![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #61 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,228
| Quote:
Now to record back input 3-4 to the DAW, assuming you have a separate bus out first, adress input 3-4 to the B-output. From here, record the B-out in the DAW to the inputs it is connected to (software monitoring off). Everything you will hear during this process will be from the main outs on the sum box. Now play back the newly recorded processed drum sub and mute the original. Without a B-out one would have to solo the drum sub in the DAW while recording the main outs on the sumbox (software monitor off), again everything that is heard here is thru the monitor out from the from the sumbox. | |
| | |
| | #62 | ||
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,304
| Quote:
hardware monitoring is near-0 latency, but not perfect 0. so there's still latency. also, when using hardware monitoring, the drumsub return does not pass thru ITB MixBus Compression, which many ppl use including me; hence it's still guess work to see if the Outboard effect is working or not... until after the printing, or otherwise to use software monitoring. a perfectly implemented ADC will allow outboard return sync using software monitoring, so to solve a problem such as mixing into a MixBus Compre. the possible problematic scenarios can be numerous depending on the mixer. your method is assuming that one invests in a sumbox/mixer, and uses the sumbox to monitor the sum of Main and Sub-Out. but when returned back into DAW and printed, the result does not come out the same as what you monitored earlier with the sumbox, thus negating having the sumbox in the first place. again, this issue does not require one to buy a sumbox; the minimal requirement is a multi-out converter. Quote:
--- PS: one doesn't mute the original drums when using parallel compression.
__________________ "You can imagine where it goes from here." "He fixes the cable?" | ||
| | |
| | #63 | ||||||
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,228
| Quote:
Latency fixer is for live monitoring, not the case here. Rounding errors will occur even in HD if the delay is inbetween sample values, the only way to fix it is by nudging after the the part has been recorded, no DAW will fix this. But atleast you wont hear it while monitoring if you do it in hardware Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() Quote:
Anyway, this is getting tedious. One could do this by using the Latency fixer or by monitoring in hardware. My point in my first post was that by using hardware monitoring you will be certain that what you hear when listening to the inserts will play back in sync, no funny stuff or worries about whats going on in the box. I notice that you keep on moving the target from the latency that is caused by a software insert to sample rounding and possible errors with the recording delay. Both sample rounding and problems with recording delay settings apply to both methods. Its the latency caused by software inserts that is the issue here and it is possible to overcome this by using hardware monitoring. | ||||||
| | |
| | #64 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,304
|
it's getting pretty tiresome over here as well. the "targets" you mentioned all has to do with the variables and results that concern with this matter, and there's certain terminology/methodology that we're not seeing eye-to-eye here; IOW it's not just one simple thing. otherwise, we wouldn't be posting like this. my main point here is that your OTB summing is not the solution to Logic's short-comings, in fact it's a little OT (esp when recording back into DAW).. and Latency Fixer is not the end-all medication either. so right back at you regarding the trolling, but i'm sure we're both coming from good intentions. i'm glad you found a way that works for you, and i hope either Logic can implement something or others can adapt to this issue. ![]() |
| | |
| | #65 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,304
| Quote:
how's the hardware delay compared to L7? are you still using Latency Fixer? haven't had time to upgrade (mixing a project on PT now), plus i'm still waiting on Logic 8.1... | |
| | |
| | #66 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2005 Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,661
|
Have Logic 8 on my composition machine at home, but no outboard to try it with yet, not until our studio is done and the gear is set up. I don't really know what Fredrik is talking about either (sorry Fredrik) but if there is truly a way to record the results of outboard back into your DAW and have logic automatically compensate for it, it certainly is news to me. As far as I know, there's going to be latency (on my old G5 system it was around 140 samples, that's no small change) ... and that latency will have to be shoved around using latency fixer, or worse, by hand.
__________________ -Matthew |
| | |
| | #67 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,304
| Quote:
the problem (like i mentioned before w/ Fredrik) is when auditioning, Latency Fixer is needed; but i was having a hard time finding the right amount of samples since i switched to Intel Mac. when i had a G5, the samples was always 220 (as suggested by Dr.DeltaM, since we both were running Logic and FF800). so when tweaking an inst in solo, it's golden. when tweaking with other inst, not as easy... gotta tweak and print, listen, then start over if changes needed. felt like i had hardware Audio-Suite or something. ![]() and yes, parallel comp is a bitch. the only parallel of anything i'm able to do at this point is ITB plugs. another issue with compensation is when there's Rewired tracks, e.g. Reason. but things drift there not because of latency, but a PPQ mismatch between Reason and Logic. hope you get your studio up and running soon! | |
| | |
| | #68 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2006 Location: London
Posts: 1,434
| Quote:
The problem is that the sumbox forces you to have your outboard at the end of the chain. No automation or plug-ins can be used post outboard. I'm now starting to conceive a new mixing set-up for when the new Lynx PCIe card comes out: ---- 12 mono tracks: Lynx AES output Channels 1-12 -> D/A -> Patchbay -> outboard -> A/D -> Lynx AES input Channels 1-12 ---- The monitor outputs: Lynx AES output Channels 15-16 -> D/A -> PVC -> Monitors Ok, so in this scenario the mix is happening ITB, but the 12 DAW stems are being sent to outboard like any regular plugin insert. If the outboard is needed to track instruments, you use the Lynx monitor mixer to send the DAW stems to the Lynx AES output Channels 15-16. The only downside is that you are forced to use a plugin as your mix-bus compressor, unless you send the 2-track outputs from Lynx AES out Channels 13-14 -> D/A -> 2-bus Comp -> A/D -> Lynx AES in Channels 15-16. But perhaps it would be better to wait until mastering before doing this rather than at the mix stage. | |
| | |
| | #69 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,062
|
i could use the total mix software that comes with the fireface to accomplish this. but anyway-my post was just a response to the other poster who mentioned going outboard and summing the results analog. I wasnt trying to defend Logic lack of latency compensation for external inputs. |
| | |
| | #70 |
| Gear nut Joined: May 2006
Posts: 146
|
I'm relatively new to Logic and parallel compression via outboard on a drum sub is exactly what I am hoping to do. The latency that it is introducing is making phase misery. Summing in the analog domain is out of my reach having gone into the red buying Logic in the first place and I am limited to 10 ins and outs anyhow. I will obviously need to research the "Latency Fixer" feature more as being able to use i/o plugin for for outboard mixing is one of the reasons I was attracted to Logic in the first place.
|
| | |
| | #71 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 346
| record delay parameter
hello, does anyone know how to switch the "record delay" parameter in logic 8 [the one in preferences: audio] back and forth from samples to milliseconds? i do not see the info. anywhere in the manual. thanks. userofgear |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Delay Compensation in Logic Pro 7 for Outboard: How Do YOU do it it? | Matthew Murray | Music computers | 11 | 22nd January 2007 05:54 AM |
| Any idea how to calculate the Hardware delay compensation on PT inserts | andre tchmil | Music computers | 4 | 18th October 2006 10:57 PM |
| Homemade hardware i/o DAW delay compensation... | PapillonIrl | So much gear, so little time! | 9 | 10th September 2006 01:42 AM |
| Logic Pro 7 Delay Compensation? | chrisrulesmore | Music computers | 17 | 21st April 2006 03:41 AM |
| Does Logic 6.x have Auto Delay Compensation? | jeronimo | Music computers | 2 | 23rd July 2003 06:44 PM |
| |