Login / Register
 
is firewire 800 "better" than 400?
New Reply
Subscribe
dashamu
Thread Starter
#1
29th November 2007
Old 29th November 2007
  #1
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 157

Thread Starter
dashamu is offline
is firewire 800 "better" than 400?

Hi,

I know I know, this is a tired thread but I can't seem to find a clear answer to whether Firewire 800 is better, faster, etc than 400.
I've been using a Glyph GT050 with Firewire 400 with my G5 Dual 2 (pre-intel) with no problems. But I have nothing to compare it to.
So, now that I need an additional drive I'm trying to decide on the Glyph quad drive with400, 800, usb2 and eSATA or stick with the tried and true GT050 series.
Anyone with experience with these formats please let me know what you think.

BTW, I'll be using the new drive exclusively for audio with DP5.1

thanks
#2
29th November 2007
Old 29th November 2007
  #2
Moderator
 
psycho_monkey's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Location: Sydney via London
Posts: 23,291
My Recordings/Credits

Send a message via Skype™ to psycho_monkey
psycho_monkey is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashamu View Post
Hi,

I know I know, this is a tired thread but I can't seem to find a clear answer to whether Firewire 800 is better, faster, etc than 400.
I've been using a Glyph GT050 with Firewire 400 with my G5 Dual 2 (pre-intel) with no problems. But I have nothing to compare it to.
So, now that I need an additional drive I'm trying to decide on the Glyph quad drive with400, 800, usb2 and eSATA or stick with the tried and true GT050 series.
Anyone with experience with these formats please let me know what you think.

BTW, I'll be using the new drive exclusively for audio with DP5.1

thanks
Faster, not better - but personally I've had more drives act flaky (losing connection and such) when using 800 than 400.
#3
29th November 2007
Old 29th November 2007
  #3
Gear Head
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Location: Franklin, TN
Posts: 55

hisboyelroy@his is offline
Yeah i haven't done any scientific measurements but my 800 drives are noticeably faster when transferring files. I haven't had any connection problems with 800 vs 400. If it's not much more $ having the 800 is worth it IMO.

Tim
#4
29th November 2007
Old 29th November 2007
  #4
Lives for gear
 
Beastie's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 1,573

Send a message via Skype™ to Beastie
Beastie is offline
Smile Yup

Yes it is! lol
#5
29th November 2007
Old 29th November 2007
  #5
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: Florida, New Jersey
Posts: 882

Send a message via AIM to AnAverageJoe
AnAverageJoe is offline
Faster, but to me no real point of getting it, Firewire 400 is good enough, if you want faster go with E Sata
__________________
- Joe
#6
29th November 2007
Old 29th November 2007
  #6
Lives for gear
 
Energie's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,107

Energie is offline
I had a firewire 800 drive, and I did notice better peformance with soft synths, it was a tad noticably better. But it flaked out alot, lost connection. So i now have a 800 to 400 connector and it hasn't acted up once. too bad
#7
29th November 2007
Old 29th November 2007
  #7
Lives for gear
 
hangman's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 587

hangman is offline
yes... I think fw800 is 400 better than fw400.
New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn  Submit Thread to Google+ Google+ 
 
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter / Forum
Replies
jwh1192 / High end
3
TorchMusic / Music Computers
16
halfguard / Music Computers
8
andre tchmil / Music Computers
6

Forum Jump

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.