![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| MIDI controler recomendation | geodude | Low End Theory | 7 | 3rd September 2006 06:51 PM |
| Controler broken - sent for repair! | Jules | So much gear, so little time! | 4 | 4th August 2005 05:15 PM |
| Controler ? | loke | So much gear, so little time! | 11 | 22nd April 2005 02:42 PM |
| Behringer BCF2000 controler...anyone? | lesique | Low End Theory | 1 | 21st January 2005 12:35 AM |
| Control 24 or Mackie Controler | passionmax | So much gear, so little time! | 28 | 3rd February 2004 03:58 AM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Whittier, CA
Posts: 178
| Best controler for PT-LE? I've been mixing with the mouse for years now Digi 002r and PT-LE. Other cats who mix in PT have said that I would be able to work faster if I had a control surface. Anyway, Command-8 looks ok but I have also thought about getting a board that can be a controler and I could maybe mix through and the effects might even be useable. Anyway, a mid priced digital board that might be a controler for PT and maybe usefull enought to rought some of my outboard gear, distressors, avalon, t.c. electronics to be able to mix with it all. the new Tascam DM-3200? Maybe a Yamaha or Mackie digital board? Any thoughts would be great, what are you guys useing? sweet sam |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear Head | <img src="http://www.sweetwater.com/images/items/M24-large.jpg"> by mixed logic, $2800 + <img src="http://www.sweetwater.com/images/items/PTKeyboard-large.jpg"> PTK , $250 =streamlined
__________________ "Music is the wine that fills the cup of silence." -Robert Fripp |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear | sac-2k works OK in HUI emulation mode.. but trying to get service out of those mofos is like pulling teeth. i wouldn't get a controller to run audio thru.. the signal paths are too cheap. I think my solution for mixing OTB is probably gonna be an apogee DA-16 (8 for LE, 8 for S6000), a folcrom, and some hot-rodded neve modules... then save up for a Cranesong Spider. The Nicerizer looks cool too. it could be your best option is swapping the 002r for an 002... kinda depnds on how much coin u wanna drop and how good you want things to sound.
__________________ 3WO - Mixing Without Tears "Tape is a mangler.." -- Slipperman // "The idea of the perfect album is this amorphous thing we're always aiming at. For us, it can mean something full of imperfection. Part of our aim has always been to destroy the sound in a beautiful way. It doesn't mean we expect everyone would like it. I'm not sure we will ever get there... but the whole point of making music is at least to aim at your own idea of perfection." -- Boards of Canada |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/Pro-Tools-LE-or-...temZ5833537689
__________________ 3WO - Mixing Without Tears "Tape is a mangler.." -- Slipperman // "The idea of the perfect album is this amorphous thing we're always aiming at. For us, it can mean something full of imperfection. Part of our aim has always been to destroy the sound in a beautiful way. It doesn't mean we expect everyone would like it. I'm not sure we will ever get there... but the whole point of making music is at least to aim at your own idea of perfection." -- Boards of Canada | |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Mac Moderator Join Date: May 2003 Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 2,579
| Which controller depends a bit on your budget. If you can afford a used Pro Control or Control24 I would go with that since those communicate the best with PT and can be connected thru ethernet. On the cheap I've used the Mackie Control, but I advise against that unit, because the faders break down a lot. We have several in our tracking rooms and they all have the same problems. Furthermore the small pan-pots aren't very usuable and there is no flip mode for getting your sends on the faders. Also if you use an extender there is no way of getting the sends on that too. And it's connected via MIDI. PT doesn't support 3rd party controllers via ethernet, but you'll need a to connect the Mackie thru a MIDI interface, which is an extra step. IMHO it doesn't react very fluently. I haven't used the Tascam US-2400 but it looks quite promising to me. http://www.tascam.com/Products/US-2400.html 24 faders. It does support flipping of the sends to the faders. The pan-pots look allright, but I am not sure about that. It connect in HUI mode via MIDI but you connect it to your computer via USB, so there's no seperate MIDI i/o in between. I also think the Command 8 is quite allright if you are really set on using it with PT. It can work with other apps too via MIDI, but you'll have to make setups yourself then. I thought the faders are comparable to the ones on the Control24, which aren't great, but feel allright. And the pan-pots are allright. But then you would be limited to 8 faders. I am not sure how the new M-audio controller/interface compares to the Comand 8. Command 8 still seems a bit more PT friendly as I gather from the M-audio website. The JLcooper 3800 is great too, but it's very expensive. The build quality is great but since it's connected via MIDI and HUI (every controller besides Digi controllers) I think it's a bit too expensive. And if you want pans above your fader you need to expand. The SAC-2 controller is okay but I didn't really like the pan-pots. Further it's also quite expensive. Why does almost every manufacturer have to put such small flimsy pots on these things? The Digi ones are allright, but could be better (and not to mention those clicking pots in the earlier ProCon at the plugin parameter section, what the hell were they thinking?) I read an article a while ago about an pot which was rotation was unlimited, but could also have a centre detent, that would be ultimate. Pity I can't find the article anymore. |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Fairfield, CT
Posts: 248
| Quote:
Is this what you mean? I'm hoping stupid Mackie will fix this issue. s | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: London
Posts: 551
| ProControl doesn't work with LE unfortunately. If it were me, I'd probably stick with the digi interfaces if you're using PT. Command 8 is a great bit of kit, but if you need a bigger solution Control24's are going really cheap used at the moment. (guess everybody's buying D-Command). Depends on your budget...... |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| Mac Moderator Join Date: May 2003 Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 2,579
| Quote:
And sometimes it's start knocking to the top position making an annoying sound, reset solves that, but the fader still lags. | |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Mac Moderator Join Date: May 2003 Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 2,579
| Quote:
In my PT LE install there is a controller file for the Pro Control, why would that install if it wouldn't work? I think I also read somewhere that it wasn't supported, but it could work, why would Digi limit its sales? Have you tried it and then it didn't work? | |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: London
Posts: 551
| No I haven't tried it..... but from Digi's compatibility pages: |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Mac Moderator Join Date: May 2003 Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 2,579
| I guess the Pro Control won't work then, also not a good choice if it worked, because it's not supported. Anyone care to try? I am still curious... Then IMHO as best choice for PT remains the Control 24. |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Glasgow UK
Posts: 6
| The Tascam FW1884 would work perfectly well as a basic controller to your Pro Tools (over firewire in its Hui emu mode) and you could hook up the adat out to your digi 002 and use the tascam's 8 pre's etc, they are going quite cheap at the moment if your not looking to spend much |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Music City
Posts: 172
| Quote:
Another vote for the Mixed Logic board. Mixed Logic Website | |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |