![]() | All Advertisers |
| | #1 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 233
Thread Starter | Nebula I figure its time for an updated evaluation thread here. For me, it's a very promising tool so far - I've come to replace as many ordinary plug-ins as CPU allows. Pros: - Fidelity (has to be experienced) - Versatility (almost everything in one plug; pres, comps, EQs, reverbs, etc.) - Amazing value (€20 for Nebula2, which uses the same engine as Nebula3 and provides access to the entire library, €80 for Nebula3 is still extremely cheap) - Support (friendly staff, quick to help and very open to suggestions) Cons: - CPU (a dozen or so EQs will bring a Core2Duo to its knees) - Irregular presets (many are duds, dynamics tend to distort very easily) - Windows only (yeah, well) |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Beautiful NYC
Posts: 1,161
| All in all, it's pretty remarkable, methinks. But it is, for all intents and purposes, an fx sampler, and therein lies its greatest "flaw" as well -- it's only as good as the sample patch you've pulled up. A great number of the presets in Nebula are, as you stated and IMHO as well, less than stellar. True, one can remove them if one removes the properly named files from the proper folders, and it's also true that this will improve as more and more users sample better and better gear. But the fact remains that many of the patches one can currently pull up are underwhelming. On the other hand, the dozen or so patches that work for me really do something special, and in some cases with a quality that I've yet to see matched in plugin form. This, for me, makes all my quibbles about lesser patches pale a bit in insignificance. This plugin can really have astonishing quality with the right patch in the right situation. I was a low-level beta tester for them, and I was HAPPY to contribute the full price for Nebula3 (over and above their protests!) because I truly, actually believe in the technology they're pioneering. I really think they're on to something. Cheers. ![]()
__________________ |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear | You forgot to add to the pro's list: Constantly expanding set of presets with more and more hi-end gear being sampled. Amazing plugin, just keeps getting better and better! |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Netherlands
Posts: 631
| I think that Nebula is a very nice concept, especially within an audio-editor. You can process/render a signal within a program like Sound Forge as many times as you like. It, however, takes a little basic experience, but the results are astonishing! Still not analog, but what do you expect?
__________________ http://www.davidclarkson.nl |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Brighton UK
Posts: 106
| i would agree with mr empty planet... some of the presets are amazing! some of them don't even work... the ones that are amazing are FAR better than any plugin on the market, they sound somehow 'real' rather than the plastic of most plugins... somehow 'analogue'. you need to hear it to understand! its not just some new plugin, it really is a whole new level of sound quality in the world of plugins. perhaps we can talk about the great presets... mr planet, which ones are you using? i very much like the vintage eq, vintage phaser (when it works, depending on program material), ssl eq, the new hispasonic reverbs, vintage plate, analogue channel... the list goes on, there are just so many to choose from. I intend to delete all the ones what won't get used, saves time thinking about them! i suggest anyone who doesn't 'risk' £20 to try this needs serious help ![]() |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: C o p e n h a g e n
Posts: 858
| What's the difference between the 20 and the 80 Euro version ? (apart from 60 Euros) ![]() |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Beautiful NYC
Posts: 1,161
| Hey David, I probably just use what everybody else does. There are various eq flavors that are really quite nice, I probably use it more for eqs than anything else. Sometimes the 747 compressor -- though of course the attack and release can controls are hardly what you would call sensitive -- can add a punch that nothing else quite can, but it's highly track dependent. Occasionally I've found some of the other compressors quite impressive, but it's hit and miss, the Nebula compressors aren't predictable enough for me to consider them "workhorse" tools. A tiny bit of the Vitalizer effect is pretty remarkable sometimes.I haven't found a real use for the Analogue Channel type settings, but maybe I haven't found the proper method to realize such a subtle effect in the context of a mix. How do you wind up using the thing? Cheers. ![]() |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Berlin
Posts: 307
| Examples Here are a couple of examples After all these discussions I had to post these because I think they sound so good. Michael |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 15
| Its very early days and this plugin is already a world beater in many respects. Some of the presets aren't amazing but thats due to what they were sampling was not too amazing. Some others are however astonishing and I think before too long the preset list will be a wishlist of all the top equipment in the world pretty much. I, however, am most looking forward to the release of the Sampler so I can make my own experimental presets. There are so so many things that could be sampled. Basically anything that will pass acoustic, vibrational or electrical energy :D |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 233
Thread Starter | Maybe we could make a list here of unusable presets. I can't remember off the top of my head, but there are quite a few. So far, only the interface, although this is quite a value in itself, as the old interface is awkward to maneuver. By buying Nebula 3 you also get access to future improvements, as Nebula 2 is a closed case. |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Berlin
Posts: 307
| I think every preset is usable it just depends on what you want to use it and how far you are willing to go creatively. Maybe we could do a list with presets that work well on certain things or categories and don't on others. Michael |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: C o p e n h a g e n
Posts: 858
| Quote:
So you get the 5-6 gig library with Nebula 2 ? | |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 233
Thread Starter | |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Richmond Hill, Ontario (Canada)
Posts: 3,203
| Just when you think you have enough CPU power someone comes along and foks it all up for you ![]() This thing is an absolute PIG on resources. The technology is great but it is perhaps just a little too far ahead of its time. The gui is still not ideal but it is useable. I do agree that this plug in is extremely cheap for what you are getting. They need to work on a better solution for the EQ patches. Controlling one EQ band per patch is not how I want to work. If I wanted to have access to a four band EQ I would need to run four instances of some of the patches tutt That is not how I want to work. Compressors, Reverb and Tape plugs are good and useable but it is hard for me to dedicate up to 12% of my Dual - Dual Cores resources towards one plug instance. Maybe in a few years when we all 16+ cores and a DAW that can properly manage that kind of power, this plug will become more of a reality. Until then this plug will get very sparing use by me personally.
__________________ "In the time of chimpanzees I was a monkey" - Beck, Loser "I do use compressors/limiters but not for controlling dynamics, I use EQ for that!" Jp22 (damn I miss him) "Education is a progressive discovery of our own ignorance." -- Will Durant, historian (1885-1981) "I try to get a boom out of the bass drum, in one of my albums, my CD, boom, I try to get that big boom, I could not get a big boom, I paid bucks, and could not get the boom" - Recording Expert, Tad Donley |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Berlin
Posts: 307
| Next year we'll see the rise of the Octocores which should be sufficient CPU power for this kinda processing (We already had reported 40 instances of Nebula on a quadcore). For now I'm fine with my dual core mixing one track at a time with 6 to 8 instances at the highest quality and then just bouncing. And for that sound I'd even do it with half the power. Michael |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Tampa Bay/Cape Fear NC
Posts: 1,029
| I was surprised by just inserting the Mackie VLZ panner at its imaging compared to the internal Samplitude pan. The interface is still klunky in some ways, and I get some crackling and popping on some presets, but I do like the verbs. The tape sims show promise as well. Back to the panner as I insert that a bit...I wish it would snap or detent back to center. It's pretty fiddly trying to get the slider quickly back to 0. |
| | |
| | #18 | |
| Gear addict Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Berlin
Posts: 307
| Quote:
And yeah the panner is great. It really gives you the sound that makes it come "out of" your speaker. Michael | |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Tampa Bay/Cape Fear NC
Posts: 1,029
| Thanks for the tip!! |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 233
Thread Starter | le bump |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 390
| Nobody noticed phase issue with the verbs? It's particularly obvious when it's used as send fx... ![]() |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 612
| verbs are without pre-delay at all. The amount of predelay should be inserted using a different plug-in or adding delay from the host (almost every host has such control), a tipical reverb amount is around 80 milliseconds, but it's better if you tune with the host tempo. We'll add the pre-delay control as soon as possible! |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 233
Thread Starter | A couple of months have passed since I started this thread, and the library has been expanded. Updated opinions? To me, the EQ presets definately remain Nebula's strongest asset. |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Hamburg , Germany
Posts: 86
| |
| | |
| | #25 |
| Lives for gear | I downloaded the free Nebula and Aquavox from their website and have been using them for a few days now. The sound is pleasantly 'analog', and definitely worth checking it out. I really like how they make stuff sound classy with little effort. Problem is, opening instances within Cubase 4.5.2 makes the system (Intel iMac) somewhat unstable. Example: with a few instances open I can not save during playback. If I do, crackles pop up, and the only way to get rid of them is to exit and restart Cubase. I suspect it has something to do with delay compensation, because when inserted on a track, switching between 'dry' and 'processed' produces strange artifacts that are all time-related. And this at 1024 samples! Still, if the full version is bomb-proof and reliable, I think their asking price is an absolute bargain. |
| | |
| | #26 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 302
| What are the good presets so i delete the crappy ones.. |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Hmmmm - NEBULA | void | Music computers | 25 | 30th June 2010 08:32 AM |
| |