Convolution Conundrum - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Music computers


Convolution Conundrum

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 2nd December 2005   #1
Gear addict
 
D.F.'s Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: Bristol, U.K.
Posts: 424

Thread Starter
Convolution Conundrum

Reading through the threads on Altiverb vs Waves IR-1 there really is no one common consensus. Both have their fans.

I was wondering: can one use IR-1 impulses within Altiverb, or vice versa? If so, which way is best and doesn't this give you best of both worlds, except that you can tweak more within IR-1?

I am leaning more towards Altiverb, really only just because it is a bit cheaper than the waves (and I've just bought 6 neve 31102s so pretty skinted out). But is this a false economy and should I spend the extra on waves? Reverb-wise I have a Lexicon 224xl, an EMT 240 goldfoil and an AKG BX20 spring. I guess I am looking for realistic 3-D impulses of bitchin drum rooms etc to add to these.

Thanks.
D.F. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2005   #2
Moderator
 
Reptil's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Location: in a low orbit
Posts: 19,386

Altiverb all the way. very friendly, pro support. sound engine, cool IRs..
never ever heard anything bad from anybody else about them too...
__________________

CONVERTERS FOR SALE HERE: link
Reptil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2005   #3
Gear addict
 
eskay's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 363

Another vote for Altiverb. Great support, huge library, amazing sound all around.
2 big thumbs up. Stay the phuck away from Waves man. Read the writing on the wall. Don't make a stupid decision and go with Waves.

eskay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2005   #4
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: New England
Posts: 1,727

Altiverb is great. Those guys practically invented convolution reverb!
6strings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2005   #5
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 574

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6strings
Altiverb is great. Those guys practically invented convolution reverb!
Wouldn't it be SONY ?
I Lurk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2005   #6
Lives for gear
 
preben's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Location: London
Posts: 901

I am really not trying to be stupid here but what is the writing on the wall in relation to waves..???
preben is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2005   #7
Gear addict
 
Billster's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Hamburg / Old Europe
Posts: 443

TL SPACE rules !

What about TL SPACE ? Sounds more natural than Altiverb to my ears. Gives you an astonishing depth.

Just my $ 0.02

Bill
Billster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2005   #8
Mac Moderator
 
Geert van den Berg's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2003
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 3,454

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billster
What about TL SPACE ? Sounds more natural than Altiverb to my ears. Gives you an astonishing depth.

Just my $ 0.02

Bill
I have used both, but not compared them directly. I don't think there is much difference using the same IR's.

At first I liked the TL space interface better. But the new v5 Altiverb has an interface that is equal IMHO. You can't go wrong with either.
Geert van den Berg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2005   #9
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: New England
Posts: 1,727

Quote:
Originally Posted by I Lurk
Wouldn't it be SONY ?
One in every crowd. - I said "practically." Audioease were the first to release a convolution plug-in as an alternative to Sony's ultra-expensive hardware unit.
6strings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2005   #10
Gear addict
 
farjedi's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 487

Another alternative that I've tested against Waves IR and won is Maudio's wizooverb. It's a lot cheaper too.
farjedi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2005   #11
Lives for gear
 
Messiah's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: North West Coast, UK.
Posts: 603

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6strings
Altiverb is great. Those guys practically invented convolution reverb!
Actually, it was me and I told them how to put it into plugin form...

Altiverb does indeed, ahem, rock.
__________________
Best Regards,
Carl.
Messiah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2005   #12
Gear addict
 
JeffSanders's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Fairhaven, MA
Posts: 334

Another vote here for Wizooverb W2. If you're on a pc, there's nothing that comes close.
imho
__________________
http://www.mountainmirrors.com
JeffSanders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th December 2005   #13
Gear addict
 
D.F.'s Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: Bristol, U.K.
Posts: 424

Thread Starter
Thanks guys. Well, I plumped for the Altiverb and it should arrive monday. Really looking forward to it...

D.F. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th December 2005   #14
3 + infractions, forum membership suspended.
 
newrigel's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 124

Quote:
Originally Posted by I Lurk
Wouldn't it be SONY ?
NO!
Not on a personal COMPUTER! Altiverb ROCKS because hence it's name Alti-Verb... like Alti- vec! Only the Mac utilizes this on die processor and it's processing power keeps the latency ultra low... The PC convo plugs are really unusable in real-time because of the latency issue.
Chalk an other one up for MACS! I heard that even the new Intels are going to utilize this architecture... we'll see.
newrigel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th December 2005   #15
Gear addict
 
D.F.'s Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: Bristol, U.K.
Posts: 424

Thread Starter
Wow. Altiverb is outstanding. Just what the doctor ordered.
D.F. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th December 2005   #16
Lives for gear
 
AdamJay's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 2,825

Quote:
Originally Posted by D.F.
can one use IR-1 impulses within Altiverb, or vice versa?

wow, all these hip-hip-horray responses and not one single person answered your question.

anyone?

i wish i knew the answer myself, but i thought i'd at least point out the irony.
__________________
AdamJay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th December 2005   #17
Gear Head
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 63

I havn't checked recently, but a year or so ago, Altiverb used it's own format which is not compatiable with what every single other convlution verb uses. That aside, it seems like a great app and I wish it were available on PC.
aintnosunshine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th December 2005   #18
Rep
Lives for gear
 
Rep's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Location: So-Cal
Posts: 1,778

Quote:
Originally Posted by aintnosunshine
I havn't checked recently, but a year or so ago, Altiverb used it's own format which is not compatiable with what every single other convlution verb uses. That aside, it seems like a great app and I wish it were available on PC.
I thought I read that It was in the works ???
Big market to ignore ...!
__________________
The only regrets We will have in Life......Are the things we Never Tried To do.
Rep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th December 2005   #19
Lives for gear
 
Messiah's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: North West Coast, UK.
Posts: 603

Altiverb does indeed .

Anyone who has been with Altiverb from the beginning will also tell you how it continually evolves and gets better.

The AudioEase guys are a great example the Waves Corporation would be wise to analyse when it comes to dealing with their users.
Messiah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th December 2005   #20
Rep
Lives for gear
 
Rep's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Location: So-Cal
Posts: 1,778

Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Messiah
Altiverb does indeed ..
It suports XP now right ?
...will look into that ......Hmmm....
Rep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th December 2005   #21
Lives for gear
 
junior's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,078

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamJay
wow, all these hip-hip-horray responses and not one single person answered your question.


Quote:
Originally Posted by D.F.
can one use IR-1 impulses within Altiverb, or vice versa?
i think the answers are: "no" and "not really". afaik, ir1's presets are in a format that's exclusive to ir1. altiverb's impulses are non-interleaved sdII files but they're encrypted. there are utilities that can convert them, but i think it violates audioease's EULA...

fwiw, i thought the ir1 impulses sounded the best - more 3d. i haven't tried the wizoo verb yet, though...
__________________
"Creativity is allowing yourself to make mistakes. Art is knowing which ones to keep"...
--Scott Adams
junior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th December 2005   #22
Gear addict
 
farjedi's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 487

I read someone that altiverb's impulses could be opened as raw wavs although I cannot varify that. However I have just tried to open some .wir (IR1) files and, although it opened it up, it just sounds like whitenoise. Give it a whirl though and let us know if this works.
farjedi is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
RME PCI connection conundrum Groove Dog Music computers 3 24th May 2006 07:50 PM
Neve 1073 conundrum kifaru High end 22 19th September 2005 02:04 PM
CABLE CONUNDRUM - TRS vs. 1/4" ? 2012 Low End Theory 2 13th May 2005 03:41 PM
Small diaphragm conundrum PatrickWasTaken So much gear, so little time! 17 13th December 2004 10:08 PM
Ribbon mic conundrum?? tee So much gear, so little time! 16 24th July 2003 02:55 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:52 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.