+-50 Tracks 96kHz - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Music computers


+-50 Tracks 96kHz

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28th February 2010   #1
Lives for gear
 
jpupo74's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: Colombia / Montreal
Posts: 1,310

Thread Starter
+-50 Tracks 96kHz

Hi,
Is anyone around here mixing projects which have between 50 and 64 tracks in 96kHz? If so, what computers are you using? I just sawpped to Reaper and there are lots of glitches. I cannot even hit play without one single plugin.

Intel core 2 Duo 3GB of RAM.
Also tried in a Laptop Intel core duo almost 3 GHZ, 4 RAM
MacBookPro Intel core 2 duo, 2 RAM.

Thanks,
Pupo
__________________
Looking for a mint condition TD4
Loving the
I HATE gear pimps!
jpupo74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2010   #2
Lives for gear
 
Mike Brown's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Location: Minneapolis MN
Posts: 3,188

I have been doing 75+ tracks as a 7.1 submix fairly regularly on a 3 year old Mac Book Pro (2.4 Ghz) with 4 gigs of ram and eSATA drives on a PTLE system....

I don't think the gig of ram would be THAT much of a difference... Where are you playing your tracks back from? I would recommend on an eSATA connection or FW800 minimum...

Any other info you can give us on your rig so we can narrow down the choke point?
Mike Brown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2010   #3
Lives for gear
 
jpupo74's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: Colombia / Montreal
Posts: 1,310

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Brown View Post
I have been doing 75+ tracks as a 7.1 submix fairly regularly on a 3 year old Mac Book Pro (2.4 Ghz) with 4 gigs of ram and eSATA drives on a PTLE system....

I don't think the gig of ram would be THAT much of a difference... Where are you playing your tracks back from? I would recommend on an eSATA connection or FW800 minimum...

Any other info you can give us on your rig so we can narrow down the choke point?
Thanks a lot for your response Mike!
The best result Ive obtained is on a Dell with an Intel Core 2 Duo 3 RAM. Not very sure of the processor but two days ago I installed a RAID 0 made of two 500GB 7k2 drives running not with a RAID card but with the BIOS setting (software?)

I use a Mytek 8x192 via FW, mixing in the box with outaboard gear.
I tried to mix even by using 2048 as buffer size.

Ive also tried external FW Drives.
I am about to buy an SSD drive to see what happens but Im tired of not being to work normally.

Cheers,
Pupo
jpupo74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2010   #4
Gear Guru
 
psycho_monkey's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Location: London
Posts: 14,291

Send a message via Skype™ to psycho_monkey
I've run 64 tracks at 96k from one fw800 drive before, but only when there's no fw400 drives on the same buss. Splitting it between an internal and external drive should get you there safely.
psycho_monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2010   #5
Lives for gear
 
jpupo74's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: Colombia / Montreal
Posts: 1,310

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by psycho_monkey View Post
I've run 64 tracks at 96k from one fw800 drive before, but only when there's no fw400 drives on the same buss. Splitting it between an internal and external drive should get you there safely.
Ive also been searchin on the Reaper forum. I friend of mine told me the best solution was an SSD, Ill try the external FW first since I have some. About the buss.

I have a PCM CIA FW card on my laptop. So you recommend an external drive using that crad and the Mytek connected via FW on the computer FW port?

Thanks,
Pupo
jpupo74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2010   #6
3 + infractions, forum membership suspended.
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 7,120

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpupo74 View Post
Hi,
Is anyone around here mixing projects which have between 50 and 64 tracks in 96kHz? If so, what computers are you using? I just sawpped to Reaper and there are lots of glitches. I cannot even hit play without one single plugin.

Intel core 2 Duo 3GB of RAM.
Also tried in a Laptop Intel core duo almost 3 GHZ, 4 RAM
MacBookPro Intel core 2 duo, 2 RAM.

Thanks,
Pupo

I've done over 200 tracks at 96/24
compaq dc7900 quad core 6600
3 gig ram. The big difference is I use 15k harddisks
that is the key to large track counts
robertshaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2010   #7
Lives for gear
 
jpupo74's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: Colombia / Montreal
Posts: 1,310

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by robertshaw View Post
I've done over 200 tracks at 96/24
compaq dc7900 quad core 6600
3 gig ram. The big difference is I use 15k harddisks
that is the key to large track counts
Hi robertshaw!
Thanks for your input.
Can you please specify which hard drives?
Cheers,
Pupo
jpupo74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2010   #8
Gear addict
 
dub3000's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 462

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpupo74 View Post
Hi,
Is anyone around here mixing projects which have between 50 and 64 tracks in 96kHz? If so, what computers are you using? I just sawpped to Reaper and there are lots of glitches. I cannot even hit play without one single plugin.

Intel core 2 Duo 3GB of RAM.
Also tried in a Laptop Intel core duo almost 3 GHZ, 4 RAM
MacBookPro Intel core 2 duo, 2 RAM.

Thanks,
Pupo
have you run dpclat on your systems to make sure they don't have anything weird on there? (e.g. wireless internet, antivirus, or power saving modes will cripple your performance).

what plugins did you try? stuff like reaEq is really low on cpu even at 96khz.

you may simply need to use a larger buffer size. what's your audio buffer size? (and you're using ASIO, right?)
dub3000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2010   #9
Gear addict
 
dub3000's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 462

(also... just out of interest, what do you hope to gain by working at 96khz? i only ever do that if i want to pull a decent sound out of one of a couple of old weird VSTis i have that don't internally oversample... most modern plugins already do that for you)
dub3000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2010   #10
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 659

When you go to hit play whats happening exactly ? The type of error would give some indication of where the problem is..

if its just skipping but trying to play its probably throughput speed, if its locking up altogether or if its crashing/closing the program its probably Reaper...
ebulb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2010   #11
Lives for gear
 
jpupo74's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: Colombia / Montreal
Posts: 1,310

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by dub3000 View Post
have you run dpclat on your systems to make sure they don't have anything weird on there? (e.g. wireless internet, antivirus, or power saving modes will cripple your performance).

what plugins did you try? stuff like reaEq is really low on cpu even at 96khz.

you may simply need to use a larger buffer size. what's your audio buffer size? (and you're using ASIO, right?)
Hi dub3000,
Yes I run dpclat, its all good. I mainly use reaEq, I was "trying to use" a couple Orange Eqs from Algorithmix (I know these are hard on CPU), and 2048 buffer size.


Quote:
Originally Posted by dub3000 View Post
(also... just out of interest, what do you hope to gain by working at 96khz? i only ever do that if i want to pull a decent sound out of one of a couple of old weird VSTis i have that don't internally oversample... most modern plugins already do that for you)
I do heara differcne working at 96kHz. Feel sirght for me. But I think after all thses issues I will not use it again for a project where I have to do lots of processing.

Cheers,
Pupo
jpupo74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2010   #12
Lives for gear
 
jpupo74's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: Colombia / Montreal
Posts: 1,310

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by ebulb View Post
When you go to hit play whats happening exactly ? The type of error would give some indication of where the problem is..

if its just skipping but trying to play its probably throughput speed, if its locking up altogether or if its crashing/closing the program its probably Reaper...
Hi ebulb,
When I hit play nothing happens (I guess its buffering). After 4 seconds or so it plays and stops with lots of glitches and the transport bar starts turning red and blinking. It has only crahs once and I think because I was pissed and forced it.

Cheers,
Pupo
jpupo74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2010   #13
Lives for gear
 
norbury brook's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Location: London
Posts: 925

I've got a 52 trak project running at the moment in Reaper at 96k,at 1.5 ms latency no problems. You need good/32/64 meg buffer hard drives though, cpu isn't an issue it's what your drive can stream.


i7 920/6 gig 1600 mhz ram/gigabyte EP58-UD5/4x samsung spin point F3's



MC
norbury brook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2010   #14
3 + infractions, forum membership suspended.
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 7,120

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpupo74 View Post
Hi robertshaw!
Thanks for your input.
Can you please specify which hard drives?
Cheers,
Pupo
Seagate Cheetah
robertshaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2010   #15
Gear addict
 
dub3000's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 462

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpupo74 View Post
Hi,
Is anyone around here mixing projects which have between 50 and 64 tracks in 96kHz? If so, what computers are you using? I just sawpped to Reaper and there are lots of glitches. I cannot even hit play without one single plugin.

Intel core 2 Duo 3GB of RAM.
Also tried in a Laptop Intel core duo almost 3 GHZ, 4 RAM
MacBookPro Intel core 2 duo, 2 RAM.
there might be some tweaks you can do to improve performance in that kind of situation - i remember someone posting about long delays on startup with gigantic projects. search the forums?
dub3000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2010   #16
Lives for gear
 
DivineMusic's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Location: Hotlanta
Posts: 2,120

Send a message via Yahoo to DivineMusic
currently mixing a song with 64 tracks at 24/96 in nuendo 4
no issues what so ever.
not running on 2-3 harddrives.. the session and audiofiles are all on my mail 1.5tb drive(Seagate Barracuda 7200.11)
currently have 2 1.5tb drives in my daw with 1 500gig drive as the os drive.

i7 920, gigabyte ga-x58a-ud3r, 6gig of ocz gold ram,gigabyte 5570 1gig video card, steinberg mr816csx,lucid 88192 etc
__________________
DivineMusic 2-23-07 ppl wanna praise protools like its the best thing since pu$$y fuuck
DivineMusic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th March 2010   #17
Lives for gear
 
jpupo74's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: Colombia / Montreal
Posts: 1,310

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by DivineMusic View Post
currently mixing a song with 64 tracks at 24/96 in nuendo 4
no issues what so ever.
not running on 2-3 harddrives.. the session and audiofiles are all on my mail 1.5tb drive(Seagate Barracuda 7200.11)
currently have 2 1.5tb drives in my daw with 1 500gig drive as the os drive.

i7 920, gigabyte ga-x58a-ud3r, 6gig of ocz gold ram,gigabyte 5570 1gig video card, steinberg mr816csx,lucid 88192 etc
Hey Divine Music,
Are you overclocking the 920?
Cheers,
Pupo
jpupo74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th March 2010   #18
Gear nut
 
Fuseburn's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 136

Tried increasing the disk read buffer ? Preferences - Buffer - Advanced Options
Try just increasing the number of disk buffers from 3 to 6.
It'll take longer now until playback starts, but your glitches should be better - you need to fiddle around with it until you're fine.

Not having that kind of problems anymore since I'm back on Desktop PC with SATA-drives (no raid, just standard Samsung Spinpoint F1/F3s with 1 TB9
Fuseburn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th March 2010   #19
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,243

Often mix projects @ 96K with over 60 trks sometime 80+ when there's lots of BVS.

I use Nuendo, Lynx AES16 cards and a Q6600 Quad core with SATA II drives.
No problems, plenty of horsepower.
At E.J's studio we use Nuendo, RME Madi and AMD Dual 6 cores with 16 gigs of ram. This thing's a monster.
kellyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th March 2010   #20
Lives for gear
 
rogerbrain's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2009
Location: atlanta
Posts: 1,487

Mac pro dual quad 2.8 with 16gig ram (does not matter tho as I am still at 32bit on all my projects so it is acctually using 4 gig) logic 9.1 (running at 32bit still)
have WD velociraptor hard drives ..motu hd192 (two of them)

72 plus tracks with eq and comp plugs ... fast and glitch free.

I really think the hard drives help ..seperate for files and programs
__________________
Good Reverb Takes Time

Roger Brainard
www.rogerbrainard.com
rogerbrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th March 2010   #21
Lives for gear
 
jpupo74's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: Colombia / Montreal
Posts: 1,310

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by rogerbrain View Post
Mac pro dual quad 2.8 with 16gig ram (does not matter tho as I am still at 32bit on all my projects so it is acctually using 4 gig) logic 9.1 (running at 32bit still)
have WD velociraptor hard drives ..motu hd192 (two of them)

72 plus tracks with eq and comp plugs ... fast and glitch free.

I really think the hard drives help ..seperate for files and programs
Yeah, th ethink is that Ive tried everything except tqeaking more my PC BIOS and config, I am searching for more stuff ti see what should I disable cause I think Im missing something. I am about to lace an order on a new system though, an overclocked 920 witha Gigabyte mobo, 2 SSD's one for OS one for mixing, a raid to record, a raid to backup and 6 of RAM, should be way more than I need but I wanna play it safe.

I havent been in the studio for a week now, doing paperwork and planning some recording. Ill try again todat and see what happens.

Cheers and thanks!
Pupo
jpupo74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th March 2010   #22
Gear Head
 
mroekalea's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2008
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 40

If the problem is diskperformance (which i'm thinking) you can try this scenario:

1] Remove or move not used content from the disk to backupmedia (usb harddrive or similar).

2] Also move the project directory to another location (physical harddrive).

3] Make sure you have a minimal of 70% free space available.

4] Now defragment the drive.

5] Copy the project directory back to the defragmented drive.


Disk performance on fast disk will suffer if the total use comes above 85% depending on the fragmentationlevel. Using the series of instruction above you can improve your disk troughput as the audio project files are copied back to a not defragged drive and thus are copied contigues to de harddrive which gives less seektimes.

This is not a permanent solution as it is labour intensive, but still a workable work-a-round.

Let us (me) know if you consider this.

Menoj
mroekalea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th March 2010   #23
Lives for gear
 
jpupo74's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: Colombia / Montreal
Posts: 1,310

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by mroekalea View Post
If the problem is diskperformance (which i'm thinking) you can try this scenario:

1] Remove or move not used content from the disk to backupmedia (usb harddrive or similar).

2] Also move the project directory to another location (physical harddrive).

3] Make sure you have a minimal of 70% free space available.

4] Now defragment the drive.

5] Copy the project directory back to the defragmented drive.


Disk performance on fast disk will suffer if the total use comes above 85% depending on the fragmentationlevel. Using the series of instruction above you can improve your disk troughput as the audio project files are copied back to a not defragged drive and thus are copied contigues to de harddrive which gives less seektimes.

This is not a permanent solution as it is labour intensive, but still a workable work-a-round.

Let us (me) know if you consider this.

Menoj
Hi Menoj,
I already formated the drive , 500Gb Seagate Barracuda (might be the problem) and didnt work. There was plenty of space in the drive!
Thanks,
Pupo
jpupo74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th March 2010   #24
Lives for gear
 
jpupo74's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: Colombia / Montreal
Posts: 1,310

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuseburn View Post
Tried increasing the disk read buffer ? Preferences - Buffer - Advanced Options
Try just increasing the number of disk buffers from 3 to 6.
It'll take longer now until playback starts, but your glitches should be better - you need to fiddle around with it until you're fine.

Not having that kind of problems anymore since I'm back on Desktop PC with SATA-drives (no raid, just standard Samsung Spinpoint F1/F3s with 1 TB9
Yeah, didn't work man...
Thanks,
Pupo
jpupo74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th March 2010   #25
Lives for gear
 
jpupo74's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: Colombia / Montreal
Posts: 1,310

Thread Starter
Updates...

Dudes,
I still don't understand.
I just bought the SoundToys bundle and as soon as I open a Decapitator and a Echoboy the glitches start in a 22 audio track 44.1 kHz session!!!!
How the *$&/ is this related to disk read speed?
This is getting very confusing.
Do you think it could be the fact that I'm using a Mytek 8x192 via FireWire?
Thanks,
Pupo
jpupo74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th March 2010   #26
Gear nut
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: Cologne, Germany
Posts: 96

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpupo74 View Post
Dudes,
I still don't understand.
I just bought the SoundToys bundle and as soon as I open a Decapitator and a Echoboy the glitches start in a 22 audio track 44.1 kHz session!!!!
How the *$&/ is this related to disk read speed?
This is getting very confusing.
Do you think it could be the fact that I'm using a Mytek 8x192 via FireWire?
Thanks,
Pupo

Reaper needs some adjusting with the playback buffers, browse the reaper forum for this, then it will run great.

Also when you´re on W7, you have to disable Coreparking, this info you´ll find in the Sonar forum..

good luck..
submarin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th March 2010   #27
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,114

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpupo74 View Post
Dudes,
I still don't understand.
I just bought the SoundToys bundle and as soon as I open a Decapitator and a Echoboy the glitches start in a 22 audio track 44.1 kHz session!!!!
How the *$&/ is this related to disk read speed?
This is getting very confusing.
Do you think it could be the fact that I'm using a Mytek 8x192 via FireWire?
Thanks,
Pupo
hae you bothered to run a benchmark on the drives?
sisoft sandra or HDtach.
sound like you may have a bad drive if it would not format...

Scott
ADK
jcschild is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
How do I export several Battery drum tracks to individual audio tracks? LonDonsen Music computers 5 11th December 2009 05:35 PM
master edits (dj mix into 10 tracks for disc, plus encoding artist name to tracks) ScottAltiz Mastering forum 1 30th May 2009 08:41 PM
Pro Tools LE, importing tracks recorded at 96kHZ. _nate_ Music computers 3 17th November 2007 01:17 AM
To record 16-24 tracks AT ONCE at 96Khz on Nuendo... Saudade Music computers 15 4th April 2006 03:40 AM
how much delay should you add to dry tracks.. with respect to wet tracks?? activexjava High end 8 31st March 2006 05:53 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:46 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.