Windows XP :: 32 bit or 64 bit? - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Music computers


Windows XP :: 32 bit or 64 bit?

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 21st March 2009   #1
Gear Head
 
lacerta's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 42

Thread Starter
Windows XP :: 32 bit or 64 bit?

Or maybe vista even? Ive read qutie frequently that xp is 'more solid' than vista for audio production so ive kinda decided that route. so now should i go 32 or 64 bit? I use sonar and plan on using pro tools soon so im wondering how the software works with 64 bit now.

my computer:
ASUS p5n73-am
intel core 2 duo e7300
4 gigs of ram
lacerta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st March 2009   #2
Moderator
 
Blast9's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Location: London
Posts: 4,597

Sonar = 64 bit or so I understand.... therefore 64 bit version of XP would enable you to use more than 4GB of RAM thumbsup

PT -> I'm not sure but I believe 32 bit only!
__________________
::
New Album "Rooms" out now
http://www.andymitchellmusic.com
::
twitter > http://twitter.com/mitchellmusic - http://www.twitter.com/theyardbirds
Blast9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st March 2009   #3
Gear addict
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 480

I'm using XP 64 bit currently. Works just fine. I got 4 GB of RAM going and since I'm using a DAW that is Large Address Aware I decided to do it. Everything else though as far as other programs and plugs is still 32 bit.

Either 32 bit or 64 bit XP are excellent choices.
357mag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2009   #4
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 4,267

Quote:
Originally Posted by lacerta View Post
I use sonar and plan on using pro tools soon so im wondering how the software works with 64 bit now.
It doesn't. ProTools is only supported on 32-bit.
kafka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2009   #5
Lives for gear
 
crypticglobe's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: Nashville
Posts: 2,523

XP x64 is a WONDERFUL OS. However... you will find that in many cases it was never properly supported by many hardware/software manufacturers. I would recommend Vista x64. It's very solid since SP-1 and most of 2nd party drivers are really great now too.
crypticglobe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2009   #6
Gear maniac
 
Lemontree's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 276

XP64 but double check the driver support of your hardware. Saying that, most stuff with vista 64 drivers will run on XP64 even though it's not officialy supported.

Do your research and make sure someone has tested what you propose to do before you and all will be well.

I'm one of the first users of the Yamaha N12 on XP64 using the vista 64 drivers, 32 bit cubase and the yamaha/steinberg 32bit entensions. Result is rock solid system and 4GB of RAM where XP32 was showing 2.9GB thanks to my UAD cards.
__________________
Lemontree Studio
Lemontree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2009   #7
3 + infractions, forum membership suspended.
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,978

Arrow

Win XP sp2 32-BIT + Sonar 8 PE 32-Bit with 64-Bit engine active.
space2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2009   #8
Gear nut
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 104

Quote:
Originally Posted by crypticglobe View Post
XP x64 is a WONDERFUL OS..
I 100% agree with this....best O/S I have used
grandaddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2009   #9
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 833

Send a message via AIM to NesNeedsGear
depends what software you'll use. not every program is 64-bit compatible.

but even so...

I'm still on a Win XP 32-bit system using Nuendo 3, and it sounds great as ever.
__________________
"As long as the reason of man continues fallible, and he is at liberty to exercise it, different opinions will be formed." James Madison, 1751-1836
NesNeedsGear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th March 2009   #10
Gear interested
 
switch777's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Location: CT
Posts: 14

I've had problems running Sonar on XP x64. Not to mention the problems finding reliable drivers for all my other components. The performance different was negligible for me (AMD x64 dual core 4ghz, 4GB RAM).

I've found that for my standard tracking, I'm sticking with XP 32 because it just plain works all day long. I'm still able to get 60+ tracks, plugins, everything with no problems (I used multiple Layla 3G's).

When it comes time to mix down, I export the buses down to 8 tracks typically and then I actually load that stuff up on my Vista 64 build. I'm not super happy with Vista in general, but I do notice a performance enhancement when I start doing intensive post mix/pre master stuff. Bounces down to Powr 2 are much faster as well.
switch777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st December 2009   #11
Lives for gear
 
Quint's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,798

So now that we're about to be in 2010, how's XP 64 looking? I know a lot of you will say just to go with Windows 7 but I don't trust it yet and there's no way I'm ever using Vista. The reason that I'm asking is because I'm about to reinstall XP after repartitioning my hard drive and was considering going 64 instead of 32 bit. I currently run Sonar 7 and use an Echo Audiofire 12 on a home built, Q6600 processor computer with 2 gigs of ram. Anybody know of any issues with a setup like this and XP 64? I don't use a ton of plugins but would hate to lose the capability of the ones I do use if they're not 64 compatible. The extra ram and 64 bit capability with Sonar seem compelling but I don't want to paint myself into a corner, so to speak. Don't most plugins, even if not 64 bit compatible, still just reliably run at 32 in a situation like this (bit bridge or whatever it's called)?

Also, how hard is it to switch to 64 bit after the fact if I go ahead and just reinstall XP at 32 again, just as it was previously? Is it just as simple as going into BIOS and making a switch to 64?
__________________
We (AudioLot) accept VISA/MC, Paypal, Google Checkout, Bank Wire, Checks, and Cash. - Kittonian
Quint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st December 2009   #12
Lives for gear
 
Quint's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,798

Ah, it would appear that maybe there are some answers here:

Anyone Using XP-64 bit os ona DAW...

I still would like for somebody that knows a lot about this to chime in though.
Quint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st December 2009   #13
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,114

would not do XP 64
Win 7 is the way to go. as a system builder this is the first time we have sold a Windows OS at release.
normally its a yr down the road (first SP) before we do.
Vista 64 is also good at this point (only took 2+ yrs) but why when you can do win7 which is better.


Scott
ADK
jcschild is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st December 2009   #14
Lives for gear
 
Quint's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,798

Quote:
Originally Posted by jcschild View Post
would not do XP 64
Win 7 is the way to go. as a system builder this is the first time we have sold a Windows OS at release.
normally its a yr down the road (first SP) before we do.
Vista 64 is also good at this point (only took 2+ yrs) but why when you can do win7 which is better.


Scott
ADK
I'm really not interested in going to Windows 7 at the moment. It's still too new. It's either XP 64 or XP 32 for now. I'm just trying to decide which one. It would seem at this point that 32 might be the best bet given that a lot of plugins still won't support 64. I'd like to be told otherwise though, if I'm wrong about that. XP 64 sure does look attractive from a power standpoint.
Quint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st December 2009   #15
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,114

i am telling you otherwise.
software is not the concern it will be the same with any 64bit OS
of the available 64 OS windows 7 is by far the best option you will most likely need Jbridge regardless
the only thing that is a concern is hardware drivers for win 7.
XP 64 is an un-supported OS by most manufacturers and its the worst of the 64 bit OS.

Scott
ADK
jcschild is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st December 2009   #16
Gear addict
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 480

I have now switched back to XP32. The main reason for doing so was I was tired of printer hang-ups. I realized I didn't need 4GB of RAM and my projects work just fine with 3GB.

But XP64 worked just fine for me for recording purposes.
357mag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st December 2009   #17
Gear nut
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 93

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quint View Post
I'm really not interested in going to Windows 7 at the moment. It's still too new. It's either XP 64 or XP 32 for now. I'm just trying to decide which one. It would seem at this point that 32 might be the best bet given that a lot of plugins still won't support 64. I'd like to be told otherwise though, if I'm wrong about that. XP 64 sure does look attractive from a power standpoint.

I think you will find better driver support with windows 7 then XP.. For example my Motu MK3 UL runs better with the new windows 7 drivers in windows 7 then it did in windows xp sp3...Most companies are now developing for windows 7 and not Xp. Windows 7 is far from new from a testing standpoint..
jrwaltb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st December 2009   #18
Motown legend
 
Bob Olhsson's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Songwriter Gulch, Nashville TN
Posts: 10,878

The bleeding edge generally bleeds.

XP 32 has had by far the most bugs squashed and seems as fast or faster than anything newer. Virtual instruments are about the only reason I can think of that one might want a 64 bit system.
Bob Olhsson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st January 2010   #19
Gear addict
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: Northern Sky
Posts: 312

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Olhsson View Post
The bleeding edge generally bleeds.

XP 32 has had by far the most bugs squashed and seems as fast or faster than anything newer. Virtual instruments are about the only reason I can think of that one might want a 64 bit system.
+1

Agree, see no point of using a heavy system as Vista or Windows7.
Simma Lugnt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st January 2010   #20
Lives for gear
 
Quint's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,798

Quote:
Originally Posted by jcschild View Post
i am telling you otherwise.
software is not the concern it will be the same with any 64bit OS
of the available 64 OS windows 7 is by far the best option you will most likely need Jbridge regardless
the only thing that is a concern is hardware drivers for win 7.
XP 64 is an un-supported OS by most manufacturers and its the worst of the 64 bit OS.

Scott
ADK
Well I'm just not willing to go the Windows 7 route yet. I just don't trust it yet. XP is very stable and gives me no issues. The only decision I have to make right now is either XP 64 or XP 32. So that being said, I'm probably leaning towards going the 32 route again just because I know it works. Anybody else wanna weigh in on the pros and cons of XP 64 vs XP 32?
Quint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st January 2010   #21
Gear addict
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 480

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quint View Post
Well I'm just not willing to go the Windows 7 route yet. I just don't trust it yet. XP is very stable and gives me no issues. The only decision I have to make right now is either XP 64 or XP 32. So that being said, I'm probably leaning towards going the 32 route again just because I know it works. Anybody else wanna weigh in on the pros and cons of XP 64 vs XP 32?
I wouldn't jump on Windows 7 yet either. It's too new. XP is proven and stable. Your instincts are good.
357mag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2010   #22
Lives for gear
 
Quint's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,798

Quote:
Originally Posted by 357mag View Post
I wouldn't jump on Windows 7 yet either. It's too new. XP is proven and stable. Your instincts are good.
Yeah, I agree. There are going to be bugs that still remain to see the light with Windows 7 and I don't want them causing issues with my audio. I'm not gonna jump on 7 just because it's the latest greatest thing. Maybe in 2011.
Quint is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pro Tools on Windows 64-bit yet? Rukas Music computers 2 1st December 2008 06:22 PM
The right way to remove the last 8 bit (few bit) in 24 bit recording K8L-64 Mastering forum 7 18th June 2008 08:12 AM
windows XP 32 or 64 bit? kaiya Music computers 1 17th March 2008 02:20 AM
When recording @ 16 bit with 24 bit soundcards will the 16 bit recordings sound same? rokuez Music computers 4 12th March 2008 02:43 AM
Can a standard Version of windows xp pro (32 bit) run on a 64 bit machine heathen Music computers 8 19th March 2006 01:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:26 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.