Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Music computers

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
a plugin that tells you the pitch/tuning of a sound? ilovesound Electronic Music Instruments & Electronic Music Production 12 25th February 2008 01:53 AM
Apogee Duet + Beyerdynamic MC 930 best natural sound for $1500? nomraun So much gear, so little time! 8 11th December 2007 03:02 AM
Reffrence Albums for sound tuning! Lexicondonn High end 25 26th March 2006 11:52 AM
pearl, milab, ear: rectangular capsules and natural sound audiothings High end 3 20th April 2004 03:26 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 6th October 2008, 11:30 AM   #1
Beastie
Lives for gear
 
Beastie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 619
Send a message via Skype™ to Beastie
Question Tuning Software best for natural sound without plugin sound sheen....?

Hey Guys...

So the question is......

What is the best tuning software for workin with vocal groups and making things sound in tune in a natural way (not like TPAIN!).....

I have been using wavestune - which i have been feeling fine with while tuning. However when it comes to playing back what i have done - it feels as though there is a kinda sheen of the wavestune making the vocal sound duller....?

Is auto tune more favourable?

or is melodyne the place to go?

I use the graphical mode...

THANKS GUYS!

peace
__________________
Beastie...................
Beastie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th October 2008, 01:16 PM   #2
Karloff70
Lives for gear
 
Karloff70's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: london
Posts: 1,320
In the 'tuning tunnel' are we.....lol ?

Enjoy! And pop by for a beverage sometime when you're allowed away from the Mac......
__________________
Life is a compromise between what your ego wants you to do, what your experience will let you do and what your nerves will stop you from doing.
Karloff70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th October 2008, 01:47 PM   #3
hackenslash
Gear addict
 
hackenslash's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: People's Republic Of Mancunia
Posts: 400
For anyone looking for a tuning plug at the moment, only Melodyne should be recommended. If you buy the plug now you qualify for a free upgrade to Melodyne 2, which has the ability to correct individual notes in polyphonic recordings.

Watch the vid.

celemony_ :: News
__________________
The pen is mightier than the sword if the sword is very short, and the pen is very sharp. - Terry Pratchett
hackenslash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th October 2008, 02:28 PM   #4
Vank
Gear Head
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by hackenslash View Post
For anyone looking for a tuning plug at the moment, only Melodyne should be recommended. If you buy the plug now you qualify for a free upgrade to Melodyne 2, which has the ability to correct individual notes in polyphonic recordings.

Watch the vid.

celemony_ :: News
+1 Melodyne no doubt!
Vank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th October 2008, 02:44 PM   #5
jdjustice
Lives for gear
 
jdjustice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,261
I have AT Evo and Waves Tune and have used Melodyne (but am not fluent at it).

Waves Tune AND AT can 'dull' or 'augment' the sound a bit when you listen closely, but if you are going for 'natural'-sounding results, it is my humble opinion that Waves Tune sounds more natural still. You should try AT Evo and Melodyne too, but it is my understanding that all tuning plugs leave a bit of the sound of the plugin-- almost a 'sheen' of sorts -- behind.

Again I don't have a lot of experience with Melodyne and I do know that the learning curve for good results with it is steeper than for the others.
__________________
jdjustice.net
jdjustice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th October 2008, 03:17 PM   #6
psycho_monkey
Lives for gear
 
psycho_monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: London
Posts: 2,643
Melodyne dulls the sound noticeably for me - I can't use it on stacks of vocals, they end up sounding very deficient in high-mids. Doesn't seem to bother some people.

The new version of autotune is pretty good.

But mainly it's down to the skill of the operator - don't expect to be an expert overnight!
psycho_monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th October 2008, 10:22 PM   #7
A440
Gear addict
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: London
Posts: 469
Melodyne is the best I've used...but will still leave artifacts if not used with care...as always, minimum possible use is best.
A440 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th October 2008, 10:57 PM   #8
Beastie
Lives for gear
 
Beastie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 619
Send a message via Skype™ to Beastie
Smile Thanks Guys!

Thanks for your input..

We have waves tune and new autotune is on it its way and maybe well end up gettin melodyne as well....

I think well give autotune evo a go and if its not doin it to my liking, move back to waves tune!

and like you say its more than the plugin - its also down to the operator - and im forging my way through...

One again THANKS!

oh and Mr KARLOFF a beer sounds good!

Soon my man soon!

peace
__________________
Beastie...................
Beastie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th October 2008, 12:48 AM   #9
psycho_monkey
Lives for gear
 
psycho_monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: London
Posts: 2,643
Quote:
Originally Posted by A440 View Post
Melodyne is the best I've used...but will still leave artifacts if not used with care...as always, minimum possible use is best.
THe problem I've had with melodyne is that just scanning the audio in dulls it. Try it...scan in the audio, play back from the plugin and then toggle the bypass. I hear a significant change in timbre just from this. Yes, you could probably dial a bit of top end back in...but it's not ideal, esp when stacking vocals. autotune doesn't appear to affect any audio you're not altering.
psycho_monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th October 2008, 03:55 AM   #10
gainstages
Lives for gear
 
gainstages's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 585
i use autotune and waves both. i like the overall sound of waves a bit more and prefer it for graphical editing, but i like autotune when i need to throw something on and dial it in superfast in real time. both work extremely well with the right tweaking. again... i lean a bit towards the "sound" of waves overall. for stacked parts, try alternating between tune and autotune and that might help minimize the effect of dulling your vocal stack.

or, you could just get people to practice the part until they can actually sing it..
__________________
---------------------------------
Check out my blog
http://recordingpro.blogspot.com
gainstages is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th October 2008, 04:00 AM   #11
DannyMac
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 257
have you tried automating the bypass status of the tuning plug - only have it operate when things are out of tune ?
DannyMac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th October 2008, 08:26 AM   #12
Beastie
Lives for gear
 
Beastie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 619
Send a message via Skype™ to Beastie
Talking mmmm

Quote:
Originally Posted by gainstages View Post
or, you could just get people to practice the part until they can actually sing it..
Yeah i hear ya!

Only we dont have all year!
__________________
Beastie...................
Beastie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th October 2008, 08:31 AM   #13
Karloff70
Lives for gear
 
Karloff70's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: london
Posts: 1,320
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beastie View Post
Yeah i hear ya!

Only we dont have all year!
Better get faster at tuning than they are at learning singing then......
__________________
Life is a compromise between what your ego wants you to do, what your experience will let you do and what your nerves will stop you from doing.
Karloff70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th October 2008, 08:35 AM   #14
Beastie
Lives for gear
 
Beastie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 619
Send a message via Skype™ to Beastie
Unhappy thanks man

Quote:
Originally Posted by DannyMac View Post
have you tried automating the bypass status of the tuning plug - only have it operate when things are out of tune ?
It had crossed my mind....

what bout doin that then printing the part?

that sounds like a plan...

however sometime tune is necessary on the whole phrase or line!
__________________
Beastie...................
Beastie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th October 2008, 08:46 AM   #15
Jam
Lives for gear
 
Jam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: South East England
Posts: 835
Another Melodyne fan here. I agree with the earlier comments that it takes a while to master.

Sometimes I chop out the "pitchy" parts and then put 'em on a separate track. Then just tune that.

James
__________________
http://www.jamesmuir.org My personal site

http://www.makemorenoise.org Free Logic video tutorials
Jam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th October 2008, 08:46 AM   #16
Jake 2.0
Gear addict
 
Jake 2.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Jersey
Posts: 385
Send a message via AIM to Jake 2.0 Send a message via MSN to Jake 2.0 Send a message via Skype™ to Jake 2.0
melo-done (;
Jake 2.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th October 2008, 09:22 AM   #17
duckoff
Gear addict
 
duckoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 385
melodyne is great on most vocals, however it doesn't do so well on sibilants ( or any inharmonic stuff ) I often end up cutting all the original ( untuned ) esses back into the melodyned vocal to avoid robot esses.
duckoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th October 2008, 09:44 AM   #18
Karloff70
Lives for gear
 
Karloff70's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: london
Posts: 1,320
Hey beastboy, I can see you
__________________
Life is a compromise between what your ego wants you to do, what your experience will let you do and what your nerves will stop you from doing.
Karloff70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th October 2008, 09:57 AM   #19
Chris Doremus
Gear nut
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North Hollywood, CA
Posts: 79
The way I see it

Melodyn adds artifacts and is easiest to use.

An engineer I respect told me he hasn't had the problem. I'm thinking that my problem might be that I'm using the standalone not the rtas version.


Waves Tune seems the most transparent although will still add artifacts.

I've used it to really flatten pop vocals and its performed very well.

Auto-Tune is in the middle.

Could be considered to be easiest to use....it has an AUTO mode. But by far the clumsiest and biggest learning curve in graphical mode. But this plug-in sounds good when used correctly.
__________________
I'm really happy to be working with music as a living.
Chris Doremus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th October 2008, 10:03 AM   #20
macleodgrant
Lives for gear
 
macleodgrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dublin
Posts: 2,018
Quote:
Originally Posted by duckoff View Post
melodyne is great on most vocals, however it doesn't do so well on sibilants ( or any inharmonic stuff ) I often end up cutting all the original ( untuned ) esses back into the melodyned vocal to avoid robot esses.
yeah, the same with breaths.

what i do on a vox, i create a new track and copy all the parts i want to correct on that track and then use the different tools to see which gives the best results. i don't tune everything; those days are over
macleodgrant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th October 2008, 10:33 AM   #21
mathieujm
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: France - Toulouse
Posts: 29
Elastic Audio from Magix is a good one for voices, but... it's in Samplitude
Samplitude, Sequoia, Sam for Rent

JM
mathieujm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th October 2008, 10:48 AM   #22
Wally
Gear Head
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Springfield,MA
Posts: 74
just have a great performance make sure person does its job cuz theres no such a program that makes vocal sound with poor quality Melodyne and auto tune make audio loose quality try it ur self.
Wally is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th October 2008, 01:12 PM   #23
Beastie
Lives for gear
 
Beastie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 619
Send a message via Skype™ to Beastie
Talking New working method for now...

First timing...

Then overall tuning.... (subtle autotuning)

Then tuning graphically on detailed notes...(the bugger!)

BOSCH - JOB DONE!
__________________
Beastie...................
Beastie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th October 2008, 01:15 PM   #24
Karloff70
Lives for gear
 
Karloff70's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: london
Posts: 1,320
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beastie View Post
First timing...

Then overall tuning.... (subtle autotuning)

Then tuning graphically on detailed notes...(the bugger!)

BOSCH - JOB DONE!
Always first timing me ol china......
__________________
Life is a compromise between what your ego wants you to do, what your experience will let you do and what your nerves will stop you from doing.
Karloff70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th October 2008, 01:20 PM   #25
Beastie
Lives for gear
 
Beastie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 619
Send a message via Skype™ to Beastie
Sup.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karloff70 View Post
Always first timing me ol china......
me ol china?

what is that - one of you terms of endearment? ;)

yeah its after that it gets tricky... LOL!
__________________
Beastie...................
Beastie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th October 2008, 02:11 PM   #26
Karloff70
Lives for gear
 
Karloff70's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: london
Posts: 1,320
Not so much tricky, but a little subjective perhaps......sup?
Attached Thumbnails
tuning-software-best-natural-sound-without-plugin-sound-sheen-sup.jpg  
__________________
Life is a compromise between what your ego wants you to do, what your experience will let you do and what your nerves will stop you from doing.
Karloff70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0