All Advertisers
| All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Where are the free Rtas plugins for PC and my Rtas to VST conveter never worked | Big a dog | Music computers | 2 | 22nd March 2007 01:20 PM |
| best rtas plugins in the industry!?! | saikit_2003 | Low End Theory | 24 | 25th June 2006 12:58 AM |
 |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
9th December 2005, 06:00 PM
| #1 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Music City
Posts: 337
|  Sony EQ for RTAS or URS plugins? Which you y'all prefer and why? Thanks.
__________________ "Polishing turds is worlds cheaper today but it's really hard to call that progress."-Bob Olhsson |
|  |
|
9th December 2005, 06:21 PM
| #2 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: NYC, NY
Posts: 625
| I use the TDM versions of those you mention and wouldn't give up either one. They're both very different and very useful. The URS eqs are great, the Sony is probably a bit more flexible however. And if you get the Sony, opt for the GML eq as well. A true gearslut would have both 
__________________ - Jan Folkson www.janfolkson.com If you can't make it good, the least you can do is make it perfect. |
|
| |
|
10th December 2005, 10:12 AM
| #3 |
| Moderator  Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Boston,MA Providence,RI
Posts: 10,436
| They're both great, but I couldn't live without the URS plug's....  |
|
| |
|
10th December 2005, 04:55 PM
| #4 |
| Gear addict  Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Kansas City
Posts: 478
| This is Gearslutz, get both! Actually I use both of them, and find myself using the URS's for "flavor" and the Sony when I need an unobtrusive e.q. (if that makes any sense)  TommyD |
|
| |
|
10th December 2005, 11:10 PM
| #5 |
| Lives for gear  Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,653
| They are both the cream of the crop and I feel the same way about them as the guys above. Sony's are so great for detail oriented eq while the URS are great for overall coloration. I need both personally. |
|
| |
|
11th December 2005, 01:33 AM
| #6 |
| Lives for gear  Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: In A Galaxy Far Far Away
Posts: 777
| do you guys find yourself using both on one track ever? Thanx M2E
__________________ "M2E" www.kakalakakoffee.com www.myspace.com/m2emusic www.myspace.com/kakalakakoffeemusicgroup Sorry in advance for any misspelled words, phrases or not using the right meaning/s at the right times. So get over it and back to the post at hand!!! Thanx.... How long does it take to do a mix. - UNTIL IT'S DONE!!! One thing I'd like you to understand. It's much easier to be done than to be satisfied!! Bruce Swedien |
|
| |
|
11th December 2005, 03:05 PM
| #7 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Music City
Posts: 337
| Thanks for the feedback!
__________________ "Polishing turds is worlds cheaper today but it's really hard to call that progress."-Bob Olhsson |
|
| |
|
12th December 2005, 05:20 PM
| #8 |
| Gear maniac  Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 152
| I'd get sony... |
|
| |
|
12th December 2005, 06:23 PM
| #9 | |
| Lives for gear  Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 564
| Quote:
If you could only get one I'd get the Sony simply because its so flexible. the URS are more for broad strokes of flavor in my usage. I have to fix so much stuff I get, the Sony gets used first/most. | |
|
| |
|
13th December 2005, 05:05 AM
| #10 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 312
| don't you find that the digi eq III stacks up against Sony eq? |
|
| |
|
13th December 2005, 05:32 AM
| #11 |
| Lives for gear  Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Miami Beach
Posts: 1,564
| I was wondering if anyone knows which is more CPU-friendly? |
|
| |
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |
Linear Mode
