![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear addict Joined: Apr 2005 Location: Seattle and Portland
Posts: 426
Thread Starter | 48K tracks in 44.1 PT session - what to do now?
Hi all, I mistakenly recorded a lot of tracks in a 44.1 session at 48k. Yeah, I know that was stupid - but I'm wondering if there is anyway to get all these files getting along at 44.1 so that I can bounce and have my bounces be at the proper speed. Ina few cases there are some actual 44.1 tracks but most of the sessions were all recorded with the converters set at 48 but the session at 44.1. I guess in the worst case scenario, I can send the stereo mix out to a DAT or something but that would really be a drag given that Ive got about 30 of these short little pieces and they will probably be getting tweaked a lot over time. Any help is much appreciated |
| | |
| | #2 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2004 Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 938
| Quote:
Go to http://www.railjonrogut.com/ and get the Header investigator program. Its free. Itll remap all of your 48k to 44.1 or vice versa.. I did the same thing a few weeks ago and this little program did the trick. -S0nguy | |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear addict Joined: Apr 2005 Location: Seattle and Portland
Posts: 426
Thread Starter |
Wow- thanks for that tip. Thats looks like exactly what I need. BUT - it looks like thats for PC, right? I need to find something for my Mac G4 that can handle SDII. Does anyone know of such a program? |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Why does PT default to 48k? | Simpleton | High end | 9 | 7th August 2006 12:36 AM |
| MIxing session for my tracks: hints/protocol/etc? | davetron5000 | So much gear, so little time! | 0 | 29th June 2006 07:21 PM |
| how much delay should you add to dry tracks.. with respect to wet tracks?? | activexjava | High end | 8 | 31st March 2006 05:53 AM |
| Analogue: Less Tracks + Bouncing Vs More Tracks Without | Mark | So much gear, so little time! | 2 | 26th August 2005 05:16 PM |
| |