Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Music computers


New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 25th October 2004   #1
Gear interested
 
veejay_j's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12

Thread Starter
de-essing

What about a de-esser ?? I'm editing the "S" and "T's" now by hand, but is there a good and fast solution ?? Because the plugin's like waves/spitfish/spl etc. don't work for me ? And I'm also not really happy with the Focusrite de-esser in my channelstrip.

How are you dealing with the "S"

J.
veejay_j is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th October 2004   #2
Gear nut
 
Darth Fader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 144

Exclamation Try some chewing gum.

If esses are such a big problem for you, your problem is probably the vocalist's anatomy or your recording chain.

If he/she has a visible gap between his/her front teeth, that might be the cause of harsh S-ses. Try filling the gap with some chewing gum - sounds funny but works great.

Like this:

OTOH I'm quite happy with the Voxbox deesser, although I don't use it very often - better try to get the right sound with the right microphone (position).

What's your recording chain (mic?)
Darth Fader is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th October 2004   #3
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,230

how exactly does the deesser cause a problem?
do you have strong EQ settings, before or after ?
what are you doing in a different way, to the sibilants?
__________________
sorry 4 poor english
NeoVXR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th October 2004   #4
Moderator
 
toolskid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: london
Posts: 2,731

Send a message via Skype™ to toolskid
I generally do most of my deessing by hand (cut and paste the automation if you're feeling really lazy), but you should be able to get really good results with the waves ren-deesser! Try multiple de-essers with different shapes and frequencies if you've got a really problematic vocal
toolskid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th October 2004   #5
Lives for gear
 
Renie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 1,777

Tools

Why do you generally use volume automation rather than the waves plug-in?

cheers

R
Renie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th October 2004   #6
Moderator
 
toolskid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: london
Posts: 2,731

Send a message via Skype™ to toolskid
the you don't get any artifacts of compression, can sound much more natural to my (bashed and abused) ears!

Also the control is finer and not frequency specific! YMMV but it seems to work for me!

I usually do the final tweaks post brightening eq-pre compression...
toolskid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th October 2004   #7
Lives for gear
 
Renie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 1,777

i usually do a bit of both, using the digi de-esser, which you have to be very careful with.. ..after comp/eq

a lot of people rate the waves ren one hmm

thanks,
I'll investigate further.

Rene
Renie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th October 2004   #8
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Posts: 281

Send a message via Yahoo to Boby Stoica
sss

Rennaisance Deesser here, used in SX2, aplied (process plugin menu) only on the "S"es, cuting them and crossfadeing them. U can cut all of them with the "scisssor" tool and then "select all", and crossfade everything. Select only the "S" portions of the wave (shift+mouseclick) and then aply the plugin, with a shortcut that U define on ":key commands" menu. That works 4 me, and U need SX. Pretty fast - like 10 minutes for a song with voxes and backing - U can use a generic preset for your studio or for every artist.
Boby Stoica is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th October 2004   #9
Lives for gear
 
JonCraig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,800

Quote:
Originally posted by Renie
Tools

Why do you generally use volume automation rather than the waves plug-in?

cheers

R
compressor="automatic turner downer"

de-esser= compressor who's sidechain has the vox (or whatever) running through an EQ first, with the sibilant frequencies hyped (go to town... it's only feeding the sidechain, not the audio path)

since all a compressor does is turn stuff down, there's no reason you couldn't do this with automation. it's not too practical for, say, guitars (it's just easier to let a plugin to the work than to sit with the pencil tool for a day). but for selective volume moves, automation makes perfect sense to me.
__________________
"My job is to make music sound great and to not whine too much." --George Massenburg

Learn PT Techniques from Multi-Platinum Engineers. Click Here.
JonCraig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th October 2004   #10
Gear interested
 
veejay_j's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12

Thread Starter
thanks, guys for the advice... !

If I use a de-esser I hear that I remove some high of the vocalsound, this is with most plugin de-essers I used. And then I am using it not really heard.

When I do it by hand I found out that I got a much more sweet and natural sound. So I was curious to so how everybody is doing this..

And yes I got some problem vocalist, with space between the teeth and also someone with a jazzy low vocal sound with not much high in it so I really want to keep the high area so good/clean as possible.. ;-)

thanks..

J
veejay_j is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th October 2004   #11
Lives for gear
 
mac black's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: london
Posts: 2,787

I use a touch of waves de-esser and the rest with volum rides in logic.

sounds great.

mac
__________________
"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil" ...
- Thomas Mann
mac black is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th October 2004   #12
Lives for gear
 
Alécio Costa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Brazil, Florianópolis/SC
Posts: 1,705

hi

I use a combination of Waves De-esser and some additional carving with Waves Q6.

Another tip: ask the singer if he touches the back of his teeth too much. There lives the source of the excessive S´s.
Also: ask him to slightly get the mouth off mics axis when he reaches some critical passenges with too much S.
Sometimes a touch of S is also fine to cut thru a jammed mix.
Alécio Costa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st October 2004   #13
Lives for gear
 
s.d.finley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,561

First I will switch mics on an unusally silibant vocalist, and if thats not enuff, use a touch of desser from the Focusrite channel strip.

When mixing, if there are stacks of the vocals, find the most annoying of the "SSSSS" and fade them or use the automation, or the ol' hand(!). But dont do this across all the tracks. Leave the least offensive ones untoched for that "natural" sound.

If i need just a little desseing, i reach for the Waves...

rock

sdf
s.d.finley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st October 2004   #14
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 14

Lately I've been splitting the vocal into multiple tracks using a multiband compressor by recording the output of the split bands back to a 3 new tracks (with-out compression). The plan is to split the vocal into managable chunks (lo-mids. hi-mids, hi) then edit the volume of the the offending frequency range separately. The main problem I've had is if the filters are any steeper than 6db per octave phasing shifts are created (unless the MB is timealigned like the Waves linear).
dawkab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st October 2004   #15
Lives for gear
 
stealthbalance's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: united states
Posts: 627

Re: hi

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Alécio Costa
[B]I use a combination of Waves De-esser and some additional carving with Waves Q6.

Another tip: ask the singer if he touches the back of his teeth too much. There lives the source of the excessive S´s.
Also: ask him to slightly get the mouth off mics axis when he reaches some critical passenges with too much S.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

no offense but you must be stoned.

id like to see you ask some of the singers i work with that question - then see what happens.

getting tracks from engineers that have asked singers to move around to make up for their engineering hackery just makes me wanna hurt someone.
pick a mic quickly , and get on with the show by letting the singer just sing without thinking that they suck or need dental surgery.

s
stealthbalance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st November 2004   #16
Lives for gear
 
Alécio Costa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Brazil, Florianópolis/SC
Posts: 1,705

" offense but you must be stoned.

id like to see you ask some of the singers i work with that question - then see what happens.

getting tracks from engineers that have asked singers to move around to make up for their engineering hackery just makes me wanna hurt someone.
pick a mic quickly , and get on with the show by letting the singer just sing without thinking that they suck or need dental surgery."

Fortunately I do not work with your wannabee clients; And yes, it functions. If you study a little bit of vocal techniques and the approach of a vocal mic you will get the point. Also, I do not do drugs.
fuuck
Alécio Costa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st November 2004   #17
Lives for gear
 
stealthbalance's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: united states
Posts: 627

Quote:
Originally posted by Alécio Costa

Fortunately I do not work with your wannabee clients; And yes, it functions. If you study a little bit of vocal techniques and the approach of a vocal mic you will get the point. Also, I do not do drugs.
fuuck [/B]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

gee , i guess i ruffled your feathers bitch.

im usually not this harsh , but i guess you just dont get it.
statements like what you would tell a singer about their sss's are just so demo league is sickens me. its also turned many a mix ive done into a nightmare fixit job. you are thinking like an engineer and not like a musician or a music producer. look at the big picture and you'll realise what you are suggesting is really wrong.

s
stealthbalance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st November 2004   #18
Lives for gear
 
Alécio Costa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Brazil, Florianópolis/SC
Posts: 1,705

hi

I think you did not get the picture. It is not telling the singer to keep his hand shaking all the time neither to change the way he handles his tongue behind the front teeth.
I am a producer, singer and used to be a vocal instructor. I do know my stuff.
If you say you might be having lots of big problems on mix stage is because you mic might have a very bad off axis rsponse.
I have mixed over 50 albums in the last 5 years, some got MTV airplay, some were indicated for brazilian "Grammy" and never had any complaint about what are you pointing.
Alécio Costa is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
De-essing Gwen Stefani XHipHop So much gear, so little time! 47 12th December 2009 06:11 PM
De-Essing in PTools. share the wealth! cajonezzz Q&A with Charles Dye 23 8th April 2004 06:17 AM
De-essing for beginners jdier So much gear, so little time! 8 8th February 2004 09:40 PM
De-essing mac black So much gear, so little time! 17 24th September 2003 02:27 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:46 PM.

 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com Limited - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office: 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.