![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Logic user shaking in his boots | audiomichael | New Product Alert! | 87 | 25th January 2007 02:02 PM |
| Logic and PT LE user: Interface Question | Tonal-Retentive | Music computers | 4 | 17th October 2006 04:33 PM |
| Logic user ?forums? | Blast9 | Music computers | 4 | 22nd June 2006 06:39 PM |
| another really dumb logic question | fatty | Music computers | 6 | 8th November 2003 12:54 AM |
| REALLY dumb Logic Audio question.... | STILL | Music computers | 10 | 7th November 2003 01:30 AM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: California
Posts: 116
| Dumb Logic Questions from non-logic user I posted this in one of the other logic 8 threads, but it got overlooked (not surprising considering there currently about 9,957 logic 8 threads). Obviously Logic 8 looks pretty cool, and I would love to give it a try. I use Protools as my main platform, and I have absolutely no knowledge of logic. If someone could help me out with a couple of basic questions, that would be great. #1- how easy/difficult it is to open and transfer sessions between PT and loigc? What info gets lost, and how time consuming is it? #2 - I always assumed that becasue Logic used Apples coreaudio that you could use the app without any external hardware for simple editing tasks, in much the same way that Garageband can work without any external hardware. Is this true? thanks! JOEL ps - any other non-logic users may feel free to hijack this thread with Logic questions, if you are so inclined (and if logic users are so willing to answer!).
__________________ www.sitmom.com |
| | |
| | #2 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2005 Location: cloud nine
Posts: 2,352
| Quote:
I'd wager you don't really want to use the built-in speaker. I've been using the computer's optical S/PDIF output into the 192 interface. With some adjusting of PT's hardware setup, this does work, but it's less than elegant, and you're restricted to 44.1, 48, or 96. I run music sessions at 88.2, so that eliminates simultaneous use of Logic. I've ordered a sample rate converter from Behringer that will take mutiple formats, convert the sample rate, and output all those formats simultaneously, as well as analog, so you can bring the analog outs up on the patchbay. Yeah, it's a Behringer, but it's going to handily solve a few issues like that.
__________________ "and a turbine fire truck with no brakes it would teach people to get the fuk out of the way" - big country | |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Gear nut Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: California
Posts: 116
| Quote:
That is great. The ability to plug in some headphones and edit on my laptop (without having to carry an Mbox around) would be fantastic.
__________________ www.sitmom.com | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: PDX
Posts: 480
| Hi! #1 depends on how complicated your PT sessions are. I am going thru this, and it is not fun. Moving between any DAW and another is not fun IMO. I am going in and doing the simple thing tho: Consolidate each track, so that I have a "start at bar 1" region for each track, then rename the actual audio file. For MIDI, export as .mid, naming each consolidated MIDI region-track as I did with audio. Now the fun part... Launch Logic, and then open the .mid file. Do not import into an open song/project. Simply right-click on the .mid file, and choose Logic as the app to use. This will open the .mid file with makrers, tempo and meter changes intact. Next create the audio tracks you need, and import those audio tracks. With the .mid created tracks, simply insert the VI of your choice. I like to compose MIDI drums on seperate tracks some times. Before exporting, I prefer to combine/merge all the MIDI drum tracks to a single one. #2: already answered. But, to add.... I use a Mac Pro, and also a MacBook Pro. I love to be able to simply sit in bed with my MBP and a set of headphones plugged into the built-in sound output, and use Logic. No dongles (unless I am using plugs that need one), no extra cables, unless I want to use a larger MIDI keyboard or live instrument. Caps Lock to bring up an onscreen piano keyboard is awesome for just doing some quick stuff like that. Make the rig as small, or as large, as you want ![]()
__________________ nikki k |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Gear nut Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: California
Posts: 116
| Quote:
Hey nikki thanks for the info! the one time I tried to use a PT session on a non PT rig it was a bit of a drag. We used Digitranslator (bit of a waste of Money IMHO) and saved as OMF, then opened in Nuendo (I think it was Nuendo- it was over a year ago so my memory is fading!) for my friend to mix on. Maybe I did something wrong but I remember it was a bit of a mess. we had all the audio (we didn't have midi tracks so no probs there), but many simple edits I made in protools seemed to be messed up, and all fades were def gone. So quite a bit of time was spent re-editing and making sure things were as they should be. I was wondering if it would alway be that much of a hassle to go between two DAW's? In Logic you can save as OMF without any "translator" right? I wonder if Opening OMF files in Protools Or Logic is any better perhaps? thanks!!! JOEL
__________________ www.sitmom.com | |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |