Pro Tools 7 Software Optimizations Deliver Host-processing Performance Increases - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Music computers


Pro Tools 7 Software Optimizations Deliver Host-processing Performance Increases

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 29th October 2005   #1
Gearslutz.com admin
 
Jules's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Location: A Yank in London, UK
Posts: 17,805

Thread Starter

Thumbs up Pro Tools 7 Software Optimizations Deliver Host-processing Performance Increases

From the Digi site

Pro Tools 7 software boasts powerful RTAS plug-in performance improvements within the RTAS engine and the RTAS plug-in environment, allowing Pro Tools HD 7, Pro Tools LE 7, and Pro Tools M-Powered 7 software users to run significantly more RTAS processing and instrument plug-ins on single- and multi-processor computers.

The RTAS engine in Pro Tools 7 software has been completely overhauled for load-balanced multi-processor support. This enables you to take advantage of every available host processor in your system to perform RTAS processing — delivering plug-in instance counts that scale with the number of processors in your computer. For example, you will see up to twice the number of RTAS plug-ins on dual-processor computers. Preliminary tests† with Digidesign's EQ III shows a performance increase of 98% with Pro Tools 7 software vs. Pro Tools 6.9.2 software.†† Digidesign's D-Verb plug-in also shows similar results, demonstrating a performance increase of 83%. Native Instruments Battery 2 showed a 60% performance increase with Pro Tools 7 software.

Thanks to the enhanced RTAS plug-in environment in Pro Tools 7 software, plug-in developers can create more efficient processing and instrument plug-ins — allowing Pro Tools users to enjoy more plug-in instances on single- and multi-processor systems. When used in tandem with the enhanced multi-processor RTAS engine, select plug-ins will benefit significantly, delivering up to 150% more plug-in instances on dual-processor computers. For example, Arturia's CS-80V virtual synthesizer shows a performance increase of 125% with Pro Tools 7 software* vs. Pro Tools 6.9.2 software.** Way Out Ware's TimewARP 2600 virtual synthesizer also shows clear performance gains, demonstrating a performance increase of 114% over pre-Pro Tools 7 software. Digidesign's EQ III showed an impressive 151% performance increase with Pro Tools 7 software.

† Tests were performed using Pro Tools LE 7 software and a Digi 002 system running on a dual-core Pentium D 3.0 GHz, and a Power Mac G5 Dual 2.3 GHz
†† Tests were performed using a dual-core Pentium D 3.0 GHz system
* Tests were performed using optimized "beta RTAS plug-ins on a Power Mac G5 Dual 2.3 GHz system (two processors used)
** Tests were performed using non-optimized RTAS plug-ins on a Power Mac G5 Dual 2.3 GHz system (one processor used)

NOTE
Plug-in performance data was produced using systems and software mentioned above, using "beta" versions of optimized plug-ins. Results may vary based on your individual hardware and software configuration.
Jules is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th October 2005   #2
Lives for gear
 
Tetness's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Location: Hollywood
Posts: 1,573

When will it be released????
Tetness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th October 2005   #3
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Location: Nashville
Posts: 1,816

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jules
From the Digi site


NOTE
Plug-in performance data was produced using systems and software mentioned above, using "beta" versions of optimized plug-ins. Results may vary based on your individual hardware and software configuration.
Looks to me as if the plugins themselves have to be optimized, as well as the PT software. How many plugin developers will do that, and when, are the real questions. The main point I'm making is that you're not going to simply update your PT software and get the benefit. You'll need updated plugins as well, at least according to this press release.

Which also makes me wonder why VST plugins using SX/Nuendo do not require any particular optimizations to take advantage of all 4 cores on my dual, dualcore Opterons? The load balances almost perfectly across all 4 cores, just by virtue of changes made to Nuendo, with no changes required for the plugins themselves.

Hmmmm. I wonder why PT requires plugin recoding to multithread? That seems weird.
__________________
Regards,
Brian T
BrianT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th October 2005   #4
Lives for gear
 
Renie's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 1,777

That's great news Jules thumbsup
Renie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th October 2005   #5
Gear maniac
 
travista00's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 167

PT 7 out november 4th, according to digi.....
travista00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th October 2005   #6
Lives for gear
 
True North's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: Richmond Hill, Ontario (Canada)
Posts: 3,213

For those of you who want to keep themselves from ripping out whatever remaining hair is on your heads (sorry Jules) I would highly reccomend waiting at least 5 to 6 months before jumping the on PT 7 bandwagon. Every software vendor on the planet is trying to get in on the whole Multi CPU, 64 bit thing and PT is one of the last to the game - can you say rush job - not to mention that PT is the last vendor that I would trust to truly try and optimize their native environments!! Wait until the other lemmings sort out all the numerous bugs which are sure to ship with this first version.

__________________
"In the time of chimpanzees I was a monkey" - Beck, Loser

"I do use compressors/limiters but not for controlling dynamics, I use EQ for that!" Jp22 (damn I miss him)

"Education is a progressive discovery of our own ignorance." -- Will Durant, historian (1885-1981)

"I try to get a boom out of the bass drum, in one of my albums, my CD, boom, I try to get that big boom, I could not get a big boom, I paid bucks, and could not get the boom" - Recording Expert, Tad Donley
True North is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th October 2005   #7
Gear addict
 
johnjm22's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: Barstow, CA
Posts: 372

Quote:
Originally Posted by True North
For those of you who want to keep themselves from ripping out whatever remaining hair is on your heads (sorry Jules) I would highly reccomend waiting at least 5 to 6 months before jumping the on PT 7 bandwagon. Every software vendor on the planet is trying to get in on the whole Multi CPU, 64 bit thing and PT is one of the last to the game - can you say rush job - not to mention that PT is the last vendor that I would trust to truly try and optimize their native environments!! Wait until the other lemmings sort out all the numerous bugs which are sure to ship with this first version.


Agreed. It's always best to stay a few updates behind imo. That way all the bugs will be worked out by the time you upgrade.
johnjm22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th October 2005   #8
Lives for gear
 
max cooper's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: tx
Posts: 8,802

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnjm22
Agreed. It's always best to stay a few updates behind imo. That way all the bugs will be worked out by the time you upgrade.

This is good advice with any platform/os
max cooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th October 2005   #9
Lives for gear
 
T_R_S's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Canuk
Posts: 5,278

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianT
Hmmmm. I wonder why PT requires plugin recoding to multithread? That seems weird.
That's because of the recoding in PT 7 for true multi-processor support.
Protools never really had it as you could only assign RTAS to 99% of one processor.
That's all changed with 7. thumbsup
__________________
FB Page

==========

Surplus Sale
T_R_S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st November 2005   #10
Lives for gear
 
Tetness's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Location: Hollywood
Posts: 1,573

I'm going to upgrade right away. Even though waiting would obviously be the smartest thing. But I really need that new midi stuff for what I do. That's why I ditched Logic Pro.
Tetness is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pro Tools|HD-TDM vs Nuendo-VST System Link vs Logic Pro-Distributed Audio Processing Rob G Music computers 71 22nd November 2008 03:57 PM
#Of Mac Pro's In Nodes = The Processing Power Of Pro Tools|HD (Hardware)7 Accel? Rob G High end 12 29th August 2006 06:45 PM
Pro-Tools Performance Question... Mudnoc Music computers 18 19th March 2006 12:08 AM
Pro Tools HD 7 SOFTWARE pitman Music computers 0 16th September 2005 02:07 AM
Need urgent Help with Pro Tools Audiosuite Plug-in Processing Problem echo unit Music computers 1 3rd June 2005 06:54 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:47 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.