![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2002 Location: NYC
Posts: 1,123
Thread Starter | Digi 002 Conversion vs RME ADI-8?
Good Day and Happy Healthy New Year to All!!! I'm in the process of doing some upgrades to my project studio. Currently, I'm using a Digi 001 (though completelely bypassing this box). I'm using an RME ADI-8 "Pro" via ADAT Lightpipe for hardware i/o (Reverb, STC-8, etc...) and the Kurzweil Rumour for A/D (mics/direct lines). I'm interested in switching over to a Digi 002 and Apogee Rosetta 800 w/Big Ben. So my question is: How does the RME's conversion stack up (literally....multi-tracks, that is...) to the 002s? I'd be using the Apogee for the most important stuff and the 002 for harware i/o only. My other option is to keep everything as is and just ad a Rosetta 200/Big Ben (via spdif) for the important stuff. I'm also considering the UA Audio 2192 for conversion & clock duties. So can anyone with realworld experience concerning these items please chime in on the quality of these potential choices? Thanks a TON man!!!! |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| RME ADI 2 against 002 | brokemusician4 | Low End Theory | 5 | 15th June 2006 11:58 PM |
| RME ADI-8 DD & ADI-192 DD | Almost Human | So much gear, so little time! | 4 | 25th January 2006 07:44 PM |
| Digi 002 vs. RME Fireface/ Apogee | cbgb-nyc | So much gear, so little time! | 2 | 7th October 2005 04:21 AM |
| |