![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| #Of Mac Pro's In Nodes = The Processing Power Of Pro Tools|HD (Hardware)7 Accel? | Rob G | High end | 12 | 29th August 2006 06:45 PM |
| 002 Rack help please | MACHINE | Music computers | 0 | 23rd March 2006 02:39 AM |
| how much processing power do i need? | c.dizzle | Music computers | 5 | 25th February 2005 09:21 AM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 41
| worried about processing power w/002 rack hi guys, i'm using an amd 4200 with 2 gig ram and looking at a 002 rack. know it's like how long is a piece of string but what will this pc be like with protools? ie - can handle say 15 tracks for a 3 minute song with some plugins etc? i've got a mate with a mini mac that struggles with say 10 tracks with plugins. just trying to get a general feel! thanks |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 2,099
| 1st of all have you checked the compatability documents, if not go do it now assuming everything is compatable your system will be fine. realy what do you expect from a mac mini |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 153
| I had a 002r and 15 tracks should be no problem at all........ With the type of machine(computer) you said you have..... Plug-ins however behave differently..... some are more cpu taxing as other are not.... Also ln pro tools you can set up fx channels and send your particular track at different levels to your effects as oppose to the many guys i've heard of trying to put 10 different effects on each individual track....... Hope that helps... Dr. Clisby |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2004 Location: canada
Posts: 3,234
| somethings really wrong cruz if you cant run a boatload of tracks. how much memory ya got ?? hard drive big cache ??
__________________ i'm just a dumb computer engr (ret'd)...."quantum computing is the future" running a native software studio daw...Powertracks and Reaper on amd. my little songs www.motagator.com/bmanning (saving up for pristine ADA convertors i cant afford...lol) |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 41
| thanks for the replies guys. sorry i must clarify that i don't have the mac mini, i've got an amd 4200 with 2 gig ram and 3 hd's (80, 120 and 300 gig). i haven't got the 002 rack yet but was just checking that it'd work fine etc. sounds like it should be ok though. haven't really had much experience with protools so will have to suss out how intensive some of the plugins are etc (i've used sonar for the last coupla years!) |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 152
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: St. Louis MO
Posts: 2,230
| I constantly run up to 32 tracks on my Imac G5 with lots of plug ins. That machine, assuming its compatable, should be able to handle just about as much as you can throw at it, ofcourse besides the usual suspects like reverbs. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 5,994
| As others have suggested, once you get plugs into the equation, there's little proper comparative quantifying that can be done... (unless you also start specifying exactly what plugs are on what machine). I could probably run 100 or more instances of some plugs but three or four instances of some convo reverbs would bring my little system whimpering to its knees. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: St. Louis MO
Posts: 2,230
| Just remember once you got the sound with the plug you want, AudioSuite is your friend for saving processing power. Just AS the plug right to the track and you've saved yourself a boat load of cpu power, of course depending on what plug your using. Generally with eq's and compression I can use as many as I want, but once I start getting into reverbs is choke city. Never slowed me down though. |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 391
| The AMD processors have been kickin' butt and taking names to boot. An OO2 should perform perfecly. The sinlg eprocessor P4's have been a great disappointment due to the lack of hypertheading support. This has been resolved in PTLE v7. Go to the DUC and read up on it: Digidesign User Conference (DUC) |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |