Word length & (native) DAW signal flow questions - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Music computers


Word length & (native) DAW signal flow questions

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 30th December 2005   #1
Lives for gear
 
ttauri's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Knife, Fork, Bottle, Cork
Posts: 761

Thread Starter
Word length & (native) DAW signal flow questions

Coupla questions:

First just to verify: my understanding of 32-bit processing is that if you take, say, a 16bit file, drop the channel fade and raise the master fader an identical amount, you've still got all your bits. Correct?

However, what happens to word length when a plug-in is inserted? Is it processed as 32-bit, or is it only converted to 32 when it's getting routed by the mixer?

And what I'm particularly wondering about: what's the status of word length in a softsampler? If you attenuate a sample within a softsampler, what's output into the DAW?

Peece,
T. Tauri
ttauri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th December 2005   #2
Lives for gear
 
John The Cut's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 841

Send a message via MSN to John The Cut
My understanding is that the DAW does all its processing at 32bit float regardless of bit-depth of recorded material. I think this is true for CubaseSX.

If a plug-in uses 64bit internal then it must dither back to 32bits before delivering audio to the mixer.

In answer to your first question - I'm not sure.. I think on a channel, if you pull down a fader, you are losing resolution - this lower resoultion is then delivered to the mix buss, so if you raise the master fader you are simply amplifying a low res signal.

This is why many engineers who work ITB prefer to keep the channel faders at maximum resolution and adjust the mix volume using the master fader.

Dont quote me on this
John The Cut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th December 2005   #3
Lives for gear
 
Lagerfeldt's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 4,770

Quote:
Originally Posted by mogWai

This is why many engineers who work ITB prefer to keep the channel faders at maximum resolution and adjust the mix volume using the master fader.

Dont quote me on this
I'm quoting you... and I don't agree :-)

Actually it's better to avoid slamming the buses too hard, this is what sometimes causes ITB mixes to collapse.

But you should *also* be conservative with the channels and internal headroom in most plug-ins.

Generally speaking you will achieve more open and warm results by NOT trying to squeeze everything up to 0dBFS in all parts of the chain but instead mixing so your peak is around -6dBFS to -3dBFS on the master bus without attenuation.

BTW: any process will expand the bits no matter what.
__________________


Professional geek


Online Mastering


-
At the moment: Mastering Christopher (EMI) ยท Mixing Michalis (Universal)
Lagerfeldt is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Neve 8058 Signal Flow mandanclan High end 8 28th November 2011 10:50 AM
Any limit on length of BNC-to-BNC word clock cable? Mike H Geekslutz forum 2 1st November 2009 05:22 AM
<Hustle & Flow> Mic ozramidi Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 17 18th August 2006 07:13 PM
Weak link in my signal flow... D/A? proxy So much gear, so little time! 9 22nd September 2005 05:38 AM
What is...the best NATIVE DAW overall? JBRecording Music computers 0 3rd September 2005 02:52 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:55 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.