All Advertisers
| All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Calling all "Pro Tools Midi Gurus" - 1st post | boowah | Music computers | 4 | 7th June 2006 04:47 AM |
| Pro Tools creating "invisible" folders when backing up? | jucifer | Music computers | 1 | 13th January 2006 11:49 PM |
| A "Pro/Quality" Mix along the lines of Sterling "after hours"... | G-3 | High end | 4 | 20th September 2005 12:12 AM |
| Apogee AD & Mix Class "Tools" | piratebruce | So much gear, so little time! | 3 | 7th December 2004 12:45 AM |
| "The Pro Tools Revolution" Rolling Stone article | chessparov | So much gear, so little time! | 2 | 16th April 2003 12:53 AM |
 |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
28th October 2005, 04:47 PM
| #1 |
| Gear maniac  Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 154
| Pro Tools: "Skinnable" Mix-buss Digi presented their white paper about the 48-bit HD mix-buss last night in L.A. One of the interesting things that came up was that the mix-buss is actually a plug-in and that the plug-in is currently designed to be transparent but that it would be possible to model other mix-busses as well, since the architecture of the plug-in is the same as that of an analog mix-buss. In other words, it's possible to "skin" the mix-buss so that the sonic characteristics of the summing could be made to emulate a neve or ssl console for instance. How many people are interested in having that feature in Pro Tools?
__________________ ------------------------------- Travis Huff @ BK Ent Group http://www.travishuff.com |
|  |
|
28th October 2005, 04:56 PM
| #2 |
| Gear addict  Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: ITHACA, NY
Posts: 364
| My idea! My idea! Sorry. I'd love to see this happen. Cranesong mixbus.
__________________ Get back to work! |
|
| |
|
28th October 2005, 04:58 PM
| #3 |
| Lives for gear  Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 556
| I loved how they though it was just a so-so idea, and then EVERYBODY raised their hand when asked if they would want it. |
|
| |
|
28th October 2005, 05:55 PM
| #4 |
| Lives for gear  Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 1,163
| Its a plug-in? "designed to be transparent"? Well...how good a design? Does this add some sort of credibility to those who say PT has a "sound"?
__________________ "Some of you people just plain don't know s---. No offense." -theblue1 "Tell us if it looks like it will sound good." -RKrizman "The many truths we cling to depend greatly on our point of view." -Obi-Wan Kenobi |
|
| |
|
28th October 2005, 06:10 PM
| #5 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 556
| Quote:
| |
|
| |
|
28th October 2005, 06:17 PM
| #6 |
| Lives for gear  Join Date: May 2004 Location: Los Angeles ,Ca.
Posts: 5,972
| Didn't MCDSP already try this with the Analog channel stuff a while ago? At least that was kind of the marketing angle |
|
| |
|
28th October 2005, 06:23 PM
| #7 |
| Lives for gear  Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: London UK
Posts: 1,785
| Well the analog channel (or any other similar plug-in) will be 'added' to the digi mix bus "plug-in". Digi were surprised at the enthusiastic response!?!! 
__________________ www.christisloving.com |
|
| |
|
28th October 2005, 06:45 PM
| #8 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 556
| Quote:
The 'problem' with Analog Channel is that with the current mixer it's always placed after summing. It just doesn't feel the same. I think the plan here would be to get the saturation/transfer curve in front of the summing. Digi said the math and processing power involved to do all that shit around the mixer in realtime is insane. But of course anything is possible if the customer base is willing to shell out the $$$$. I had heard before that modeled mixers were in the works up there, but last night they poo-poo'd it in terms of practicality. Could be just trying to throw us off, or set us up to pay through the nose to get it.  | |
|
| |
|
28th October 2005, 09:16 PM
| #9 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 443
| put a cranesong phoenix on your mix buss and it will have a sound. rounds the edges and seems to make the low end fuller. -brian |
| |
|
28th October 2005, 09:26 PM
| #10 |
| Lives for gear  Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Phoenix
Posts: 6,680
 | I'd love to hear it. If it sounded good I'd use it. Great idea if you ask me.
__________________ _________________ "What is a crossfire hurricane & why wasn't I born in one?" Randy Wright http://www.myspace.com/djui5 |
|
| |
|
28th October 2005, 10:12 PM
| #11 |
| Lives for gear  Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: C-ville area VA
Posts: 1,282
| I had no idea the mix buss was a plugin...maybe that explains what I'm hearing.  |
|
| |
|
28th October 2005, 10:22 PM
| #12 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 556
| Quote:
| |
|
| |
|
28th October 2005, 11:13 PM
| #13 |
| Gearslutz.com admin  Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: London, UK
Posts: 11,790
| "Vintage" Mix + sound as an option...?  OK I want HD, I'm not bitter... 
__________________ Jules "PS. I don't have an opinion on the topic." - jdtrbn |
|
| |
|
29th October 2005, 01:21 AM
| #14 |
| Lives for gear  Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: los angeles
Posts: 629
| Digi ... is there more to the mixer plugin than meets the eye ... is the mixer plugin post summing also ... or "is" it the summing buss ??? may i say that i knew the mixer was a plugin as i use the dithered mixers ion pro tools and they are polugins in the plugins folder ... you have to move the standard mixers into the unused plugins folder to use them .. in your system usage we can see how much juice our mixers take up ... 4-DSP's is about what mine is at most times ... so we have the power if someone can come up with a DSP efficient version of a mix-buss emulation ... so why not license the spec to companies that want to take the time and money to create a "mixer" plugin for pro tools .. this seems like such a cool idea ... i am not unhappy with the Digi mioxer as i do not push mine hard ... average around -12 ... and do my mastering (i use that loosely) analog on the way out of Pro Tools ... i think hearing the analog Pro Tools output sounds nicer, TO ME, than boucing to disk ... peace john |
|
| |
|
29th October 2005, 01:24 AM
| #15 |
| Lives for gear  Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: los angeles
Posts: 968
| I have thought for awhile now that they must be working on this. It's the next logical step that would make them more money, and soon the computers will be plenty fast enough. |
|
| |
|
29th October 2005, 01:32 AM
| #16 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 556
| Quote:
I think the fact that the mixer is a "plug in" is confusing people. This is not like a compressor or something that a third party would do. The mixer plugin is PT. They don't want to release the code under the hood. | |
|
| |
|
29th October 2005, 01:39 AM
| #17 | |
| Lives for gear  Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Annapolis, MD/L.A.
Posts: 3,612
| Quote:
| |
|
| |
|
29th October 2005, 01:41 AM
| #18 |
| Lives for gear  Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,320
| This probably won't make much sense but anyway... But why not make digital better at being digital instead of trying to mimic analog... |
|
| |
|
29th October 2005, 02:04 AM
| #19 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: C-ville area VA
Posts: 1,282
| Quote:
When I mix on a board I'm usually happy with the results...when I try in Protools, I don't. But I admit to not being good at ITB mixing. I've heard a lot of ITB mixes and while some are really good mixes...the sonics aren't "right" to me. For instance, the records I love the sound of are Travis "The Man Who", Coldplay ...the latest record and "Cold rush of blood", EmmyLou Harris "WreckingBall", the Switchfoot record...not really one style of mixing, but the big sound and width of those records. I would love to hear some great ITB mixes with depth and width though.....anybody want to post some?  I seriously would love to hear some --- I'd love to switch to ITB mixing for automation, total recall!!!!!  Micah | |
|
| |
|
29th October 2005, 02:29 PM
| #20 | |
| Mac Moderator  Join Date: May 2003 Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 2,579
| Quote:
But...I also would like the option of having a "vintage" kind of summing buss... maybe with an option in the prefs where you can select which algorithm is used, just as with the time-stretch tool... The time is now to be able to use the best of both worlds... | |
|
| |
|
29th October 2005, 09:27 PM
| #21 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Bavaria
Posts: 28
|  I used the DAG- Mixer for years in my ProTools Mix-System. It was designed to sound more "analog"....Digidesign took it off the market within days (nethertheless it has been a free software-download). - Companys name was "Digital Audio Miracles". |
|
| |
|
30th October 2005, 01:46 PM
| #22 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,320
| Quote:
 ...the best of both worlds. So Digital or digital models of analog? Whats the second world again? Do you really think a digital model of an analog summing bus is suddenly going to give you the depth and width of an analog console? Every digital modelling amp & every modelled plug in has fallen short of being able to create a replica of analog. Hell! lets use convolution and actually copy the analog waveform and apply it to digital sound... wow still sounds like junk. It should be great to combine something so lacking to something as crucial as the summing bus. | |
|
| |
|
30th October 2005, 02:40 PM
| #23 | |
| Gear addict  Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 463
| Quote:
| |
|
| |
|
30th October 2005, 03:23 PM
| #24 | ||
| Mac Moderator Join Date: May 2003 Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 2,579
| Quote:
Quote:
| ||
|
| |
|
30th October 2005, 04:38 PM
| #25 |
| Lives for gear  Join Date: May 2004 Location: Toronto Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,516
| I want them to make it a plugin... ...so I can drop it into Pro Tools LE/M-Powered   |
|
| |
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |
Linear Mode
