tried this yet? if so, have you tried using any hardware, audio apps or plugins under winxp?
__________________
"Creativity is allowing yourself to make mistakes. Art is knowing which ones to keep"...
--Scott Adams
junior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th March 2006   #2
Gear addict
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 324

I just did the install of XP on my Core Duo mini. So far all audio stuff works. I'm using an Emagic EMI 6|2 USB interface and have been running Ableton Live. The mini outperforms a 3.0ghz P4! And running Live in OSX vs Windows on the same hardware shows a performance difference of about 2% in favor of Windows... Pretty great overall though! Gonna install Nuendo later tonight and see how far I can push the machine...

...and this is only the 1.66ghz CoreDuo!!
kenn.michael is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th March 2006   #3
Lives for gear
 
junior's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,078

Thread Starter
wow, that's what i was hoping to hear... definitely, post back when you've checked out nuendo...
junior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th March 2006   #4
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 582

personally i would rather spend the money on building a kit with a quad dual core mobo and just put xp pro on that.

http://www.supermicro.com/Aplus/moth...rce/H8QC8+.cfm
dj_who is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th March 2006   #5
Lives for gear
 
junior's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,078

Thread Starter
that's fine, assuming you only want to run windows... of course, there are a lot of folks who'd like one box to do both...
junior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th March 2006   #6
Lives for gear
 
Joined: May 2004
Location: canada
Posts: 3,998

junior...
and maybe even linux as well as win and mac.
check out knoppix sometime.
some interesting linux audio software is coming along.
check out ferventsoftware.com sometime.
has anyone tried linux on the new mac intels ??
__________________
i'm just a dumb computer engr (ret'd)...."quantum computing is the future"
running a native software studio daw...Powertracks and Reaper on amd.
new cockney album released http://therockingbloodbrothers.blogspot.com/
my other little songs www.motagator.com/bmanning
manning1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th March 2006   #7
Lives for gear
 
junior's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,078

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by manning1
junior...
and maybe even linux as well as win and mac.
check out knoppix sometime.
some interesting linux audio software is coming along.
check out ferventsoftware.com sometime.
has anyone tried linux on the new mac intels ??
excellent point! i downloaded a few linux distros but haven't gotten around to checking them out yet...

any tips or suggestions?
junior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th March 2006   #8
Lives for gear
 
Joined: May 2004
Location: canada
Posts: 3,998

junior...
all the linux distros are at www.distrowatch.com
i'm playing with knoppix right now.
a nice small one is damnsmalllinux.org
you might want to check with the creator of each distro on its status
for mac intels.
one of the big popular linux distros is ubantu.
dynebolic and fervent ....particularly the latter are multimedia and recording type distros. ardour and rosegarden are linux audio and midi packages.
linux audio is certainly coming along. but they arent up to the level of what i'm currently useing from my investigations. but they ARE coming on strong.

i reckon 2 more years and linux will be a serious possibility for audio and midi recording. from what i see ardour is trying to be the pro tools competitor for linux.
peace.
manning1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th March 2006   #9
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 2,709

why would you want to pay for overpriced mac hardwear and stick windows on it its just crazy and expencive

linux has a long way to go to be a platform of choice for audio and i dont think it ever get there. frankly i would rather run BSD or Darwin they are much better OS than windows or linux
aussie_techie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th March 2006   #10
Gear Head
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Location: London
Posts: 33

I think its all about running it the other way around, its all about getting OSX to work on a PC, if thats even possible, it should be now that they both use the same processor's.

That way you can build a sick machine capable of running both OS's without paying over the odds on a new Intel Mac which would still be less powerfull.

I wonder if anyone knows how to get that to run?

Please get in touch!
TooledUp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th March 2006   #11
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 2,709

Quote:
Originally Posted by TooledUp
I think its all about running it the other way around, its all about getting OSX to work on a PC, if thats even possible, it should be now that they both use the same processor's.

That way you can build a sick machine capable of running both OS's without paying over the odds on a new Intel Mac which would still be less powerfull.

I wonder if anyone knows how to get that to run?

Please get in touch!
its possible but not legal or compleatly stable last i saw but it will be in time. your hardware options are limited, unless you use the workarounds (not compleatly stable) you need an intel processor with SSE3
aussie_techie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th March 2006   #12
Lives for gear
 
abit's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 825

MAC OSintel was hacked on the next day after release,
and installed on regular PC..
Apple made a big scandal out of it.

I was thinking the opposite way-
this would be very beneficial for Apple to sell not just a hardware with OS,
but let people use OSIntel on regular PC.
This would make Bill really nervous.
That would be a killer.
abit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th March 2006   #13
Lives for gear
 
junior's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,078

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by aussie_techie
why would you want to pay for overpriced mac hardwear and stick windows on it its just crazy and expencive
i know what you're saying... but, those little mac minis are pretty inexpensive.
junior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th March 2006   #14
Lives for gear
 
junior's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,078

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by TooledUp
I think its all about running it the other way around, its all about getting OSX to work on a PC, if thats even possible, it should be now that they both use the same processor's.
hmmm, a quick google search turned up this link:
http://osx86.theplaceforitall.com/howto/

looks interesting too...
junior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th March 2006   #15
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 526

Quote:
Originally Posted by TooledUp
That way you can build a sick machine capable of running both OS's without paying over the odds on a new Intel Mac which would still be less powerfull.
LMAO!
RadioMoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th March 2006   #16
Lives for gear
 
theother's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 2,089

Quote:
Originally Posted by dj_who
personally i would rather spend the money on building a kit with a quad dual core mobo and just put xp pro on that.

http://www.supermicro.com/Aplus/moth...rce/H8QC8+.cfm

absolutely!

why go though the trouble and install WinXP on a Mac?? And it's slower.

I don't need 2 OS's. One is enough trouble!
theother is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th March 2006   #17
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 2,709

i think some people liek to spend more money (assuming they they buying legal software) just because they can do it
aussie_techie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th March 2006   #18
Gear addict
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 324

Quote:
Originally Posted by junior
wow, that's what i was hoping to hear... definitely, post back when you've checked out nuendo...
installed Nuendo last night.

runs GREAT!!!!!

haven't run benchmark songs yet, but I opened a few of my sessions and everything was very smooth with tons of CPU headroom.

even though video drivers aren't native yet (meaning Windows isn't doing accelerated video using the video card's hardware), redraws were fast and smooth. as fast and smooth as I've seen on any PC... in the case of Nuendo, faster than redraws on my G5.
kenn.michael is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th March 2006   #19
Gear addict
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 324

Quote:
Originally Posted by junior
i know what you're saying... but, those little mac minis are pretty inexpensive.
true... yes the mini running the Core Duo at 1.66ghz is not the fastest version of the chip, but the MacBook Pro at 2.16ghz has been benchmarked as the fastest laptop mac or PC.

what's really going to be interesting is when the Apple towers are released, they will have the fastest chips and motherboards Intel has to offer. if Intel's new Conroe chips beat AMD, then we have some of the fastest hardware on the mac (along with the PC manufacturers who will be using the same stuff)...

i think the argument about slower performance on mac is going to be moot...

on my tests running the same software on the same hardware in both OSes, the performance was pretty identical 0-2% difference... and that was on a beta version of the software (the only cross platform Universal Binary audio workstation that I have access to).

yes, you can build PCs for cheaper, but I don't think that the Macs just being slower argument is going to continue to hold water too much longer. we're all using the same hardware now! (with the exception of those who run AMDs! )
kenn.michael is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Intel based MACS, should I fear the change? jgrif08 Music computers 13 6th July 2006 10:02 AM
Parallels - Runs WinXP on Intel Macs WITHOUT Dual-Booting junior Music computers 3 9th April 2006 10:40 AM
Holy Crap! Macs Running Windows! JSAudioTN So much gear, so little time! 85 8th April 2006 01:23 AM
What is it about the Intel Macs that.... FunkFaker Music computers 9 11th March 2006 10:27 PM
2 MACS 1 for recording, 1 for running softsyths? Mr. Nice So much gear, so little time! 10 29th September 2003 02:46 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:12 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.