[top]) Ur funny

Ruudman · 27th October 2005

Aargh, got caught up in work and my overlap plan failed (installed 1980 3 days before the 1970 demo ran out). Didn't get a chance to compare them on drumbus.

In general, a have a better feeling about the 1980.
Opinions???

ruudman

T_R_S · 28th October 2005

Wait till January for the Chandler

midiman123 · 28th October 2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ruudman

Aargh, got caught up in work and my overlap plan failed (installed 1980 3 days before the 1970 demo ran out). Didn't get a chance to compare them on drumbus.

In general, a have a better feeling about the 1980.
Opinions???ruudman

I actually like the 1970 better!
Without comparing the plugs to the "real thing", I personally have fallen for the smooth sound that I think the 1970 gives me, compared to the 1980.
I use it on the drum buss, snare etc, and also liked it better as a master buss as well.

But that could have something to do with that it fits my type of music better??

I havent really made up my mind regarding the 1980....right now I think it`s to..."harsh"?

KK

Ruudman · 28th October 2005

Thanks.
I'm all for the '70's vibe, just got a feeling that this plug was up for a task too big.
But SSL is kind of gritty, maybe easier to emulate in a plug.

I might wait for Chandler..

When I've done shootouts with my various comp plugs vs URS, I rediscovered
an old freebie: D3. I got it to work really good in certain situations. A plug from '98 or something...!

ruudman

cebolao · 28th October 2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by T_R_S

Wait till January for the Chandler

is CHANDLER planning fo release a plugin compressor?

Ruudman · 28th October 2005

Yupp, nice isn't it? thumbsup

ruudman

cebolao · 28th October 2005

cool...

why have i just bought their TG-1?

any info on this plug? no news on their site

pigpen · 28th October 2005

I dig em both...actually like the 70 in most cases better, especially on 2 Buss, but the 80 is cool for drums

TheSweetener · 28th October 2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by cebolao

cool...

why have i just bought their TG-1?

any info on this plug? no news on their site

Just do a search. There have been some threads about it.

midiman123 · 28th October 2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ruudman

Thanks.
I'm all for the '70's vibe, just got a feeling that this plug was up for a task too big.
But SSL is kind of gritty, maybe easier to emulate in a plug.

I might wait for Chandler..

ruudman

I got the URS eq`s, & comps cos I think they sound fantastic,
but I will definitely buy the Chandler as well, to match with my TG Channel.(I bet it`s gonna sound amazing!!!)
U can`t have to many, at least not when it comes to quality plugs

KK

theother · 28th October 2005

I'd like to see a SSL channelstrip (different than the quad compressor) and a DBX160 compressor from URS!

Ruudman · 28th October 2005

I bet you'll see an SSL strip from SSL themselves...can't tell you more..

ruudman

git345 · 30th October 2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ruudman

I bet you'll see an SSL strip from SSL themselves...can't tell you more..

ruudman

C'mon you can tell us!

jdunn · 30th October 2005

He pretty much just did. I wonder if it will be modeled after the 9000K, or if it will be a switchable E/G thing like the AWS900? McDSP already did the Channel G, and URS has their S EQ, which is the 4000.

It's cool though because the SSL plugs will likely be native if their free release of the LMC is any indication. Channel G is TDM/RTAS only. I need Audio Units for Logic 7 Pro.

I look forward to the SSL plugin offerings. That LMC has some mojo for sure. Thanks again for that little treat! thumbsup

AnalogBob · 31st October 2005

I also look forward for the the real deal from SSL. Native all the way.

max cooper · 4th November 2005

After working with both of these, I gotta say that I think the 1980 is a lot more useable to me than the '70.

And I was really looking forward to the '70 being the answer to my plugin compressor prayers.

But I've been coming to a realization that I don't like to 'chew up' my sounds as much as the 1970 seems to. And as I've mentioned, I never use the 1176 on anything other than 4:1, so take that into consideration.

But it just seems that the 1970 destroys the sound too much. Just my silly 'ol opinion.

pigpen · 4th November 2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by max cooper

After working with both of these, I gotta say that I think the 1980 is a lot more useable to me than the '70.

And I was really looking forward to the '70 being the answer to my plugin compressor prayers.

But I've been coming to a realization that I don't like to 'chew up' my sounds as much as the 1970 seems to. And as I've mentioned, I never use the 1176 on anything other than 4:1, so take that into consideration.

But it just seems that the 1970 destroys the sound too much. Just my silly 'ol opinion.

Funny how one man's fodder is another's gold....I feel the exact opposite!

Maybe you can tell me how to make the SSL sound good on the 2 Buss. i find it usefull on the drum sub. I really want it to be cool, but I have not figured it out yet I guess....How are you using it?
I love the 70....but I wanna love the 80's too!

midiman123 · 4th November 2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by pigpen

Funny how one man's fodder is another's gold....I feel the exact opposite!

Maybe you can tell me how to make the SSL sound good on the 2 Buss. i find it usefull on the drum sub. I really want it to be cool, but I have not figured it out yet I guess....How are you using it?
I love the 70....but I wanna love the 80's too!

He, he...
I agree!
I love the 70 to

I actually think the 80 is "chewing" up my sound to much..
I just cant get used to it like I can with the 70.
But maybe that time will come where I just loooove the 80:-)

KK

Ruudman · 4th November 2005

I agree with Max.
Plus the 1980 has some graininess to it, as the original has.

The 1970's wearing a shirt that's one size too big, I might prefer Channel G in
Api mode (forward feedback)

ruudman

max cooper · 4th November 2005

Yeah, to each his own, right?

I wouldn't use either on the 2Bus, personally.

Ruudman · 4th November 2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ruudman

I might prefer Channel G in
Api mode (forward feedback)
ruudman

... for drumbus.

I use no main bus compression at the moment..

I have to admit I have reached the lowest level by quoting myself.

ruudman

jdunn · 5th November 2005

Did you download the screenshot of Kenny's Channel Strip SSL preset. It's up on that thread at the marsh now.

Harley-OIART · 5th November 2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ruudman

... for drumbus.

I use no main bus compression at the moment..

I have to admit I have reached the lowest level by quoting myself.

ruudman

[top]) Ur funny

)

I am all to glad to be able to back you up when saying Channel G is the preference for my work as well. What a great plugin.

Cheers man,
Scott

theother · 5th November 2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by jdunn

Did you download the screenshot of Kenny's Channel Strip SSL preset. It's up on that thread at the marsh now.

I don't understand a word!

How's Kenny?? and where can I see the screenshot? And what channel strip?

sorry for sounding dumb!

Ruudman · 5th November 2005

There are two Kennys
- one that is dead or about to be
- one alive and kicking mister, produceher

The latter one once made a "legendary" Channel Strip preset named "SSL".
This has only been revealed to the Digi Knights, but now a photo has been posted on www. The secret is no secret anymore..

ruudman, TDM Jedi

theother · 5th November 2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ruudman

There are two Kennys
- one that is dead or about to be
- one alive and kicking mister, produceher

The latter one once made a "legendary" Channel Strip preset named "SSL".
This has only been revealed to the Digi Knights, but now a photo has been posted on www. The secret is no secret anymore..

ruudman, TDM Jedi

www.?

theother, ex-TDM, now Cubase SX Jedi

Ruudman · 5th November 2005

http://marsh.prosoundweb.com/index.php/m/0/7832/16/

ruudman

27th October 2005	#1
Ruudman Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Norway Posts: 3,079 Thread Starter	URS 1970 vs 1980 Aargh, got caught up in work and my overlap plan failed (installed 1980 3 days before the 1970 demo ran out). Didn't get a chance to compare them on drumbus. In general, a have a better feeling about the 1980. Opinions??? ruudman __________________ Working Class Hero Visit this website of Noma Children Hospital Sokoto

28th October 2005	#8
pigpen Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Athens, GA- US Posts: 2,322	I dig em both...actually like the 70 in most cases better, especially on 2 Buss, but the 80 is cool for drums __________________ Me- "You know he's not playing in key right?" Unnamed Producer A- "Really?....Uh, Does that matter?" Me- sigh...."In all other cases, Yes, in this one...I guess not so much." http://pigpenstudios.net http://www.myspace.com/pigpenstudios

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Should I get the Waves SSL bundle or the URS S Eq and 1980 Comp?	mhartman	High end	17	13th September 2006 02:07 AM
URS 1980 hanging PT	kats	Music computers	1	13th April 2006 11:33 AM
URS 1970 = Low freq ringing?	guerillamixer	So much gear, so little time!	3	13th February 2006 04:05 PM

28th October 2005	#2
T_R_S Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Canuk Posts: 5,163	Wait till January for the Chandler

28th October 2005	#7
cebolao Lives for gear Join Date: May 2003 Location: warsaw, poland Posts: 501	cool... why have i just bought their TG-1? any info on this plug? no news on their site

28th October 2005	#11
theother Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 2,086	I'd like to see a SSL channelstrip (different than the quad compressor) and a DBX160 compressor from URS!

30th October 2005	#14
jdunn Head of Bumping Security (B.S) Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: in the hills of Southern California Posts: 2,944	He pretty much just did. I wonder if it will be modeled after the 9000K, or if it will be a switchable E/G thing like the AWS900? McDSP already did the Channel G, and URS has their S EQ, which is the 4000. It's cool though because the SSL plugs will likely be native if their free release of the LMC is any indication. Channel G is TDM/RTAS only. I need Audio Units for Logic 7 Pro. I look forward to the SSL plugin offerings. That LMC has some mojo for sure. Thanks again for that little treat! thumbsup

31st October 2005	#15
AnalogBob Gear addict Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 490	I also look forward for the the real deal from SSL. Native all the way.

4th November 2005	#16
max cooper Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: tx Posts: 8,802	After working with both of these, I gotta say that I think the 1980 is a lot more useable to me than the '70. And I was really looking forward to the '70 being the answer to my plugin compressor prayers. But I've been coming to a realization that I don't like to 'chew up' my sounds as much as the 1970 seems to. And as I've mentioned, I never use the 1176 on anything other than 4:1, so take that into consideration. But it just seems that the 1970 destroys the sound too much. Just my silly 'ol opinion.

5th November 2005	#22
jdunn Head of Bumping Security (B.S) Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: in the hills of Southern California Posts: 2,944	Did you download the screenshot of Kenny's Channel Strip SSL preset. It's up on that thread at the marsh now.