![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| M160 on Grand Piano.. | 2db | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 10 | 21st November 2006 12:28 PM |
| Live Piano Concert Recording | Krnuernberge | Work In Progress / Advice Requested / Show & Tell / Artist Showcase | 2 | 6th October 2006 09:03 PM |
| Synthogy Ivory v1.5 Concert Grand Piano Plug-In | jdjustice | Music computers | 23 | 8th July 2006 06:17 PM |
| When you actually would like to have a grand piano | Ruphus | So much gear, so little time! | 23 | 19th May 2003 01:16 AM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 7
| motif xs concert grand piano vs piano software and hooking it up hey, can someone tell me how much better software piano sounds than motif xs' grand piano preset? synthogy ivory akoustic piano steinberg the grand xs' is much better than logic's that's for sure...but i just want to know how you all feel about me spending the extra money for ivory or akoustic? i have a macbook pro and apogee ensemble for audio interface (firewire). i know i need a dedicated hardrive for streaming samples from synthogy ivory...firewire hardrive. how will that work on a laptop since i already have the ensemble using up my firewire port? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear Head | I borrowed a few piano libraries, ArtVista Virtual Grand, Eastwest Boesendorfer, The Grand 2 and Akoustik Piano and tried them against my Roland Fantom X6 with the stock pianosounds. I must say that the ArtVista is the best software virtual piano experience of all above mentioned that I've used. And it was pretty easy on the RAM too, about 250mb. The others where huge resourcehogs, like 1-2 gig of RAM usage and took ages to load...at least compared to the Roland synth :) If you get the chance, check out ArtVista. You may like it alot. For me it's not all about the sound quality though, it's about the playability. And that's where the Roland in my case really shines. It's within one single unit, fast loading times and plays really well. The sounds really sticks out in LIVE situations and on recordings, where many large piano libraries wouldn't. AND since the Motif XS is like 2007 and the Fantom X is 2004 (I think), it wouldn't be surpricing if the Motif sounded better. Good Luck ![]() |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
__________________ Apogee Rosetta 200, Lexicon PCM91, DSI Evolver, Microwave XTK, Korg Triton Extreme 61, Alesis Fusion 8HD, Yamaha TG77, Roland JD990, Roland D550, SCA N72s | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear Head | Absolutely. There are many late 90's synths that have excellent sounds that by them selves sounds crap but in the mix sounds perfect. |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Gear nut | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Nashville
Posts: 1,322
| FWIW...Akoustic piano didn't sound as good as my Kurzweil Pc2x in overall tone/playability. I've not had the chance to use Ivory. The orginal Gigapiano DOES outdo it...Giga will run at a 128k buffer...responds well...nice resonance-rings forever. I liked the MotifES's piano better than my Kurz...so...if you take Ivory out of the mix, I can honestly guess just use whatcha got. |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |