![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
| Music computers Music recording computers and issues relating to them. PC Moderator - George Necola, Switzerland. Mac Moderator - Geert van den Berg, Holland. |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Custom nudge value in Logic 8 | Van-C | Music computers | 6 | 19th September 2007 09:12 AM |
| nudge in digital performer 5 | mattianlaseppia | Music computers | 6 | 12th June 2007 06:59 PM |
| Noise gate question, please help! | miamidaddy | Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production | 5 | 9th January 2007 06:43 AM |
| gate sidechain question | vtone | So much gear, so little time! | 4 | 17th February 2006 01:06 AM |
| Question to Thrill re: DS201 gate/multing | Rainchild | High end | 3 | 26th July 2004 12:26 AM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Gear interested Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 9
| Gate latency nudge question I have a question about two things I've learned recently. I have recently learned the gate technique of nudging a dummy kick track say 50 samples forward (in time) to the key input of a gate on the kick you want to hear. I have also recently learned that putting the Dyn 3 gate on a track delays it by 96 samples and that this too should be nudged forward in time to compensate. So the question is since the main kick has a Dyn 3 on it and needs to be nudged, does the key input track need to be nudged and extra 96 on top of the 50 I'm doing? Thanks in advance. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear | to the best of my knwledge,...no. i usually go with 70-80 samples for the kick trigger. why? because charles dye in the "mix it" DVD has a trigger kick set 80 samples ahead of time. this seems to work just fine for me.
__________________ "can we make the guitar louder,..and the snare, and kick,..and maybe the bass to, oh and the vocals, and maybe bring up the cymbals a little bit" |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| FX smörgåsbord user Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Hollywood, FL
Posts: 845
| Quote:
__________________ Turn Me Up!™ – Bringing Dynamics Back to Music (TurnMeUp.org) MySpace – Bands, Models + Spam... kudya ask 4 more? MiLaR Forum – Advanced Mixing Techniques + MiX iT! Global Mixing Event Recent Projects – Indie, Alternative + Modern Rock Mix It Like A Record – DVD/DAW Session Based Mixing Course | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: New York
Posts: 391
| A gate with lookahead is preferable, but if doing it the old way then try a 5 ms nudge forward in time on the trigger track. |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,844
| Quote:
...otherwise the trigger will be 46samples later than the audio of course! Although Mr Dye's method is probably less hassle. | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear interested Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 9
| I have no problem, using a look a look-ahead if it's easy, but it seems I would still need to nudge that 96 samples to compensate for the latency, correct? Thanks for helping me to try and figure is out. |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |