Harrison Mixbus - Virtual Harrison Mixer plus full-featured DAW for OS X - Page 51 - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Music Computers

Harrison Mixbus - Virtual Harrison Mixer plus full-featured DAW for OS X
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 27th January 2010   #1501
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 712

Quote:
Originally Posted by dougb415 View Post
What a lame comment... Just because you haven't experienced them, so what? Others have had bugs with their PT HD systems. I'm a Logic user and there have been plenty of bugs in versions 8 & 9. I've had Logic crash in the middle of a tracking session. MixBus has only crashed on me a few times, and since I only use it as a mixing platform there is no panic and embarrassing moments, because I'm alone in the studio then.

This is the best $80 we've spent for our studio, period
So you're saying Mixbus are more stable than Logic, well good for you - 80 bugs well spend, I agree.

I don't know about Logic. But I know for sure that I have never heard of all these bugs from anyone I know who has a PTHD system.

Sure there are minor bugs in PTHD and I too know a few. But nothing that makes my computer crash like you or other good folks have mentioned earlier in this thread.

Sorry for the lame comment. I sure Mixbus will be great over time and I'm looking forward to try it out, when it becomes more stable AND if I can find a way to use it with Pro Tools.
__________________
Sorry for any bad grammar/spelling, I'm not from around here
lydpik is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2010   #1502
Lives for gear
 
dougb415's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: Huntsville AL
Posts: 837

Quote:
Originally Posted by lydpik View Post
So you're saying Mixbus are more stable than Logic, well good for you - 80 bugs well spend, I agree.
Not saying that at all - what I am saying is that all DAWs have bugs. To expect anything else is not realistic. However, my final mixes sound much better to me when I mix via MixBus. I make sure to Save often, and there are a couple other work-arounds that have to be done, but the results are worth it.

I am only running a demo studio and that also may factor into the small amount of problems I experience. I track in Logic, bounce individual WAV files out of Logic, import them into MixBus, do my final mix, export a mix WAV out MixBus, read that into Bias Peak, do any final edits & level settings, save that file and I'm done.

-Doug
__________________
Rockit Juice Audio

Lousy Rates - Bad Attitude - Killer Coffee

The home of Uncle Bethel. Come check out our reverbnation site!
dougb415 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2010   #1503
Gear addict
 
Fidelis's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: Sao Paulo - Brazil
Posts: 453

Send a message via Skype™ to Fidelis
Quote:
Originally Posted by dougb415 View Post
10 years vs how many months - 6? Was PT 1.0 perfectly stable? tutt
My first Protools was v 4.3 on an audiomedia card (two in/out). And it was totally stable. I bought this together with Logic (v.3 I think) cause Protools didn't have MIDI at that time. And I tell you that Logic was NEVER stable...

Quote:
Originally Posted by dougb415 View Post

I am only running a demo studio

-Doug
That's the point. For demo studioI'm shure it's fine and I know it sounds good!. But you don't want to have any piece of software quiting all the time in front of your clients. Don't get me wrong bro, I'm on your side too. I just hope it gets beteer, and better. We'll see how it goes.
Fidelis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2010   #1504
Gear Head
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 72

Make a backup of a session including externally refered files

Is there a possibility of save a consolidated version of a session, even when you started with files that mixbus didnt copy to his audio folder, and made a reference files instead? So you can be sure that all files are in place after unarchiving an archived session someday. Right now mixbus creates just 4kb wav files when the option of always copying files is not on. Is there an option that manually copies the files that had been referenced before?
Bartosz Idzi is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2010   #1505
Gear addict
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 317

Quote:
Originally Posted by IRONHEAD View Post
how did you get jack work with mixbus
my problem is if i run ardour by it self it start up fine without any problem but when i try to run mixbus i keep getting this msg
Ardour could not start JACK
There are several possible reason
You requested audio parameters that are notsupported..
2) JACk is running as another user.
Please consider the possibilities, and perhaps try different parameters.
Make sure you got the correct architecture of Mixbus then(PPC vs Intel). Otherwise get in touch with Harrison, I would suggest using the IRC method if you can. Instructions are in the download documentation.

Seablade
Seablade is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2010   #1506
Gear addict
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 317

Quote:
Originally Posted by bartosz idzi View Post
Is there a possibility of save a consolidated version of a session, even when you started with files that mixbus didnt copy to his audio folder, and made a reference files instead? So you can be sure that all files are in place after unarchiving an archived session someday. Right now mixbus creates just 4kb wav files when the option of always copying files is not on. Is there an option that manually copies the files that had been referenced before?
Not as of right now that I know of.

Seablade
Seablade is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st February 2010   #1507
Gear Head
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 72

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seablade View Post
Not as of right now that I know of.

Seablade
thanks a lot for your answer!

B
Bartosz Idzi is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st February 2010   #1508
Gear Head
 
lowen's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 74

Quote:
Originally Posted by lydpik View Post
PT has minor bugs here and there as all software has. But it's still the most stabile DAW out there.
And that was the meat of my comment. It's just that Pro Tools has been around that long, and there are still some (not too awful many, but some) bugs even after all that time.

Quote:
If Mixbus really sounds as good as people says, I wouldn't mind chance. But a stable system is the most important thing for me... Time is money.
I have run into a few quirks, but I'm not doing some of the things others have done (like tracking in Logic or something else and piping into Mixbus to get the mix engine; I'm tracking, editing, and mixing everything in Mixbus).

It has thus far been stable for me in many hours of use; the biggest problem I had was my making, while doing a backup that I accidentally did the wrong way.... The biggest issue I've had with Mixbus itself has been with some sessions that came from Ardour on Linux, and have some 'weird' properties that create some fun. The other issue I had was with a third party LADSPA plugin suite that had issues in that version.

And the sound, to me, has been worth it. It just sounds fantastic.

And, as you say, time is money. Mixbus has made me twice as fast (or faster) in getting the mix in the ballpark, saving me time.
lowen is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st February 2010   #1509
Lives for gear
 
sonicdefault's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,786

Does anyone know an easy way to remove a send from a channel. I can disconnect it no problem, but I thought there'd be an easy way to remove it (ie. within the right click option menu)

-SD
__________________
...My goal for many, many years was to obtain a beautiful API desk and be buried with it when I die...
vin-gear

...My 57 is only a few years old, but I'd like to think that someday my children can pass it down to their children.
Killahurts

...I would much rather tweak a moog than that thing bro...
MYAMS
sonicdefault is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st February 2010   #1510
Gear Head
 
bluefonia's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 61

Quote:
Does anyone know an easy way to remove a send from a channel. I can disconnect it no problem, but I thought there'd be an easy way to remove it (ie. within the right click option menu)
Just right-clik the send and click "delete"
bluefonia is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st February 2010   #1511
Gear addict
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 419

or hold shift and right-click it. That's a shortcut for deleting lots of stuff, including plugins, regions, and automation points. It's shown in the keyboard command "cheat sheet"

-Ben Loftis
Harrison Consoles
BenLoftis is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st February 2010   #1512
Lives for gear
 
sonicdefault's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,786

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluefonia View Post
Just right-clik the send and click "delete"
Quote:
Originally Posted by BenLoftis View Post
or hold shift and right-click it. That's a shortcut for deleting lots of stuff, including plugins, regions, and automation points. It's shown in the keyboard command "cheat sheet"

-Ben Loftis
Harrison Consoles
Thanks guys, that really helped! Maybe we should start a Mixbus Shortcuts thread

-SD
sonicdefault is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st February 2010   #1513
Lives for gear
 
sonicdefault's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,786

There's another thing that's alluded me, and it's automating channel mutes buttons. Am I overlooking something? I thought it would be the same as automating the channel faders. But when I put the channel in Write mode and perform the mutes... nothing happens when in Play mode.

I know I need to read the Ardour manual. I just kinda jumped right in. But I'm getting more serious with it now. After the next update, I think I'll be able to use MB very proficiently.

-SD
sonicdefault is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st February 2010   #1514
Gear addict
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 419

Hi sonicdefault,

Unfortunately the channel mutes aren't automatable. You can automate the assigns to the busses, though, which is sometimes good enough. Or you can automate the input trim, or use region gain curves to mute sections. Automatable mutes are already in the bleeding-edge version of Ardour, so they will appear in Mixbus eventually.

-BenLoftis
Harrison Consoles
BenLoftis is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 1st February 2010   #1515
Lives for gear
 
sonicdefault's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,786

Quote:
Originally Posted by BenLoftis View Post
Hi sonicdefault,

... Or you can automate the input trim, or use region gain curves to mute sections. Automatable mutes are already in the bleeding-edge version of Ardour, so they will appear in Mixbus eventually.

-BenLoftis
Harrison Consoles
Thanks. Last night I did resort to simply using gain curves.

-SD
sonicdefault is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 3rd February 2010   #1516
Gear interested
 
dumBass's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2

Damn! Been running MixBus 1.1 for a few weeks on a MacBook Pro (10.5.8) with great success.
Installed it on my studio computer (G5 Dual 1.8 running 10.4.11) and it won't launch.
It'll jump in the dock... then stop. Even went as far as reinstalling a fresh OS.
I read that when first running, it takes a few seconds to install the fonts. Maybe thats where it is hanging? Anyone else have this issue?
dumBass is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 3rd February 2010   #1517
Gear addict
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 419

hi DumBass

On 10.4.11, you have to be COMPLETELY updated to the latest OSX software. Just click on the Apple>Software Update menu, and get all the updates from Apple. This is explained in our FAQ.

If you don't do this, Mixbus will just bounce in the dock before launching.

Best Regards,
Ben Loftis
Harrison Consoles
BenLoftis is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 3rd February 2010   #1518
Gear interested
 
dumBass's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2

Thanks Ben!!! I didn't have all the latest and greatest from Apple...
... and thanks for the way-to-fast reply!!

2/4/10 update: installed all updates... it WORKS!!!
dumBass is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 3rd February 2010   #1519
Lives for gear
 
25ghosts's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 509

Quote:
Originally Posted by dougb415 View Post
Not saying that at all - what I am saying is that all DAWs have bugs. To expect anything else is not realistic.
Yeah - times we dwell in - sure are bad. My fingers are smoking these days writing bug reports. I think software makers should man-up and start getting their code solid. This whole software show is starting to remind me of of a freak show. Only really stable software around is Protools and Photoshop. Sure both have a few bugs but you can work with them on a pro level.

Bought Mixbus a while back and to my standards this software is still among the buggiest around. It even beats bias peak in unexpected behavior and THAT is a HAAARD thing to do.
__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
PT 8 HD|3 - Finally a Great Dark Interface
25ghosts is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2010   #1520
Gear Head
 
lowen's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 74

Quote:
Originally Posted by 25ghosts View Post
Yeah - times we dwell in - sure are bad.
The probability of a certain number of bugs is directly proportional to the number of lines of source code, inversely proportional to the age of the software, directly proportional to the speed of the development of new featues, and inversely proportional to the number of developers actively working on bugs. Whew.

At the same time, electromechanical systems are not immune to bugs; the very first 'bug' in fact was a moth stuck in a relay, and Admiral Grace Hopper coined the term. I certainly have seen my share of electromechanical bugs with various tape decks from Studer, Tascam/Teac, Ampex, and Otari. The difference is that preventive maintenance deals with most of those; but sometimes you do get that design flaw that you have to work around. I've seen a few with professional 2- and multi- track reels.

And many of those mechanical bugs are triggered by certain usage patterns; my usage pattern for a pair of old Ampex beasts at one radio station triggered some reelly odd issues, until I realized that just changing a few steps cleared the issue, which was a mechanical interference issue that was dependent upon the way the decks were mounted, and some pieces of the rack that should have been better fabricated.

Likewise, software bugs can be triggered by certain usage patterns; I've learned the patterns that have caused me the most issues with Mixbus (and I never really experienced lots of issues; Mixbus has operated very smoothly for me since I fixed an issue with a plugin I was having (which was the plugin's fault; an update and recompile of the plugin and things are fine)), and have found that when I use it in a slightly different way that it has become rock-solid in virtually all cases; haven't had an issue since I learned what I was doing that triggered an issue. Now, when the issue is fixed I'll check it, but, you know, working the other way isn't any less efficient, so I may just continue working this way, as I'm finding I'm just as productive doing things just a tad different.
lowen is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2010   #1521
Gear Head
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 72

FWIW...I finally spent some time mixing on MB last night, and the end result was a significantly better mix than what I've come to expect with other DAWs - the imaging, especially, was noticeably improved.
That said, I experienced a serious bug with using two UAD plugs on one of the busses - a loud, low oscillation that initially scared the shit out of me. I was able to avoid the issue by using just one plugin on each of the busses.
I'm eager for MB to work out the kinks, because it's a better sounding DAW than what I've grown used to.
mjau is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2010   #1522
Lives for gear
 
dougb415's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: Huntsville AL
Posts: 837

Quote:
Originally Posted by 25ghosts View Post
Bought Mixbus a while back and to my standards this software is still among the buggiest around. It even beats bias peak in unexpected behavior and THAT is a HAAARD thing to do.
I guess I'm a lightweight then. I've had a few crashes in MixBus, maybe one in Peak. My workflow:

Tracking - Logic - has bugs - rarely bother me
Mixing - MixBus - has bugs - rarely bother me
Final edits - Bias Peak - has bugs - rarely bother me

I've only had Logic crash once when a client was here. Luckily that was my wife! Now I hit Save more often and have not had any problems.

I just finished one project, and had the client in here to do some tracking this past Saturday. I did a prelim mix for him in Logic and he was happy with it. I imported the session into MixBus and did the final mix on Monday and Tuesday. I sent the final mix to him Tuesday night and he is ecstatic. He's already sent it around to some folks, and I am getting calls for more work.

All due to MixBus? No. But definitely a big part of the equation

-Doug
dougb415 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2010   #1523
Gear Head
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 33

Hey Ben Loftis,

Can I run Harrison Mixbus on a PPC Dual 1.8 with OS 10.5.8?
Sonic Supreme is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2010   #1524
Gear addict
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 419

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonic Supreme View Post
Can I run Harrison Mixbus on a PPC Dual 1.8 with OS 10.5.8?
Yes - any Dual is supported.
BenLoftis is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2010   #1525
Gear Head
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 33

Thanks Ben but I def wanna make sure that I can run it with that particular OS 10.5.8 because I use pro-tools & i can't really upgrade any further with that OS.
Sonic Supreme is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10th February 2010   #1526
Gear nut
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 105

a little late, but...

I forgot to come back and represent

Mixed in the Harrison Mixbus:

"Wonderful" on Soundcloud
audiopablo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10th February 2010   #1527
Lives for gear
 
25ghosts's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 509

Quote:
Originally Posted by audiopablo View Post
I forgot to come back and represent

Mixed in the Harrison Mixbus:

"Wonderful" on Soundcloud
You are definitely the winner of the loudness war... I have never seen a mix with less dynamics. 1 dB of dynamics... My meters weren't moving at all. ;-)
25ghosts is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10th February 2010   #1528
Lives for gear
 
dougb415's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: Huntsville AL
Posts: 837

Mixed in The Harrison MixBus:

"Not Just A Name On The Wall" by Earl Watts
dougb415 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10th February 2010   #1529
Gear nut
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 105

Quote:
Originally Posted by 25ghosts View Post
You are definitely the winner of the loudness war... I have never seen a mix with less dynamics. 1 dB of dynamics... My meters weren't moving at all. ;-)

dynamics


I'm smashing less these days...
audiopablo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10th February 2010   #1530
TRA
Lives for gear
 
TRA's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 869

Is there a plan for midi?
TRA is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
UAD/Harrison eq phillysoulman Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 41 8th July 2009 06:31 PM
Who can tell me about the Harrison HM-4 console? yumdrum High end 8 2nd March 2009 04:14 AM
Harrison 32 Series or Harrison MR3 niklassweden High end 10 6th May 2007 06:09 PM
Harrison Mixer DSMrehearsal High end 2 20th December 2006 11:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:40 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.