![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Seagate 7200.10 "perpendicular" hard drive? | mopppish | Music computers | 17 | 10th June 2008 11:30 PM |
| Macook with 5400 or 7200 hd? | midiman123 | Music computers | 6 | 7th August 2006 07:15 PM |
| Sata 7200.9 Drive in G5? | TLMUSIC | Music computers | 1 | 13th February 2006 11:07 PM |
| Do I need 10,000 rpm or is 7200 enough? | Infernal Device | Music computers | 19 | 10th September 2005 07:14 AM |
| Anybody use the AVammo Hush 7200 Ext. Firewire Drive? | 808st8 | Music computers | 2 | 1st April 2003 07:20 AM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: UK
Posts: 76
| 7200 drive in ibook G4 Hi! I need to upgrade my laptop and am seeking advice on 7200 drives in ibook G4's (1gig, 512Kb cache) particularly the Seagate Momentus 8Mbyte cache 100 gig drive. I know one would expect performance to increase, but since the CPU and memory subsystems also work harder I wonder if the internal structure of an ibook is capable of dealing with it. I presume the recent generation of HD's are more efficient and so I'm trusting that it won't overheat while doing simple tracking, which brings me to an important one, i.e. how quiet are these drives? Also, how much Is the 8mb buffer a factor? I read a report from someonoe who had the same model ibook as I with an Hitachi 7200mb (but 2mbyte cache) who had an extra 15% Power consumption, significantly better performance but a much warmer ibook, An interesting test can be found here: http://www.barefeats.com/hard56.html I'm trying to hold off buying a Powerbook to see what the new year brings, so any advice to any one of these questions will be appreciated! Steve |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 5,760
| That looks pretty promising. I guess it should be noted that the writer expected the Seagate to run a bit hotter than their 5400. It looked pretty good against the Travelstar, about 20% faster on sustained transfer, and maybe around 10% faster random writes. |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |