Duet, What Are The Lowest Buffer Settings People Are Getting (Successfully)? - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Music Computers

Duet, What Are The Lowest Buffer Settings People Are Getting (Successfully)?
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 4th December 2007   #1
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: Boston Area
Posts: 1,361

Thread Starter
Duet, What Are The Lowest Buffer Settings People Are Getting (Successfully)?

Now that Duet has been out for a little bit, I am wondering how it's doing in regards to people's success or failure with low buffer settings.
Football is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 4th December 2007   #2
Gear nut
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 86

I've had my duet for one month, I just got a new one yesterday because there was a problem with the preamps not being matched on my first one (however, Apogee support was fantastic and made the process hastle free!) but with the old one and my 2.2gHz Santa Rosa Macbook Pro and Logic 8 with 10.5.1/10.4.10 I was doing 48kHz with a buffer of 64 and for bigger sessions a buffer of 128. I was actually a little disappointed I could not get lower as I am used to using TDM systems with very little latency but at a 64 buffer setting I did not have any problems unless I was playing really fast lines in which case I just used Maestro. Hope this helps.
Matt Fudge is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 4th December 2007   #3
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: Boston Area
Posts: 1,361

Thread Starter
Thanks for the feedback Matt. So Maestro allows you to get somewhere near no latency monitoring independently of Logic buffer settings?

Does that mean when you are using that setup you describe, no effects would be able to be used during that process?
Football is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12th December 2007   #4
Gear nut
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 86

Quote:
Originally Posted by Football View Post
Thanks for the feedback Matt. So Maestro allows you to get somewhere near no latency monitoring independently of Logic buffer settings?

Does that mean when you are using that setup you describe, no effects would be able to be used during that process?
Hey Football, sorry so late to get back to you, but yes you are correct. Using maestro to monitor gives you a near zero latency that is in the range of Pro Tools HD and analog tape, the only trade off is that you are listening to the signal right off the converters and not through the DAW. Therefore any inserts and bussing you have in place post converters will not be heard. Hope this helps.
Matt Fudge is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Screen SHUTS DOWN when using High Buffer settings PTLE 7.3.1 PC!!!! beau_mckee Music Computers 1 2nd September 2007 01:10 PM
Understanding I/O Buffer Settings Mr.Pibb Music Computers 3 6th August 2007 11:20 AM
Buffer settings in protools BlazinBeats Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 7 21st July 2007 10:54 AM
PT buffer settings... sonic difference? Improv Music Computers 21 24th April 2007 10:06 PM
Buffer settings for tracking VI's morebutter Music Computers 2 7th December 2006 11:48 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:39 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.