black lion tweaked 828 vs apogee ensemble - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Music Computers

black lion tweaked 828 vs apogee ensemble
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 9th February 2011   #1
Gear nut
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 100

Thread Starter
black lion tweaked 828 vs apogee ensemble

i have a motu 828 and am not massivly happy with the a-d, d-a conversion (the whole process, not the converters) it seems that the converters are good but the rest of the signal path has been constructed on a tight budget.. clock etc.

does anyone here have any experience with black lion? a modded 828 maybe? and do any tech heads have any opinions on how a tweaked 828 may compare to an apogee ensemble, sound quality/conversion wise?

seelink: Black Lion Audio | MOTU Audio Interfaces

generally, i come out of the box with a drum/bass mix just to add a tad of tube and or desk preamp drive and eq. i may then do similar with the master, so my drum mix will ultimatly leave and re enter the box twice. i am trying to maintain strong, sharp transients and avoid any blurring.

*any* help would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks!
cupid stunt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10th February 2011   #2
Gear nut
 
CSeye's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 87

I have a Black Lion modified 828 mkll and an Ensemble.

The BLA mod for the 828 does sound tighter and more open than the factory sound. But, no way will it sound better than an Apogee!

If money is tight, then the BLA mod is a good option. What really counts is the quality of your recording environment, your mics and mic technique, the condition of your drums, your playing ability, etc.
__________________
i5 MPB (8GB) 10.8.3, Mac Pro 1,1 (13GB) 10.7.5, UAD2 Quad Apollo & Satellite, Blue Sky Media Desk, L9.1.8, DP 8, C7, LGX-SA, GI-20, JTV-69, Komplete 8, HALion 4.5, M5v3, etc
CSeye is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10th February 2011   #3
Gear nut
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 100

Thread Starter
thanks for the reply, difficult to better it as you have both
i am seriously concidering both options as an upgrade but the ensemble would have to be a conciderable improvement on the BLA to justify the £.

just to put it into context for me to understand.. if you were to score the ensemble 10, what would you give the standard 828 and the bla 828?

i produce electronic music but like to run my completed drum mix through my desk, just to give it a subtle, glued analogue feel. i have snappy/attacky drums and feel that after iv past the drum mix through the desk, followed by the whole master, that iv blured the edges of the transients of my drums slightly.. they seem not as defined/clear(if that makes sence )

will the 828 mod improve this situation and only allow noticable colouration from desk, not the conversion process?

thanks again!
cupid stunt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12th February 2011   #4
Gear nut
 
CSeye's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 87

The Ensemble captures a sense of air that is missing with either stock or modded 828.

If the Ensemble is a 10, then the stock 828 is 6-7 and the BLA mod is 8.

From your description, your drum transients get blurred passing through the desk. Drums are sharp before the mixer and then dulled coming out? Are you clipping in the mixer?

You don't mention if you're using compression (plug-in or hardware)

Why not use something like NomadFactory Magnetic, or PSP Mix Saturator for analog warmth. Or a vintage compressor plug-in with slow attack to allow the transients to pass through without being squashed???

That's all I have to offer.

Best
CSeye is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12th February 2011   #5
Lives for gear
 
richgilb's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Location: hull
Posts: 1,168

Quote:
Originally Posted by CSeye View Post
I have a Black Lion modified 828 mkll and an Ensemble.

The BLA mod for the 828 does sound tighter and more open than the factory sound. But, no way will it sound better than an Apogee!

If money is tight, then the BLA mod is a good option. What really counts is the quality of your recording environment, your mics and mic technique, the condition of your drums, your playing ability, etc.
Did you get the clock from BLA to go with this mod? I did and my MOTU 896HD went from a 6 to a 9.5 in my opinion (against a Focusrite Liquid's 10!)
richgilb is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12th February 2011   #6
Gear nut
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 100

Thread Starter
thanks cseye! i do very slightly clip the mixer, not for distortion but to scrub off the sharpest of peaks. the way i work tho, i have a very busy, multilayered drum mix with heavily comped kicks and snares.. the rest of the mix i do not comp pre desk leaving my ghost snares peaking higher than my k+S. so i suppose im knocking these down a bit, while grouping everything through a stereo channel. i then notice very slight loss of attack in my k+S before compression and limiting in the box. i just pressumed the innacuracies within the 828 signal chain conversion process was causing the problem.
thanks for ur input and suggestions for plugs to try. i think il get the 828 modded, as the ensemble is a little out of my league atm.


@richgilb
is the clock the external seperate box? how does it work in conjunction with the 828? simply plug and play?(sorry im not very knowlegable with clocks and interfaces) will it make a fairly large difference in my conversion?
thanks!
cupid stunt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12th February 2011   #7
Gear nut
 
CSeye's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 87

Quote:
Originally Posted by richgilb View Post
Did you get the clock from BLA to go with this mod? I did and my MOTU 896HD went from a 6 to a 9.5 in my opinion (against a Focusrite Liquid's 10!)
No, just the analog upgrade.
CSeye is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12th February 2011   #8
Gear nut
 
CSeye's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 87

Quote:
Originally Posted by cupid stunt View Post
thanks cseye! i do very slightly clip the mixer, not for distortion but to scrub off the sharpest of peaks. the way i work tho, i have a very busy, multilayered drum mix with heavily comped kicks and snares.. the rest of the mix i do not comp pre desk leaving my ghost snares peaking higher than my k+S. so i suppose im knocking these down a bit, while grouping everything through a stereo channel. i then notice very slight loss of attack in my k+S before compression and limiting in the box. i just pressumed the innacuracies within the 828 signal chain conversion process was causing the problem.
thanks for ur input and suggestions for plugs to try. i think il get the 828 modded, as the ensemble is a little out of my league atm.
I think you also need to rethink what you're doing that's producing dulled transients. That's not an "audio interface quality" issue. A higher end interface will only make this problem "more visible" unless you change how you process and channel the audio.

Go for the BLA mod (including the clock as recommended above). They're very nice folks to work with.
CSeye is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12th February 2011   #9
Lives for gear
 
richgilb's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Location: hull
Posts: 1,168

Quote:
Originally Posted by cupid stunt View Post
is the clock the external seperate box? how does it work in conjunction with the 828? simply plug and play?(sorry im not very knowlegable with clocks and interfaces) will it make a fairly large difference in my conversion?
thanks!
yes external, it just plugs into the back of the interface, I then tell Logic to use this clock in preferences and away I go. it adds a certain depth and space that is very appealing to the ear. There is some debate about it though. You sometimes see them going cheap on ebay and on here I think. You could get the mod and then wait for a used one?
richgilb is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2011   #10
soulstudios
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Another happy BLA modder here. The before and after for the mod was massive (I tested). The before and after for the ext clock was small, but clearly noticeable. Having both virtually negated the need for my monitor eq unit. Both are worth having, but if you're on a tight budget just do the mod and forget about the clock.
 
Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2011   #11
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 252

i find apogee stuff to be coloured.
RANTARAVE is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 15th February 2011   #12
Gear nut
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 100

Thread Starter
thanks for all the replys g-slutz! i think im gunna go for the mod and clock.. when i connect it physically, does the motu automaticaly recocnise and sync to it? how do i tell logic to use new clock?

cheers!
cupid stunt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 15th February 2011   #13
Gear nut
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 124

well BLA mod on the 002/003 was mainly for people who wanted to use protools with good conversion, basically just a dongle with acceptable ad/da. now that pro tools has gone native.. i really see this fading out.
there are much better options available now.
bleep is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 15th February 2011   #14
soulstudios
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Quote:
Originally Posted by cupid stunt View Post
thanks for all the replys g-slutz! i think im gunna go for the mod and clock.. when i connect it physically, does the motu automaticaly recocnise and sync to it? how do i tell logic to use new clock?

cheers!
You tell the motu to use the external clock via the motu control panel.
 
Reply With Quote
Old 15th February 2011   #15
Gear nut
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 100

Thread Starter
thanks soulstudios.. 1st button i pressed ('setup') brought up the selection .
is there anything to do in logic afterwards as richgilb suggests? i couldnt see anything to do with clocking...
cupid stunt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 15th February 2011   #16
Lives for gear
 
johndykstra's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,739

you need to verify that it's conversion that is causing what you don't like. I would run a simple test, tracks out loop tracks back in. If you hear the transient truncation, then you are correct. If you don't, it's time to rethink your mixer clip or compression techniques...cabling.... Just a thought.

FWIW, I opened this thread to gain insight to modding my 24i/o...possibly. Looking forward to hear it'd be worth it.
__________________
phantom power doesn't make your voice sound spooky

Here's what I do. Free if you like, pay if you REALLY like:

http://midwestdeathrattle.bandcamp.com/
johndykstra is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 16th February 2011   #17
Lives for gear
 
richgilb's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Location: hull
Posts: 1,168

Quote:
Originally Posted by cupid stunt View Post
thanks soulstudios.. 1st button i pressed ('setup') brought up the selection .
is there anything to do in logic afterwards as richgilb suggests? i couldnt see anything to do with clocking...
If I remember you tell Logic to use word clock, not motu...
richgilb is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13th March 2011   #18
Gear interested
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5

Will the analog upgrade mod on the 828 give me anything more if I'm using outboard gear plugged into the "non-Preamp" inputs. I know they upgrade all the chips, but since I won't be using any extra amplification, will the chips really cut into the tone that much? I know the wordclock is a good investment because the stock clock can have all sorts of jitter issues, but if all my analog is done through a good pre-amp, will passing it through the stock analog really clutter it up that bad?

-Jimmy
SuprchrgedSi is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 15th March 2011   #19
Lives for gear
 
Piedpiper's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Location: Between the Notes, Iowa
Posts: 2,591

the amount of gain is not the factor. That it goes through it is.
Piedpiper is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 15th March 2011   #20
Gear interested
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5

I just thought that if you're not using the gain capabilities of the chip, less of the unwanted effects would come through, so sending a line level signal would have less problems with the "haze" that appears. Of course, I have never had a chance to try out the high end stuff. It's just what I deduced from that lack of experience.

Do the motu mods have any consideration given to the conversion section? I seem to have gotten conflicting answers from different forum searches? Is that why they offer the discount on the clock, to address these deficiencies?

-Jimmy
SuprchrgedSi is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 15th March 2011   #21
Lives for gear
 
Piedpiper's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Location: Between the Notes, Iowa
Posts: 2,591

BLA is a phone call away...
Piedpiper is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 15th March 2011   #22
Gear nut
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 100

Thread Starter
everything in the analogue path is changed for the better. so yes is the answer to your 1st q.
the converters are the strongest link in 828s signal path. the conversion process is let down by the clock and the remaining signal path components.
cupid stunt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2011   #23
Gear interested
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 7

motur 2408mk3 mod

hi gs's. I realize this thread is older but can someone tell me what good it would do me to have the modification + clock done to my 2408mk3 when I am using a focusrite octopre.
jnwry is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Black Lion Mod Apogee Ensemble ! Derrick02045 So much gear, so little time! 36 18th January 2013 03:34 AM
black lion tweaked 828 vs apogee ensemble cupid stunt So much gear, so little time! 0 9th February 2011 06:08 PM
Black Lion Modded MOTU 896HD or Apogee Ensemble IPLayHamers So much gear, so little time! 8 13th February 2010 04:54 AM
Black Lion 002 Signature v. Apogee Ensemble...? k.online So much gear, so little time! 24 25th December 2009 07:48 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:17 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.