![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2005 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,078
Thread Starter | New Intel Macs Running WinXP - How-To...
not sure if this has been posted here yet, but someone has found a way to install a dual-boot os x / win xp system on the new intel macs. looks pretty slick... video: http://macbreak.libsyn.com/ instructions: http://wiki.onmac.net/index.php/HOWTO have any of you intel mac guys tried this yet? if so, have you tried using any hardware, audio apps or plugins under winxp?
__________________ "Creativity is allowing yourself to make mistakes. Art is knowing which ones to keep"... --Scott Adams |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 324
|
I just did the install of XP on my Core Duo mini. So far all audio stuff works. I'm using an Emagic EMI 6|2 USB interface and have been running Ableton Live. The mini outperforms a 3.0ghz P4! And running Live in OSX vs Windows on the same hardware shows a performance difference of about 2% in favor of Windows... Pretty great overall though! Gonna install Nuendo later tonight and see how far I can push the machine... ...and this is only the 1.66ghz CoreDuo!! |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2005 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,078
Thread Starter |
wow, that's what i was hoping to hear... definitely, post back when you've checked out nuendo... |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2005 Location: PA, USA
Posts: 582
|
personally i would rather spend the money on building a kit with a quad dual core mobo and just put xp pro on that. http://www.supermicro.com/Aplus/moth...rce/H8QC8+.cfm |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2005 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,078
Thread Starter |
that's fine, assuming you only want to run windows... of course, there are a lot of folks who'd like one box to do both... |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2004 Location: canada
Posts: 3,998
|
junior... and maybe even linux as well as win and mac. check out knoppix sometime. some interesting linux audio software is coming along. check out ferventsoftware.com sometime. has anyone tried linux on the new mac intels ??
__________________ i'm just a dumb computer engr (ret'd)...."quantum computing is the future" running a native software studio daw...Powertracks and Reaper on amd. new cockney album released http://therockingbloodbrothers.blogspot.com/ my other little songs www.motagator.com/bmanning |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2005 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,078
Thread Starter | Quote:
any tips or suggestions? | |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2004 Location: canada
Posts: 3,998
|
junior... all the linux distros are at www.distrowatch.com i'm playing with knoppix right now. a nice small one is damnsmalllinux.org you might want to check with the creator of each distro on its status for mac intels. one of the big popular linux distros is ubantu. dynebolic and fervent ....particularly the latter are multimedia and recording type distros. ardour and rosegarden are linux audio and midi packages. linux audio is certainly coming along. but they arent up to the level of what i'm currently useing from my investigations. but they ARE coming on strong. i reckon 2 more years and linux will be a serious possibility for audio and midi recording. from what i see ardour is trying to be the pro tools competitor for linux. peace. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2004 Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 2,709
|
why would you want to pay for overpriced mac hardwear and stick windows on it its just crazy and expencive linux has a long way to go to be a platform of choice for audio and i dont think it ever get there. frankly i would rather run BSD or Darwin they are much better OS than windows or linux |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear Head Joined: Mar 2006 Location: London
Posts: 33
|
I think its all about running it the other way around, its all about getting OSX to work on a PC, if thats even possible, it should be now that they both use the same processor's. That way you can build a sick machine capable of running both OS's without paying over the odds on a new Intel Mac which would still be less powerfull. I wonder if anyone knows how to get that to run? Please get in touch! |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2004 Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 2,709
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2005 Location: NY
Posts: 825
|
MAC OSintel was hacked on the next day after release, and installed on regular PC.. Apple made a big scandal out of it. I was thinking the opposite way- this would be very beneficial for Apple to sell not just a hardware with OS, but let people use OSIntel on regular PC. This would make Bill really nervous. That would be a killer. |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2005 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,078
Thread Starter | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #14 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2005 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,078
Thread Starter | Quote:
http://osx86.theplaceforitall.com/howto/ looks interesting too... | |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 526
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #16 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2004 Location: London, UK
Posts: 2,089
| Quote:
absolutely! why go though the trouble and install WinXP on a Mac?? And it's slower. I don't need 2 OS's. One is enough trouble! | |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2004 Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 2,709
|
i think some people liek to spend more money (assuming they they buying legal software) just because they can do it
|
| | |
| | #18 | |
| Gear addict Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 324
| Quote:
runs GREAT!!!!! haven't run benchmark songs yet, but I opened a few of my sessions and everything was very smooth with tons of CPU headroom. even though video drivers aren't native yet (meaning Windows isn't doing accelerated video using the video card's hardware), redraws were fast and smooth. as fast and smooth as I've seen on any PC... in the case of Nuendo, faster than redraws on my G5. | |
| | |
| | #19 | |
| Gear addict Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 324
| Quote:
what's really going to be interesting is when the Apple towers are released, they will have the fastest chips and motherboards Intel has to offer. if Intel's new Conroe chips beat AMD, then we have some of the fastest hardware on the mac (along with the PC manufacturers who will be using the same stuff)... i think the argument about slower performance on mac is going to be moot... on my tests running the same software on the same hardware in both OSes, the performance was pretty identical 0-2% difference... and that was on a beta version of the software (the only cross platform Universal Binary audio workstation that I have access to). yes, you can build PCs for cheaper, but I don't think that the Macs just being slower argument is going to continue to hold water too much longer. we're all using the same hardware now! (with the exception of those who run AMDs! | |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New Intel based MACS, should I fear the change? | jgrif08 | Music computers | 13 | 6th July 2006 10:02 AM |
| Parallels - Runs WinXP on Intel Macs WITHOUT Dual-Booting | junior | Music computers | 3 | 9th April 2006 10:40 AM |
| Holy Crap! Macs Running Windows! | JSAudioTN | So much gear, so little time! | 85 | 8th April 2006 01:23 AM |
| What is it about the Intel Macs that.... | FunkFaker | Music computers | 9 | 11th March 2006 10:27 PM |
| 2 MACS 1 for recording, 1 for running softsyths? | Mr. Nice | So much gear, so little time! | 10 | 29th September 2003 02:46 PM |
| |