![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Feb 2009 Location: New York
Posts: 217
Thread Starter | Waves CLA classic compressors or Waves SSL?
The only EQ/Comp plugins I regularly use besides Logic stock plugs are IK Fairchild and IK Pultec emulations which I find to both be excellent, especially for the price. But it's upgrade time! I'm debating between the Waves SSL and Waves CLA classic compressors. My gut is saying that the CLA compressors collection could round out my mixes so that I have SOLID compression for everything in a rock/pop arrangement. The Waves SSL on the other hand, would give me a unique and classic EQ. But in terms of compression, I think I'll have a less varied palate to work with, which could make things difficult in certain applications. The vocal and acoustic guitar compression just blew my mind on the CLA Waves video. Whereas I was originally ready to buy the Waves SSl bundle, I'm now restrategizing. So what do you guys think? CLA compressors (possibly adding in The Glue to have solid buss compression) or SSL bundle? I know neither are end-all solutions, but what's the best route to go for now, considering I won't have cash for another bundle soon? |
| | |
| | #2 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2006 Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 897
| Quote:
So yes.. I believe it's a difficult scenario, since you can't really compare the 2 bundles. If I HAD to chose, I chose the Waves SSL bundle, but that's because I can't live without the SSL channel and I do love the bus compressor on the 2bus.
__________________ Check out Ricardo Munoz his first official release on Youtube! | |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,536
|
If I had to choose, it would be the SSL.. since you get EQ and comps with it whereas with CLA, it's only comps/limiters. But yeah, it's a hard decision to make. Or get the Waves SSL and the new Tubetech plugin...
__________________ THE MPCIST ![]() |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Gear maniac Joined: Feb 2009 Location: New York
Posts: 217
Thread Starter | Quote:
SSL bundle seems like it could make more sense but the CLA bundle just sounds soooo good. I don't even know that I could afford both, but if I spent the cash, would it be a combo that I could really go to town with and avoid other plug-in purchases for a while? And I find the IK Pultec EQ works well in a lot of situations, except surgical applications and the lower-mid range. If I buy the CLA bundle, what practical EQ applications am I missing out on? | |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear nut Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 109
|
As of right now, it looks like you can still pick up the Waves SSL bundle from music123.com for only $478. This is a good deal but won't last long. The Waves 25% off special technically ended yesterday --- so, if you want it, go grab it ASAP.
|
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
Good Luck | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Oct 2007 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 226
|
I've got all the Waves plugs, Studio Classics, CLA, JJP etc. the SSL plugs I reach for the least of all of my waves plugs in that collection. the only exception is using the BusComp on the master bus but there are so many other great plug-ins you could use instead. I'd get CLA and save the money for API & or other good EQs
__________________ -- Big Evil Corp. -- |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Moderator Joined: Feb 2004 Location: Boston,MA Providence,RI
Posts: 15,921
|
This is an impossible decision... You have to get both. |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Feb 2009 Location: New York
Posts: 217
Thread Starter |
Though the CLA bundle is much more flashy and exciting at the moment, I think it makes more sense to get the SSL first and work from there. Unless there are any more opinions, I'll be going that route at AES this friday. : ) |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Lives for gear |
I`m late to the party, what did you end up getting? For me... CLA for compression... API for EQ.
__________________ ernestbuckley.com The single from my next record, "Shes So Ready" You don`t need any more gear, you need to re-write the chorus. |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2007 Location: Germany
Posts: 1,613
|
I had to make the same decision a few days ago and bought the SSL. 3 days later I added the CLA comps... They complement each other very well. and ask Tony for a price!
|
| | |
| | #13 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 536
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #14 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
The new H Comp is awesome too... | |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2006 Location: Germany
Posts: 776
| CLA
If you're after some variety in high quality compression, get CLA. I own some 1176s and I could match hardware and plug-in - didn't hear a difference. I wouldn't have a problem selling my 1176s now that there's the CLA bundle. |
| | |
| | #16 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 776
| Quote:
edit: or i suppose the question would be -- do you hit the ssl plugs at a particular level that youve found to be optimal? or are you referring to the "crank the input, turn down the output" trick on the channel strip? or just proper staging so as to not overdrive anything in the chain? | |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Gear interested Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 14
| yes, could you elaborate on this please?
|
| | |
| | #18 |
| Gear nut |
I have just began demoing both... I use the SSL channel strip on practically every track. It is outrageous how much better it sounds than any other digital EQ I have used so far. The CLA compressors are nice too. I seem to have been using them slightly less, but still a lot. If I were you, I would get the SSL. The bus compressor is super useful in busses (who would have thought). I use the channel strip on practically everything. I use the dynamics to slightly compress each track, but nothing really noticeable. From there I follow the channel strip with a different compressor more suited to the instrument. Also, check the prices at sweetwater. They are much cheaper than most other retailers ($480 for the SSL native, $390 for the CLA native). About 4 months ago waves was charging $1k for the SSL native. I wonder what is with the substantial price cut. |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Feb 2009 Location: New York
Posts: 217
Thread Starter | |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 536
| There are much better prices out there than that at the moment until tomorrow.. (DutchMuzik/Tony B.)
|
| | |
| | #21 |
| Gear Head Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 63
|
Get them both. Seriously. They are the perfect companions and they are quite different beasts.
|
| | |
| | #22 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 527
| |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,145
|
i´d get softube fet
|
| | |
| | #24 |
| Gear addict Joined: Dec 2007 Location: Slovenia, EU
Posts: 445
| |
| | |
| | #25 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,145
| |
| | |
| | #26 |
| Gear addict Joined: Dec 2007 Location: Slovenia, EU
Posts: 445
|
I have both, also have Softube Tube-tech. I find that on more than 80% of material I do Waves CLA fit better (CLA-76 better than FET, and LA-2A better than Tube-tech). Softubes are great, but if I needed to choose on of the two it would be CLA without a doubt. But between SSL and CLA the decision would be based on my needs. SSL offers two great channel strips with RQ & dynamics and a super bus comp. If you have your eq's covered and aren't too nuts about SSL choose CLA. If you're looking for one package, that can beautifully cover most of your needs, choose SSL. My waves collection consist of studio classics, CLA, ren bundle and vocal rider. These cover 99% of my mixes, other than Sonnox SuperEsser (which is IMHO the best and most powerfull deesser I have ever tried). If I had to buy one, it would be Ren-bundle and later SSL. Ren-bundle is imho still one of the most versatile and best sounding bundles, with many upgrade paths for the future.
__________________ http://www.skupinaice.com |
| | |
| | #27 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2009 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,088
|
If anyone's interested, I posted a shootout between the Waves CLA-76 and the Softube FET Compressor. 1176 Plug-in Shootout: Waves CLA-76 vs Softube FET Compressor |
| | |
| | #28 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2006 Location: internet
Posts: 1,492
|
SSL channel is my favorite thing right now. It's pretty much on all of my tracks. I was *this* close to order myself a CLA bundle, but I bought a new mic instead (Beyerdynamic M500).
|
| | |
| | #29 |
| Gear addict Joined: Dec 2009 Location: Nashville
Posts: 428
|
I chose the SSL last month and I love it. Now I'm looking at the CLA or API bundle
|
| | |
| | #30 |
| Lives for gear |
I got both bundles and these are the most used plugins right now. They are simply excellent.
__________________ http://www.milaszewski.com/ |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Waves SSL 4000 CLA presets | NYMo | Music computers | 16 | 27th October 2009 05:46 PM |
| Waves SSL CLA presets don't show??? | msrecprod | Music computers | 2 | 30th August 2006 03:52 AM |
| Oooh another Waves SSL thread / Waves E-channel vs. MH Channelstrip | piccazzo | Music computers | 1 | 20th February 2006 03:06 PM |
| What happened to the 'WAVES The Waves SSL 4000 Collection on WEB SITE!!!' thread? | theother | Music computers | 15 | 9th February 2006 10:34 AM |
| |