![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 527
Thread Starter | Why Sequoia is a better DAW than most This Jeff Sheridan interview just got posted today on Youtube. He does a demonstration of his new DAW. Any opinions, is it as good as he says? Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Dream Catcher | Sequoia is a great Daw. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Boston
Posts: 3,352
| Does it sound anallog? |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear Guru Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 14,237
| |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Greater San Francisco
Posts: 2,108
| |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Ashland, OR
Posts: 1,128
| What would make Sequoia better than say, Adobe Audition 3.0? |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 319
| But still in crappy Windows right? |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Boston
Posts: 3,352
| |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Turkey
Posts: 1,863
| Best protools bash ever! ![]() |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 319
| well, I think the video is cool but: Come on we can convert any audio file into Protools and will take just few secs!! so that is just not a huge difference. The coloring thing...great..but not something I would die for. The audio quality I heard is better than many DAWs...but never checked that! Now , may be a bad ass DAW...but really Windows turn me off! Such a crappy OS, all cluttered, with time gets all ****ed up , u may need to reformat and reinstall your windows, defrag every week, get yummy viruses, cheese look. I hate Windows! ![]() |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Lives for gear | I think that the Source/destination edit mode and Crossfade editor are very very powerful tools. I sure would like Sequoia for Mac, though. |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,483
| Quote:
![]() Which version of windows? I have been running windows without a firewall installed for over 4 years, not one virus. I reformat once a year. Its a great practice. I do it on my Mac as well. Like a spring cleaning. Start alll new. I have found most incompetent computer users hate Windows.
__________________ R Ashley | |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 901
| well Sequoia is basically the same thing as Samplitude when it comes to most audio work, sort of like Cubase/Nuendo. I just started digging into it a few days ago, watched all the videos on the site and digging into the manual....and I must say....this is a great DAW. The Obejct oriented stuff is great, taking snapshots of different mix set ups, the range manager, being able to master and burn CDs, great built in plugs...etc, just all around good stuff. I was trying to find a different DAW to use other than Protools LE, because even though I like Protools, the lack of delay compensation and the inability to freeze tracks to save resources made me start looking elsewhere. (I'll still probably do my tracking in Protools though, and consolidate the tracks and import them to Samplitude for mixing and mastering). Cubase has some nice features too, but I hate the feel of it.... Samplitude has most of the features I like about Cubase plus more. I'm definitely making the switch... I don't see why more people aren't using it. Must be poor marketing. |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 712
| Maybe. But don't use it in sample rate conversion capacity: SRC Comparisons Check all versions 8-10. Not something to rely on. For contrast, check against Pro Tools HD or iZotope 64-bit.
__________________ SaOvI | mUsIc |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Turkey
Posts: 1,863
| Quote:
![]() | |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Greater San Francisco
Posts: 2,108
| the coolness that is... |
| | |
| | #17 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Ashland, OR
Posts: 1,128
| Quote:
While people fuss about some OS's being superior, real musicians are using whatever works and produce works far better than most people who are concerned about "brands" will ever accomplish. Meaning, right now, somewhere in the world, some kid is running circles around your own prowess simply because theyre gettin it done. And 9 times out of 10, its done on PC to be honest. Its a severe waste of time to argue about Mac vs. PC. ~ get back to making music, produce something good, then talk about the virtues of your OS. Thank you.
__________________ ~ Original Reggae Music etc ~ (fixed my links!) All instruments by RasCricket: "Ska One" http://soundclick.com/share.cfm?id=8034079 Cricket does Michael Jackson's "Human Nature" (AmpedSounds.com "2009 Song of the Year"): http://soundclick.com/share.cfm?id=7931344 Nylon string electric/Latin/Flamenco guitar: http://soundclick.com/share.cfm?id=7863478 | |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Ashland, OR
Posts: 1,128
| Most if not all these features in Sequoia are already in Audition 3.0. Its good they caught up |
| | |
| | #19 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Greater San Francisco
Posts: 2,108
| Quote:
no I used to use Audition. Love some of the tools thumbsup It's not even close. I work in a studio where 3 different DAWs are used regularly. Sampliquoia is clearly the best.
__________________ J Andrews Studio E Chief Engineer "I can't afford to die... it would ruin my image." -Jack Lalanne RIP | |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: N.Y.
Posts: 978
| |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: WI
Posts: 400
| |
| | |
| | #22 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Ashland, OR
Posts: 1,128
| Quote:
Awesome, then it should be easy for you to detail why Sequoia is so much better. I for one, could use the convincing. Also, you cant deny that many of those features were in Audition 3.0 first. So im totally right in saying "its good they caught up". And im talking 3.0 - you mention Audition here at Gearslutz, and most replies involve, "oh I havent used it since 1.5 or 2.0". So if its such a clear cut issue, detailing a few reasons that would satisy my curiosity might be easy for ya. If you get a minute, enlighten me. ![]() | |
| | |
| | #23 | ||
| Lives for gear | Quote:
Quote:
__________________ www.iwilllookunderthisrock.com | ||
| | |
| | #24 |
| Dream Catcher | Sequoia just sounds so much better than Audition. I use both extensively. |
| | |
| | #25 |
| Gear addict | sequoia (and samplitude) have been used for mastering for quite some time so i'm curious as to what features they've added recently that audition 3 had first.
__________________ Trench Town 4 Life www.reverbnation.com/lostangelzproductions www.myspace.com/lostangelzprod www.lostangelzproductions.com |
| | |
| | #26 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Greater San Francisco
Posts: 2,108
| yes it is... Cubendo & Sequiatude are just as serious products as PT. ...and are better bang-for-the-buck. Even with Sequioa's price tag at $3000.00 Quote:
The first audio app I owned was CoolEdit. Samplitude has been around since 1992. It is considered as the first DAW to do non-destructive editing. The whole object-based thing came from their way of dealing with the pitiful horsepower of computers of the time. "Sampie" still can record audio direct to RAM. Many of the features in the vid may look Cool Edit-style, but trust me, they've been in Samplitude for a very long time. | |
| | |
| | #27 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 756
| |
| | |
| | #28 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Over myself
Posts: 929
| Quote:
No VST support until 3 years ago, perhaps less. It records to RAM? But can you span the records into different drives? | |
| | |
| | #29 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,373
| Coughcoughmacdouchescough |
| | |
| | #30 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 257
| i think i'll end up opening a topic called "why sequoia (or any other daw for that matter) is NOT the better daw" ...haven't we had that stupid discussion over and over again on GS? it's almost as bad as the mac vs. pc thread, and just as empty and useless, almost as empty and useless as kreeper6's coming out as the better troll just above. |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Samplitude/Sequoia 11 | Tube World | Product Alerts older than 2 months | 28 | 10th September 2009 12:46 AM |
| Does anybody use Sequoia ? | Sinewave | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 28 | 4th July 2008 07:41 PM |
| Samp and Sequoia 9.02 is out... | fifthcircle | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 6 | 24th January 2007 01:36 AM |
| Samp and Sequoia | DivineMusic | Music computers | 7 | 15th December 2006 03:45 PM |
| |