Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Music computers

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Terk $50 multiband compressor !?!?! Bob Ross New product alert! 3 29th January 2006 06:50 AM
Drawmer S3 Multiband Compressor Unbound New product alert! 5 30th September 2005 05:26 PM
Best (digital) multiband compressor Lagerfeldt High end 6 27th February 2005 05:48 PM
Multiband Compressor Revelation High end 10 21st December 2004 06:23 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 17th March 2006, 11:36 AM   #1
pingu
Lives for gear
 
pingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth Australia
Posts: 665
Best multiband compressor plugs

What are some of your favourite mb comps that youve come across over the years.



Cheers chaps.
pingu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th March 2006, 12:45 PM   #2
kudzu
Lives for gear
 
kudzu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scotland UK
Posts: 707
I've really got to grips with UAD-1 Multiband ... Likin' it ... In fact their mastering series is very good indeed ....
kudzu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th March 2006, 05:53 PM   #3
True North
Lives for gear
 
True North's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Richmond Hill, Ontario (Canada)
Posts: 2,478
Wave Arts
Multidynamics (version is 5 is well done)

Sonalksis has two 'like' products
CQ1 Multi-Band Compander

DQ1 Dynamic Equaliser

Both have different names but based on the same principles as a Multiband compressor

Good news is that both companies offer 30 day demo times - so download away
__________________
"In the time of chimpanzees I was a monkey" - Beck, Loser

"I do use compressors/limiters but not for controlling dynamics, I use EQ for that!" Jp22 (damn I miss him)

"Education is a progressive discovery of our own ignorance." -- Will Durant, historian (1885-1981)

"I try to get a boom out of the bass drum, in one of my albums, my CD, boom, I try to get that big boom, I could not get a big boom, I paid bucks, and could not get the boom" - Recording Expert, Tad Donley
True North is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17th March 2006, 06:11 PM   #4
AlexLakis
Lives for gear
 
AlexLakis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD/L.A.
Posts: 3,612
UAD-1 Multiband by far, and yes, their mastering series rules.

Was using the L3 before this.

Also, way back in the day, I was liking Sonitus' Multiband. Never hear about them on this board, tho, people must not like them very much.
AlexLakis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th March 2006, 06:17 PM   #5
MASSIVE Master
Lives for gear
 
MASSIVE Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Chicago (Schaumburg / Hoffman Est.) IL
Posts: 1,616
Send a message via AIM to MASSIVE Master
UAD's MBC pretty much rocks, but I pretty much don't care for "maul-the-band" compression unless something gets really whacky...

It makes a wonderful frequency-concsious gate though... Really nice.
__________________
John Scrip - Massive Mastering - www.massivemastering.com

Spoon-feed a newb some answer and he'll mix for a day -
Get him to *think* about it and figure it out for himself and he'll mix for a lifetime.
MASSIVE Master is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th March 2006, 06:41 PM   #6
3rd world order
Lives for gear
 
3rd world order's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: ann arbor, michigan
Posts: 1,948
Send a message via ICQ to 3rd world order Send a message via AIM to 3rd world order Send a message via MSN to 3rd world order Send a message via Yahoo to 3rd world order
McDSP M2000 is cool for making pumpy squashed digital drum sounds... but i would never think of using it for mastering.
__________________
3WO - Mixing Without Tears

"Tape is a mangler.." -- Slipperman // "The idea of the perfect album is this amorphous thing we're always aiming at. For us, it can mean something full of imperfection. Part of our aim has always been to destroy the sound in a beautiful way. It doesn't mean we expect everyone would like it. I'm not sure we will ever get there... but the whole point of making music is at least to aim at your own idea of perfection." -- Boards of Canada
3rd world order is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th March 2006, 06:56 PM   #7
feyshay
Lives for gear
 
feyshay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,273
It really depends on what you are using it for.
Voxengo's Soniformer has up to 32 bands if you like. Meant for mastering.

If you want clean, I'd go for that Sonalksis one mentioned above.

If you don't mind some coloration, I think it is hard to beat Vintage Warmer. I love this plug-in. It'll give you 3 bands, which should be enough.

If you want to separate your bands by amplitude rather than by frequency, check out Neodynium by Elemental Audio. You can do some funky things with that.
feyshay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th March 2006, 08:11 PM   #8
BorrelNote
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 167
UAD Precision Multiband....by far...
BorrelNote is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th March 2006, 08:33 PM   #9
Lagerfeldt
Lives for gear
 
Lagerfeldt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 2,573
I prefer the Waves Linear Phase Multiband and the Sonalksis "minimum-phase" DQ-1.

You can do some nice low level comp/upward comp with both, but using the Sonalksis DQ-1 first for low level/upward (1-2 dB max.) and the Waves MB afterwards for "normal" compression (2-3 dB max.) can yield some amazing results. I find this combo brings out inner detail and stereo perception (Sonalksis) plus control and some extra loudness (Waves MB). Of course I follow up with broadband hardware compression and limiting.

While it may sound counter intuitive to have MB upward compression or expansion followed by MB downward compression, it's not necessarily in conflict due to the different places of compression in terms of level (low level vs. peak). I also sometimes use the upper bass band and air band for expansion instead of compression, I find the upper bass expansion can increase punch and avoid mud, while the air band expansion seems to have a psycho acoustic effect on the perceived amount of compression (sort of tricking the ears into believing you're actually compressing less overall).

The L3 limiter is multiband but not compression as such. And it stinks, IMO.
__________________

Producer & engineer
Apple Certified Trainer in Logic Pro

Popmusic.dk
Production

Hit Kit V3 Sample CD
Urban & Electronic Beat Production - used on Billboard #1 hits (recently on: Katy Perry, Britney, Usher, Jordin Sparks, Leona Lewis, Sugababes, The Pussycat Dolls)
Lagerfeldt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th March 2006, 08:55 PM   #10
Max headroom
Gear addict
 
Max headroom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 309
my opinion

1. MD3 ...... for Po Co

2. Vintage Warmer

3. UAD multiband


but apart from first one , I don't like using them much


Cheers


Max
Max headroom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th March 2006, 09:26 PM   #11
Cornvalley
Gear addict
 
Cornvalley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Woodland Hiils, CA
Posts: 347
Yeah, the MD3 is very helpful. MS control is it's strength aside from the flawless sound.
Cornvalley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2006, 01:47 AM   #12
papiel
Gear nut
 
papiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 93
The Sonalksis CQ-1 is the only MB I really use. I don't use MB on mix bus, only on individual tracks and the CQ-1 really helps when it comes to bass (straitening the subs and the low mids) and vocals.
I'm beginning to understand how UAD's PMB is working so I might use it a bit more now...
papiel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2006, 06:15 AM   #13
pingu
Lives for gear
 
pingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth Australia
Posts: 665
Cool stuff guys.


Thanks
pingu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2006, 02:30 PM   #14
pingu
Lives for gear
 
pingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth Australia
Posts: 665
Does the uad mb compressor require a dsp card?
pingu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2006, 10:51 PM   #15
johnnyvince
Gear Head
 
johnnyvince's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 71
Yeah, you need a UAD-1 DSP card (PCI) to run the Precision Multiband, and a stereo instance eats up about half a card (mono instance does use only about a quarter of a card, unlike some of their other plugs where mono uses as much DSP as stereo). If you don't already own a UAD-1, you'd be looking at about $650 total ($399 for the card, plus $249 for the Precision Multiband plug). Slightly pricey...but you may likely only be using the Multiband on finished 2-track mixes, an could use the DSP to run other plug-ins beforehand. I own 2 UAD-1's including the Ultra-Pak, and cannot recommend this combination enough. Although it's more $$ up front, it's also much more cost-effective not to do buy a la carte, an their premium modeled plug-ins are phenomenal!

I only used the Precision Multiband during the two week demo period. Two things: first, I think it sounds great in action and gives you a ridiculous amount of control over dynamics and tonal balance. Too bad it looks prettiest only when it's mauling your mix. Second, there is a mild yet perceptible loss of sheen on the very top end, even with all bands set to unity, and all thresholds maxxed so that they don't engage...what's up with that? If it were an analog piece, I'd expect some coloration, but it's digital. Maybe it's 'modeled' after 5 LA-2A's or 1176's strapped across 5 bands? Maybe it's due to crossover anomolies between bands (they would still be active). Maybe all of the above. I don't know, I'm just guessing. Anyway, the only reason I haven't bought it is that I still suffer from an old war wound the doctors call 'Finalizer-Shock-Syndrome'.
johnnyvince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2006, 10:56 PM   #16
johnnyvince
Gear Head
 
johnnyvince's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 71
One more thing: if you live in the U.S., I recommend calling Chuck Levin's in Wheaton, MD. They're cool (most of the time), and they'll hook you up. (301) 946-8808.
johnnyvince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st March 2006, 12:59 PM   #17
ResonantFilter
Gear nut
 
ResonantFilter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oxford
Posts: 106
Another hit for MD3 - absolutely stonking!
__________________
Long-time lurker finally putting head above the parapet...

be gentle
ResonantFilter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st March 2006, 02:18 PM   #18
max cooper
Lives for gear
 
max cooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: tx
Posts: 8,819
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max headroom
my opinion

1. MD3 ...... for Po Co

2. Vintage Warmer

3. UAD multiband

The Vintage Warmer has multiband mode, and I use it a heck of a lot, but I don't consider it a Multi-band compressor like the MC2000 is (which I also use a lot).

To me, the VW is a single-band comp/limiter with some multiband parameters.

But I do like 'em both.
max cooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st March 2006, 02:23 PM   #19
dub3000
Gear nut
 
dub3000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 100
the free mda multiband vst up at http://www.mda-vst.com can do some wonderful things to drum sounds. but if you run more than one at a time, the software freaks out in horrible ways.

sounds great though.
dub3000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st March 2006, 03:03 PM   #20
feyshay
Lives for gear
 
feyshay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,273
Quote:
Originally Posted by max cooper
The Vintage Warmer has multiband mode, and I use it a heck of a lot, but I don't consider it a Multi-band compressor like the MC2000 is (which I also use a lot).

To me, the VW is a single-band comp/limiter with some multiband parameters.

But I do like 'em both.
True with Vintage Warmer. You do not have individual band controls for release, speed, etc. You have 3 "bands", whose crossover points are controlled and then decibel level are controlled. You also can modulate the saturation for each band.
feyshay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st March 2006, 09:38 PM   #21
Jonboy79
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St. Louis MO
Posts: 2,202
I have to also vote for the Wave Arts Multidynamcs5, surprisingly good and way way better than any of their version 4 stuff.
Jonboy79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st March 2006, 09:49 PM   #22
ShamansDream
Gear addict
 
ShamansDream's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 384
The UI on the Waves processors is probably the best but considering the WUP factor, I am getting use to Izotope Ozone 3.
4 (or less) bands, linear phase or analog option included.

This one goes on the best value list and is fully functional.
ShamansDream is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0