MB / MBP with URS CSP - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Music Computers

MB / MBP with URS CSP
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 19th September 2007   #1
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 206

Thread Starter
MB / MBP with URS CSP

I asked this over at the URS CSP thread in the New Product Alert forum, but did'nt get any answers. So pleeeaaase...

Anyone using a MacBook or MacBook Pro (2.2 GHz model) with the URS Channel Strip Pro in Logic? I would simply love to know how many instances you can load before toasting the CPU...

Please anyone who has this stuff, tell me!
Heiko is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2007   #2
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 206

Thread Starter
Oh, and I would be very much interested in how many instances of the Waves SSL channel strip you can run on these machines!

Thanks to anybody for any answers!
Heiko is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2007   #3
Lives for gear
 
ProducerBoy's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: Here, There, and Everywhere.
Posts: 1,611

idk if this helps,
but I've run up to 20 intances of CS Pro in logic without any trouble on my MB 2.0 with 2 gb ram.
__________________
Sugar Hill Studios
ProducerBoy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2007   #4
Lives for gear
 
thermos's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 4,029

Why don't you just demo them both? CSP is pretty efficient given what it is. I didn't like the waves ssl stuff enough to do an efficiency test.
thermos is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2007   #5
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 206

Thread Starter
ProducerBoy,
thanks, it was indeed helpful, that was exactly the kind of info I was looking for!

thermos,
would love to demo them both. Problem is that I run a PC from the stone age and will get my Apple laptop and Logic Studio in October when Leopard is out. I still have not 100% decided if I want a MB or MBP. I will run it with an Apogee Duet later. The display size is not an issue, I will have an external one connected most of the time. So the MBP just has more connection options as the main advantage, namely the second FW port and the Expresscard34 slot.
Therefore I wondered if these machines have enough native horsepower, even if you want a good channel strip all over your mix with 30+ tracks to create a general colorisation or glue or whatever you want to call it. That would spare me maybe from getting some DSP powered stuff and drop the need for a MB Pro. I think just from the pure processing power, the MB and the MBP should not be THAT far apart from each other. But could be that I am totally wrong on that one.

Hence the question. Anybody else experience with this setup?
Heiko is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2007   #6
Lives for gear
 
thermos's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 4,029

You should be fine with the CSP and a Macbook or a Macbook Pro. The great thing about the CSP plug is if you start to run out of horsepower, the included stripped down version sounds great and takes about 1/10th the cpu. I've done a few full mixes on my Macbook and used CSP on every channel.
thermos is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2007   #7
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 206

Thread Starter
Thanks for the info, thermos! So there is enough native power there.

I am getting more and more excited about getting my machine in Octobre! Maybe I just invest a bit more money and take the Pro... then I will never doubt the decision later and feel like "I should have taken the bigger one".
Heiko is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2007   #8
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 2,854

I will try it in Logic 8 on my MacBook today and let you know. I bet you could at least get close to mixing an entire song with it. Logic 8 seems very efficient, and if you compress and EQ every track anyway the CPU usage shouldn't be that much different with the CSP.
__________________
Daily news & reviews
ProToolerBlog.com
Stiff is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2007   #9
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 206

Thread Starter
Thanks, stiff, looking forward to hearing your results!

You are all a nice bunch of guys!
Heiko is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2007   #10
Lives for gear
 
ProducerBoy's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: Here, There, and Everywhere.
Posts: 1,611

Another thing to consider is the ExpressCard slot on the MBP. I'm really wishing I had one on my MB so I could run some of the UAD plugs. If you're not interested in those plugs, then like thermos said, either will do just fine.
ProducerBoy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2007   #11
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 206

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by ProducerBoy View Post
Another thing to consider is the ExpressCard slot on the MBP. I'm really wishing I had one on my MB so I could run some of the UAD plugs. If you're not interested in those plugs, then like thermos said, either will do just fine.
Yes, the UA stuff sounds amazing. I worked with it lots a while back, LOVED the 1176LN, LA2A, Cambridge and Pultec. I just wonder if I might be able to replace the vintage emus by the URS CSP. The reverbs, Cambridge and the PL might be possibly replaced by Sonnox EQ, Reverb and Limiter...

But you are absolutely right - as I wrote earlier, I might get the Pro just not to miss any options later. Maybe I will find myself eagerly wanting to use UAD plugs.

(Just for the record: I am just a bit discouraged to use the UAD on the Expresscard Slot because the UAD-Xpander has only the horsepower of one single card, and that is not very much. And a Magma chassis with 2 or more cards is not very handy to carry around anymore. Going all native would really be a nice thing to do!)
Heiko is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2007   #12
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 2,854

Heiko, took a bit longer than expected - but here's what I did:

* Created 8 mono audio tracks and 8 stereo audio tracks, each with a copy of URS Strip Pro.

* Ran three instances of Amplitube 2 (it's heavy, much heavier than the CSP).

* One instance of EZ Drummer (which later was removed).

* Recorded on the audio tracks (well, used loops on some of them actually).

No problems whatsoever! I then decided to "master" it directly in the mix, using seven other plug-in on the main out. Still worked fine.

Then I got tired and didn't know what else to do...
Stiff is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2007   #13
Lives for gear
 
thermos's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 4,029

I don't use my UAD plugs after purchasing CSP, FWIW.
thermos is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2007   #14
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 206

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stiff View Post
Heiko, took a bit longer than expected - but here's what I did:

* Created 8 mono audio tracks and 8 stereo audio tracks, each with a copy of URS Strip Pro.

* Ran three instances of Amplitube 2 (it's heavy, much heavier than the CSP).

* One instance of EZ Drummer (which later was removed).

* Recorded on the audio tracks (well, used loops on some of them actually).

No problems whatsoever! I then decided to "master" it directly in the mix, using seven other plug-in on the main out. Still worked fine.

Then I got tired and didn't know what else to do...
I understand that was on a MacBook, not Pro? Which one? The 2.16GHz?
Anyway, sounds like pretty amazing processing power!

Quote:
I don't use my UAD plugs after purchasing CSP, FWIW.
Wow. Then it must sound REALLY good.

I think I will really go all native and get URS CSP and the Sonnox sixpack...

Thanks a lot, everybody, you really made my decisions a lot easier!
Heiko is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2007   #15
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 2,854

Yes, a MacBook 2ghz, 2gb ram.
Stiff is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2007   #16
Lives for gear
 
ProducerBoy's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: Here, There, and Everywhere.
Posts: 1,611

Quote:
Originally Posted by thermos View Post
I don't use my UAD plugs after purchasing CSP, FWIW.
I love the CSP, so that makes me feel better.
ProducerBoy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2007   #17
Gear addict
 
Joined: May 2006
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 301

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heiko View Post
I think I will really go all native and get URS CSP and the Sonnox sixpack...

Thanks a lot, everybody, you really made my decisions a lot easier!

I'm with you! I have one UAD and love it. Also just got Sonnox stuff. But rather than more UAD, I'm going for URS CS Pro.
If UAD goes native (no card), I'll buy lots more becuase I do love their plugs.
slopeshoulder is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
URS CSP EQ on Master, MP3 Posted Bang Mastering forum 0 4th September 2007 12:24 AM
URS CSP "lite" vs. classic console channel strip pro... n8tron Music Computers 3 8th July 2007 01:31 AM
How much RAM do I need in a MB or MBP OHA Music Computers 8 22nd October 2006 07:26 PM
laptop (mbp) or desktop? dcrann11 Music Computers 5 15th June 2006 03:25 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:50 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.