![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: New York
Posts: 1,131
Thread Starter | Convolution reverb, how good is it? Well, how do the impulse waves of the Lexicon (or TC Elec 6000) compare to the real thing? I know with software such as Waves IR-1, it gives you a lot more control of the reverb compared to some of the lower cost plug ins. This of course maeks the impules a lot more flexible in your studio. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: St-Roch de l'Achigan Qc
Posts: 29
| Seen that quesiton on PSW forum, copy/paste... ![]() |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Gear Head Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 38
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear | There are other threads in this forum about this that you might want to search to find your answers. To sum up my thoughts on them, They can be great, however, none of the current convolution verbs can replicate any modulation, so there are many many artificial reverbs that cannot be sampled, Any Ursa Major, Lexicon, Ensoniq, for example. I prefer to use them to replicate real spaces rather than artificial reverbs. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Germany / Frankfurt
Posts: 1,209
| Just get a SIR. It's free. http://www.knufinke.de/sir/index_en.html There are also many free responses (of real spaces and gear) on the net. So give it a try. There are good and bad ones. I have had some stunning results with some of them. |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2002 Location: Ans (Liege) Belgium
Posts: 3,277
| Re: Convolution reverb, how good is it? Quote:
Must be me ![]()
__________________ Chris Lambrechts | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear | Today I downloaded the PT TDM TL Space and I have to say I was extremely impressed. I will put it through it's paces for the next week, but so far i'm pleased.
__________________ www.carvelstudios.com "I like my women the way I like my scotch, 20 years old and mix up in coke." |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: New York
Posts: 1,131
Thread Starter | Re: Re: Convolution reverb, how good is it? Quote:
Anyway, back to the topic. I think you hit on a very good point. Just because you have a impulse of a Lex or anything else, it does not mean that you will have a great sounding reverb. I do believe a lot of the sampling was done quick such as using the balloon method. When I saw what Waves did to get their own impulses (which you can't get by the way unless you have a Waves IR-1) http://www.acoustics.net/ I know that they did it right, taking samples at 96 and having a very complex way of doing things to get acurate impulses. I am sure most of the freebies on line were not done the same way. You pay for what you get is true. "After working with the IR-1 and the full set of impulse responses I'm thoroughly impressed with the tonality, richness, and sense of depth and ability to manipulate the parameters, particularly in separating the early reflections from the tail. It's a true breakthrough in reverb technology, providing sound quality that used to cost from 10 to 20 times as much!" Bob Katz, President and Mastering Engineer, Digital Domain, Orlando, FL | |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Convolution reverb | Soulbrother | So much gear, so little time! | 4 | 13th September 2006 02:44 PM |
| Convolution Reverb!!!! Which One? | Kenny Gioia | So much gear, so little time! | 72 | 16th July 2006 12:26 AM |
| What makes a convolution reverb the best? | Revelation | Music computers | 6 | 3rd June 2005 04:13 AM |
| yet another convolution 5.1 reverb | Nutmeg II. | So much gear, so little time! | 1 | 9th September 2004 03:49 AM |
| New Waves Convolution Reverb | tobymusic | So much gear, so little time! | 44 | 23rd January 2004 01:57 AM |
| |