![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2002 Location: Hollywood
Posts: 3,632
Thread Starter | ProTools 6.7/ RTAS on Aux Sends
With the release of PT 6.7 including support for RTAS plug ins on Auxes, is it still AS necessary to purchase TDM versions of ALL plug ins for us TDM users? Would this imply that plug in developers who provide TDM capable products will have to create a new price, since most people would inevitably choose to save a few bucks and just purchase the RTAS versions anyway. Obviously, there is still a need for DSP and I don't see this as an obliteration of TDM systems, but I can see this as being a possible alternative to the HTDM prices, i.e Altiverb HTDM. Waves would be another company to which this could be a bit detrimental as they tend to double the price for the TDM versions. AutoTune also, comes to mind. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2002 Location: Hollywood
Posts: 3,632
Thread Starter |
Anyone else care to comment or is this just a product of my over-active imagination?
|
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear addict Joined: Mar 2003 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 349
|
For technical reasons, as described in: this document RTAS plug-ins don't work on record armed audio tracks and must preced TDM plug-ins. RTAS plug-in can only be used on Aux tracks after an RTAS instrument.. an Aux track can't be set to an input and then feed an RTAS plug-in.. this is a technical limitation, not a design choice. Given all these limitations, it's still better to use TDM plug-ins which also report the correct ADC values to Pro Tools. Rail
__________________ Recording Engineer |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2002 Location: Hollywood
Posts: 3,632
Thread Starter | Quote:
Didn't realize this limitation was the same as with audio tracks under the new revision, although it does make sense. But, this still doesn't answer the question, even though, it's really just a topic for discussion. I appreciate the insight, though. The question was presented with regards to economics and pragmatism. | |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| logic- mono aux sends? | vtone | Music computers | 3 | 11th September 2006 07:51 PM |
| Stereo aux sends in Cubase SX? | Natural Mystic | Music computers | 18 | 24th August 2006 07:00 PM |
| Proposition for Paul Wolff, Tonelux: 16x4 Aux sends in 1U Rack | jindrich | High end | 33 | 26th May 2006 06:07 PM |
| How many aux sends? | Beneficial | So much gear, so little time! | 8 | 25th March 2005 12:32 AM |
| schematics for aux sends? | Coldsnow | So much gear, so little time! | 4 | 18th February 2003 05:19 PM |
| |