Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Music computers

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NEED iTUNES help! Herman Munster Music computers 1 22nd March 2008 10:46 PM
Help - Anyone know iTunes? henryrobinett Music computers 4 1st January 2008 06:33 PM
The CD that never comes off of iTunes....? illynoise Downloads, the future - Q&A forum with expert guests from CD Baby, Tunecore and Nimbit 3 22nd November 2007 04:41 AM
itunes 4.5 BevvyB So much gear, so little time! 17 27th September 2005 05:10 PM
iTunes smoothmoniker So much gear, so little time! 14 23rd October 2003 04:17 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 4th September 2008, 06:03 PM   #31
bjm007
Gear nut
 
bjm007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Way out west...
Posts: 115
Quote:
Originally Posted by nd33 View Post
You find it difficult creating a playlist in iTunes?
What specific difficulties are you having with playlists?

Itunes is pretty simple and intuitive for me, Apple are well known for those qualities.
Lossless encoding is a good way to go with iTunes, uses around half the filespace and have been proven to be completely cancel out with the original wave file (hence the lossless ).

_
No playlists are the only thing it can do reassonably well, it's the file management that the thread starter mentioned that it can't do worth a sh#t...

I can go back and forth between the apple os and windows pretty easily, but itunes file management (or lack thereof) is so much a non-starter for me, it borders on the absurd.

Doa google search for anapod and you will see a product that actually is "helpful" to use for this purpose, and I have no affiliation with the company, they just build a good product.
__________________
Don't you know that it's a fool that plays it cool...
bjm007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2008, 06:10 PM   #32
travisbrown
Lives for gear
 
travisbrown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,729
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Derrick View Post
"Take it easy"? I wasn't riled up...did it sound like I was?
Sorry Mike, it sounded to me as if you were frustrated by my answer, being dismissive, and reducing it to a semantic issue. I wasn't trying to pick on you. We used to be in a band together. I have good feelings towards you.

Anyways, Wiki, Apple, etc. are just being loose with their definition of media player. It's a misnomer at best. I guess you could call it a media player by proxy. If you pull iTunes apart, there's no native player in there. If one were picky, they wouldn't simply call a jukebox a CD or 45 player; fundamentally jukeboxes are robotic music librarians that retrieve and drop selected media from a catalogue into a playback device. You can't play something in a jukebox without adding it to the library. Sort of what iTunes does with QT.

The reason why I'm being precise about it is that using iTunes for ad hoc playback is like a graphic designer using Extensis Portfolio to quickly preview an image or an audio engineer using loop library software to preview a clip without indexing the media. They are just not the right tools for the job since they are indexing applications. So you asked the question, "is it possible" and I gave you the reason why it isn't. You can't because of the specific and intended function of the application.

Cheers.
__________________
I'm not a producer, but I play one on Gearslutz.com
travisbrown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2008, 06:14 PM   #33
filin
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 227
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freq18Hz View Post
the function the thread OP is asking for, would require a complete re-tooling of how average end users manage their content.

I was actually trying to help, and as far as I can tell, provided the most useful information here in regards to workflow, auditioning files.

-Freq

Firstly, In what way is suggesting that the OP purchases a whole new computer the most useful information here? And secondly, complete retooling you say? A simple checkbox (that was present in earlier versions of iTunes) would affect users THAT much?
filin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2008, 06:20 PM   #34
OldTimey
Gear nut
 
OldTimey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 131
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freq18Hz View Post
FYI I've been building PCs about 10 longer than you have, so you aren't really convincing me about your expertise.
i love gearslutz! whip out the D!cks, get the measuring tape!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freq18Hz View Post
This entire thread should be deleted, given the lack of useful info, and boring dry "humor" and middle aged banter.
I actually agree with your on that one.

to the OP: "No" is your answer.
OldTimey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2008, 06:45 PM   #35
Blast9
Lives for gear
 
Blast9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: London
Posts: 2,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by nd33 View Post
Not exactly what you're looking for, but this may help some people:

While in a playlist in iTunes, selecting songs and holding down the Option key then hitting delete will not only erase the track from the playlist but also from the iTunes library completely.

So if you wanted to drag your temp files to a playlist, you can easily delete them from the library by selecting and deleting them from within the playlist using this method, without having to locate the files amongst your entire library.

This is on a Mac, I'm not sure what the equivalent key is on Windows.





_
DING DING! Thanks mate - this is what you need to know Mike (going back to my earlier post I think this will work for what you want)

Pretty positive there is an equivalent to the option key!
__________________
::
my band is called protoangel

My guitars: Atkin OM (sitka spruce top walnut back: sweet mids):: Atkin Small Jumbo (cedar top, rosewood back: big bottom, sparkly top):: Jap Tele with fat frets (rude and fat)::
.
My amps: 1973 Hiwatt DR504::Framus Dragon
...
Latest purchases Kel Audio HM-2d TC Electronic Nova System, Chameleon Labs 7602 Digi 002 + PTLE, Addictive Drums
Blast9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2008, 07:09 PM   #36
theblue1
Lives for gear
 
theblue1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 5,705
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freq18Hz View Post
It doesn't make me feel superior, but it does make me think you are willing to settle.

FYI I've been building PCs about 10 longer than you have, so you aren't really convincing me about your expertise.

I say that windows sucks, because I have been using it every single day since it was released. I've built many a PC daw, still have several, and unless you are an idiot, they are vastly inferior to running on a mac, mostly due to windows. They are however perceived to be cheaper, and people find pirated plugins easily for them.

This entire thread should be deleted, given the lack of useful info, and boring dry "humor" and middle aged banter.

The fact is, iTunes is the most widely distributed audio software in the world, and the function the thread OP is asking for, would require a complete re-tooling of how average end users manage their content.

Again the feature you are looking for, should be handled by the operating system. Mac OS has the Quicklook feature. Windows does not have anything similar, despite what you may think.


If you elect to suffer through windows, I could care less. I was actually trying to help, and as far as I can tell, provided the most useful information here in regards to workflow, auditioning files.

If WMP is working for you, why even bother touching iTunes?



-Freq
Don't know if you're addressing me, or not. Seems like you are. Just because I put together my first hard-disk based DAW system in '97 (when was your first DAW, again?) doesn't mean that was the first time I used a computer.

I've been using computers on a daily basis since 1985. I used a Windows machine to synch MIDI with my 16 channel ADAT studio long before going to hard-drive recording in '97. (I will stipulate, however, that before the MIDI and audio layers were in place in Win 95, Windows 3.x was a pretty clunky system for music, no question.)

Me, I don't think there's a single platform (or DAW, for that matter) that's right for everyone. I do use Macs in other work (though I don't own one) and I think there's much to like with that OS. That said, I don't find myself drawn to it or overly wowed by it.



Now, if you were addressing your comments to me, I'm afraid you must be confusing me with someone else if you think I'm a fan of or use WMP. It's certainly gotten better over the years but it's pretty much everything I don't like in a media player. Hell, if I could get Quicktime to stop putting its insipid and unnecessary 'quickloader' in my boot profile (please, Steve! I'm sick of removing that every time I turn around), I'd be quick say I like QT free better than WMP.


In my first post I offered the OP a number of options to do what he wanted to do, including VLC, MPC, and even QT, as well as acknowledging WinAmp (which is my light media player of choice).

With regard to quick previews of media, if I right click on a media file on my system, I have a choice of a number of players I can play it with. I can add it to the play queue of my main player, I can open it in something super fast loading like VLC or MPC, I can open it in my audio editor or my video editor, depending on file type. That's rt-click and pick an option. And, of course, I can set up any player as the default for a given file type.


You know, it's fine that you feel so smug and superior to some of the rest of us -- but it's not exactly endearing and it certainly doesn't do anything to convince this two-decade-plus computer user that he's wasting his time on the OS of his choice. I've run into plenty of guys like you before over the years... if using a Mac doesn't convince a guy like me, I sincerely doubt being berated by someone like you, will...
__________________
biz | profile | songblog | acoustic | mutant roots pop
theblue1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2008, 08:46 PM   #37
travisbrown
Lives for gear
 
travisbrown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,729
Quote:
Originally Posted by theblue1 View Post
(I will stipulate, however, that before the MIDI and audio layers were in place in Win 95, Windows 3.x was a pretty clunky system for music, no question.)
Isn't that why we all used Amigas at the time?

Y'know, just to take this thread off in an even greater tangent.
__________________
I'm not a producer, but I play one on Gearslutz.com
travisbrown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2008, 09:16 PM   #38
Blast9
Lives for gear
 
Blast9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: London
Posts: 2,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blast9 View Post
DING DING! Thanks mate - this is what you need to know Mike (going back to my earlier post I think this will work for what you want)

Pretty positive there is an equivalent to the option key!
- I mean in Windows version

Shit! This can't be - can't find any reference to this in shortcuts other than this one:

Control-R Show where a song file is located
__________________
::
my band is called protoangel

My guitars: Atkin OM (sitka spruce top walnut back: sweet mids):: Atkin Small Jumbo (cedar top, rosewood back: big bottom, sparkly top):: Jap Tele with fat frets (rude and fat)::
.
My amps: 1973 Hiwatt DR504::Framus Dragon
...
Latest purchases Kel Audio HM-2d TC Electronic Nova System, Chameleon Labs 7602 Digi 002 + PTLE, Addictive Drums
Blast9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th September 2008, 12:54 AM   #39
theblue1
Lives for gear
 
theblue1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 5,705
Quote:
Originally Posted by travisbrown View Post
Isn't that why we all used Amigas at the time?

Y'know, just to take this thread off in an even greater tangent.
Yeah... The Amigas and the Atari 1040ST (IIRC) -- those looked like rockin' machines. If I also recall correctly, I think one or both of them had true multi-threaded, multitasking OSs and some very good features.

At the time, I never dreamed it would be possible to do serious music work on a PC...

Ten or 12 years later, around the turn of the century, I decided to do a thorough review of where I was, because some of my old Mac pals had given me so much static about my "overgrown adding machine" -- but what I found was that while my OS already had a dedicated multichannel audio and MIDI layer and a developed plug-in API -- which, of course, had made my first 8 ch DAW possible back in '97, whereas pre-OS X, the Mac had had to depend on third party, proprietary systems just for MIDI, not to mention multi-channel audio. I found that I had MIDI latency of about 3 ms but that the best a pre-OS X Mac could do was about 8-9 ms MIDI latency. And all that... all history, now, of course. OS X 10.2 began the process of integrating the audio and MIDI layers and plug in API we know as Core Audio, which was pretty much complete by 10.4, IIRC, and the Mac has turned into an extremely capable audio platform.
__________________
biz | profile | songblog | acoustic | mutant roots pop
theblue1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2008, 01:51 AM   #40
synthoid
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Beijing, China
Posts: 728
Anyone else noticed that the Preview feature built into the finder in OS X 10.5.5 lets you play any kind of audio file from Finder, without launching an app? I love it! Goodbye iTunes for everything except managing an iPod. And goodbye Quicktime.

This feature probably appeared even earlier than 10.5.5, just took me a while to notice it.

-synthoid
synthoid is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2008, 02:04 AM   #41
taturana
Lives for gear
 
taturana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,493
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freq18Hz View Post

If WMP is working for you, why even bother touching iTunes?


-Freq

that's exactly why i unistalled Itunes on my PC..

no use for it.
taturana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2008, 07:37 PM   #42
travisbrown
Lives for gear
 
travisbrown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,729
Quote:
Originally Posted by synthoid View Post
Anyone else noticed that the Preview feature built into the finder in OS X 10.5.5 lets you play any kind of audio file from Finder, without launching an app? I love it! Goodbye iTunes for everything except managing an iPod. And goodbye Quicktime.

This feature probably appeared even earlier than 10.5.5, just took me a while to notice it.

-synthoid
See post 19 & 23.

Don't be so quick to discard iTunes/Quicktime. Quicklook only plays/displays files when you have the file highlighted. You couldn't use it to play a file while working on something else. It's a very useful thing, esp. for quickly scanning and previewing through lots of loops or clips with simply the arrow keys.
__________________
I'm not a producer, but I play one on Gearslutz.com
travisbrown is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0