![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 211
Thread Starter | Is there a sound difference in various DAW's ? Ive read, where some people say that if you load up the same tracks in different DAW's on the same PC, use the same hardware and monitors and press play, each will sound different. I find it hard to believe. Anyone ever do an actual test ? Its all digital. I can see where different hardware would effect the sound. But not software. Let me know if you know anything to back up such a claim. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 459
| I have used quite a few and I think the difference is not noticeable. The real difference is in the EQ's compressors etc. but many use 3rd party plug ins anyway so this is often a non issue. I don't believe that there is a difference in the audio quality pre say. there may be a difference but I doubt anyone could tell in a blind test. Its all 0's and 1's that we're created by your audio interface. the only other area would be in how they bus signals together. In the output there might be a noticeable difference, but which one is better would be a matter of opinion.
__________________ Gear FreQ |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 391
| omfg it will never end ever utfsf -- this bullshit has been beat to death for eons stop the madness now. trolls stay at least 60 feet back Danger Will Robinson! ![]() |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,338
| Quote:
Is Digital Performer Audio and/or Summing Broken? My first post is #140 | |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 182
| Every programer writes code a little different, every compiler generate code slightly different so technically yes there is a difference. For a basic track is it a difference you can hear I would say no. Maybe someone with extraordinary great ears might but most no. Now you get past basic tracks into EQ, and effects and such then they all have their own formulas and algorithms they use and that is audible. That is why there is such a big market of plug-ins and such.
__________________ Steve B. The Dojo of Cool ![]() ---------------------------------------- All that we are is the result of what we have thought. - Buddha |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Canuk
Posts: 5,161
| Lynn Fuston put out a DAW CD a while back |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,345
| I would assume the differences are redundant. (this is assuming without the usage of the plug-ins that came with the DAW application). People say Reason and Orion have a sound of their own though - haven't tried it myself. If there would be audiable differences, I would suggest they would come out the most with large track counts and plenty of conversion and/or editing and plugs. A few canadians guys, calls themselves "infinate wave", did some pretty serious testing of this on a purely techical level. They published their results online - and even made a snazzy interface to look at it through. The test was based purely on software performance, and targeted downsampling a 96 khz rising sine tone to 44,1 khz within many hosts - noting aliasing problems and other things. I'm not sure how valid it is or how one might interpret it to the best way. For example, it seems Logic 8 got a worse result from being run on osx Tiger than osx Leopard. Assuming things like that is a true representation of the SRC of different hosts, it was a bit of an eyeopener to me. (especially since I'm on Steinberg software and it got pretty low score - bastards) SRC Comparisons
__________________ "Listen through the equipment, not to the equipment" - Bill Putnam |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2008 Location: Memphis
Posts: 632
| no. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Earth
Posts: 338
| ![]() |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 211
Thread Starter | Thanks to those who replied. And to those few who slammed me for not researching. I did research and thats why I asked. Some say yes, some say no. I wanted to know anyone knew of a professional test done. Thanks again |
| | |
| | #11 |
| 3 + infractions, forum membership suspended. Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Rosedale Cemetery Singing Beach, MA
Posts: 4,873
| those test cd's ARE WORTHLESS. they run the same track through the DAW. Sorry that NULL test..........itself should be NULLED. If you have 5 daws and you record 1 song 5 DIFFERENT TIMES..... ONCE AGAIN RECORD the SAME song 5 Different times there will be a difference. Not including the nuances in playing ofcourse I've done tests and there is a difference. Subtle but a difference. My theory is it has to do with the soundcard device drivers and how each daw interacts with the driver. Also I thin kthe way DAW's impelement plugins could be an issue. Again the NULL test DOES NOT WORK it is not a true test. It is irrelevant....... Sure the internal processing of a pcm file should not vary. But with dithering and other variables it is a fact that rounding and truncation errors/differences will occur Also CPU's may be a problem. Even a CPU has the potential not to process data the same way twice. Even a greater chance 2 cpus/computers. Will have minute differences. I know I know you think that is not possible BUT IT IS. I had a 1+ hour conversation today with a Metrology/process guy at my work on how this can happen. With CPU's and software it all comes down to the amount acceptable errors. Every CPU that comes of the line has errors. however miniscule they may be, there still are errors Im not implying the differences are big or even matter but there is a difference. The difference may be during realtime playback or during recording. Maybe there is no difference during bounce/flattening but there are so many variables. Think about it....... How many times has your DAW crashed? I know I know, if you are on a MAC it's never happend (ya right) but let's think about this. How many time has your DAW crashed? Why did it crash? because there is a bug or many bugs? So if it is possible for a daw to crash due to bugs then why wouldn't be possible for one of these bugs to cause a problem with the 'sound' of the DAW? Or the way it process the pcm data. |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: near Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 485
| Allen the null tests do work. And you have to (you must) use the same audio files otherwise, like you mention, you bring in other variables such as soundcards etc. So yes, the null tests are accurate for using the exact same audio files, and in fact that is the only proper way to test it. Allen, in the tests where you heard differences, were they done as A/B tests or A/B/X? Because it is very easy to fool oneself into hearing differences where there are none with A/B tests. Throw in an X and see if you still hear the differences? If you can pass an A/B/X test with 100% then you can safely say you are hearing differences, otherwise A/B can be deceiving especially between identical audio files. cheers.
__________________ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2007 Location: UK
Posts: 9,394
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Gear Head Join Date: May 2008 Location: San Diego
Posts: 65
| can you tell the difference between something that was mixed in pro tools vs cubase vs logic vs anything else? can anyone? in a blind test? just find the platform/environment that you like best and trust that the digital summing (or whatever you want to call it) is fine. |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Gear addict Join Date: May 2007 Location: People's Republic Of Mancunia
Posts: 403
| Quote:
There is no difference.
__________________ The pen is mightier than the sword if the sword is very short, and the pen is very sharp. - Terry Pratchett | |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 391
| Yes, some say there is a difference but what you will notice is that not one of them can ever offer the slightest shred of evidence to support their claim. Period. |
| | |
| | #17 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Spring Hill, TN, USA
Posts: 2,237
| This entire post I've quoted here is hogwash. Pure unadulterated hogwash. Sorry to be so blunt, but the truth hurts sometimes. To prove it, we ran different versions of PT on five different computers running an assortment of OS's and received bit identical results. That means that out of hundreds of millions of values, not a single bit was different. Different computers=different results? Grab a bunch of computers and run some calculations on them and see how much numerical difference there is in the answers. We all know that different banks using different computers come up with different bank account balances daily. I use the bank with the computers that round up. Read this entire post again and believe the opposite is true of everything it says. Quote:
__________________ Lynn Fuston 3D Audio Inc. Host of 3dB, Producer of the 3D Vocal Mic, Preamp, ADC, Ribbon Mic Comparison CDs available at 3D Webstore. | |
| | |
| | #18 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Spring Hill, TN, USA
Posts: 2,237
| Quote:
We didn't determine what causes the differences that we observed between some, but we did find that most sum identically. The others which wouldn't were broken. If anyone is unfamiliar with the tests that TRS and Allen referenced above, there's a great deal of discussion here: Awesome DAW-SUM Comparison - 3dB And the files are available here if you want to do your own listening. Awesome DAWSUM Samples - 3dB NOTE: The files are not available for free. If you don't want to hear them, you don't have to pay for them. | |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,391
| |
| | |
| | #20 | |
| 3 + infractions, forum membership suspended. Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Rosedale Cemetery Singing Beach, MA
Posts: 4,873
| Quote:
Do you have any idea what is the required floating point precision when calculating money? Or should I say what precision is NOT required. Bad example. | |
| | |
| | #21 | |
| Gear Head Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 36
| Quote:
Get over yourself. Apart from DAW software that is broken ( i.e Cubase VST which is years old anyway ) they all sound the same. Lynn Fuston has put more effort into this than anyone. And in the early days when many of us were unsure we also spent hours testing it. They sound the same. Go and make some music ![]() | |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Lives for gear | hmmm.... ever heard of samplitude ...... I kid. |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: europe austria
Posts: 1,612
| why do i think that they sound different? cause they´re different to work with and routing/mixing is sometimes very different. therefore the result has to sound different. comps, reverbs, eqs don´t act exactly the same in different routing-ways. when recording one channel, you can´t notice a difference. when you playback one channel without editing/routing, you can´t notice a difference.
__________________ ![]() ![]() 1 x Lynx Aurora 16 1950,- 1 x AUDIX DP5aX EUR 649,- 1 x Apogee AD16X incl. X-HD EUR 1600,- 1 x SSL 4000 SL615E PREAMP RACK, 24 Channels 4000,- |
| | |
| | #24 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2007 Location: UK
Posts: 9,394
| Quote:
I'll give you a clue (and you'll have to do some research here !hah!) - the Virtuosi project in the 90's. | |
| | |
| | #25 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Spring Hill, TN, USA
Posts: 2,237
| |
| | |
| | #26 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Spring Hill, TN, USA
Posts: 2,237
| Quote:
Let me be very specific though. I'm not saying all DAWs sound alike. All my testing proved was that summing ONLY, when done correctly, is the same on all the DAWs (that weren't broken) tested. Throw plugins into the mix and all bets are off. | |
| | |
| | #27 | |
| 3 + infractions, forum membership suspended. Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Rosedale Cemetery Singing Beach, MA
Posts: 4,873
| Quote:
All I can say is incident angle is a killer when rounding. Deposition and beam strike will always make you wonder how these cpu devices can even work. Despite what you think you know. The Manufacturing of cpu's still has a little bit of luck involved. This is the difference, it's not all science as you would think. There is still some finessing involved. In the industry it is known as 'tuning'. Same with software there is always some tweaking involved. A compromise if you will. A comprimise that can leave you with errors and flaws. When you write code you assume in good faith that the linker and source to source translator have no bugs and are 100% error free. When you buy an operating system you expect the same level of consistency. We know this isn't the case. MS and Apple put out 'hot' fixes and sp's EVERYDAY. The Intel compiler I use everday was written in 2006. But yet I'm developing source for Vista and XP both came out after 06 Tell me there can't be errors? Open your eyes man take a computer class or something. From a guy that compares the required floating point presicion of the banking industry to IEEE floating point precision required by a DAW, is suspect. | |
| | |
| | #28 |
| Lives for gear | Maybe you need to take a class in computers Allen, seriously there is no need to be so aggressive on this, the fact of the matter is that floating point precision is handled by the processors FPU, it's not something that is down to the application, every app on that one machine will get the same results for single or double precision floating point operations (barring interference from neutrinos, electric spikes etc), for single we're well outside of the range of human hearing before we get anywhere near the limit and they all use single precision floating point operations currently. The result is the same, the same data is sent to the ports and retrieved from the ports, the parsing of the data is handled in a static and standardized way (there's only so many ways you can do this stuff), coding style has zero impact there unless your coding style includes wrong. Summing itself is a basic thing, a literal addition. Even Pan laws are fairly basic and thus should be the same across multiple DAWS, but any plugin any EQ anything else involved that convolutes the sound will sound different. However if it's the same plugin used on both daws the results should be the same, it would be interesting to test that and make sure this is the case. |
| | |
| | #29 | ||||||
| 3 + infractions, forum membership suspended. Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Rosedale Cemetery Singing Beach, MA
Posts: 4,873
| Quote:
okeedokee? Quote:
are a godsend. An is if the 8 that mmx gave wasn't enough. mov( 1, eax ); movd( reg32, mmi ); huh? what? fpu? punpcklbw? psubusw? pmulhuw? Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
a daw? Please explain to me just how you know this. Steinberg just gave the source code I guess. Now anyone could implement vst............. Do you subscribe to pc world? just curious | ||||||
| | |
| | #30 | ||
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2007 Location: UK
Posts: 9,394
| Quote:
Quote:
| ||
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Difference in sound between LM-1 and LinnDrum? | Alex.T | Electronic Music Instruments & Electronic Music Production | 62 | 26th December 2010 04:25 PM |
| Difference in sound of PT playback vs sound of PT input | Lawson | Music computers | 3 | 20th September 2008 05:53 PM |
| How can you describe DAW's sound? | IzzyRock | So much gear, so little time! | 292 | 2nd July 2008 05:19 PM |
| Different DAW's different sound? | gsilbers | Music computers | 17 | 28th May 2006 07:52 PM |
| Can computer hardware effect your DAW's sound? | Keyplayer | So much gear, so little time! | 19 | 17th August 2004 05:54 AM |
| |