![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear | USB interfaces- latency, bit dropping ect
This came up in a thread on the Apogee Mini Me but it kind of fizzled out, probably because I cut/pasted a big post- whoops sorry. Anyway I have a couple questions for someone who knows: Digidesign lists the monitoring latency for the Mbox at 164 samples. Now depending on the amount of information passed via USB, will this change at all, or remain consistent at 164 samples even if the USB bus is choked with more than it can handle(I don't know what the latency is for the MiniMe but assume something similar)? Bob Ohlsson posted that it is 'legal' for the USB protocol to drop bits(ie. truncate without dither, correct?)- when will this happen? At random? Thing is, I'm looking into getting a portable MiniMe/MiniDAC combo at some point and it would be nice to know what I'm getting into and whether or not I'll need to get a PCMCIA/SPIDF interface instead of going in USB. BTW why would Grace and Apogee use USB in the first place, I'd expect that from a cheep Digidesign box, but..? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear nut Joined: May 2003 Location: London
Posts: 94
| latency
I've found my midiman audiosport duo to be quite heavy on latency. Even at it's lowest setting i can't software monitor. I haven't noticed any drop-outs or picks in the sound though. Does firewire address these issues? I was looking at purchasing the motu 828 mkII, but definitely won't if it doesn't address the issues of the usb cable. How does firewire compare to a traditional pci type soundcard? |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear |
Bouunce Neilsby, firewire is much better. MOTU should list the latency spec somewhere, or you could email them. I think you'll be ok with the 828 though. So no one knows the answers to my USB woes then? |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Motown legend Joined: Jun 2002 Location: Songwriter Gulch, Nashville TN
Posts: 10,877
|
The USB spec. permits the use of amazingly cheap hardware that does not handle data reliably without massive levels of buffering and error-correction overhead. While this is ok for consumer products and game machines, it isn't nearly as appropriate for real time data acquisition as most other serial port formats and hardware.
__________________ Bob's room 615 562-4346 Georgetown Masters 615 254-3233 Music Industry 2.0 Interview |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Mindreader |
Does this mean that the Mini Me is useless for 'playing along to'?
|
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Motown legend Joined: Jun 2002 Location: Songwriter Gulch, Nashville TN
Posts: 10,877
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Lives for gear |
Thanks for the reply, Bob. If you have any links to info about some of the problems with USB or care to elaborate any further it will be appreciated. Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Motown legend Joined: Jun 2002 Location: Songwriter Gulch, Nashville TN
Posts: 10,877
|
A friend of mine was developing a wearable documentation system for the space program. USB looked like a great solution until he looked into the specs of the chips and discovered that spilling bits all over the floor was considered acceptable.
|
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Lexicon Alpha USB Interface Latency, and Direct Monitoring | Luqmann | Music computers | 2 | 19th November 2011 08:59 AM |
| Logic/Mackie 400F latency problem | Tibbon | Music computers | 6 | 27th March 2007 06:22 PM |
| Midi interface latency | stonecutter | Music computers | 0 | 27th February 2007 08:43 PM |
| Drop Ceiling Question in Control Room | jsteiger | So much gear, so little time! | 13 | 24th January 2007 05:51 PM |
| RAM modules with different latencies | morebutter | Music computers | 2 | 5th December 2006 02:57 AM |
| |