![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What do YOU use REAPER for? | pipelineaudio | Q &A with - Justin Frankel (designer of Reaper) | 5 | 14th April 2007 09:25 PM |
| reaper question. | manning1 | Q &A with - Justin Frankel (designer of Reaper) | 4 | 10th April 2007 12:27 AM |
| What's the catch with Reaper? | PoorGlory | Music computers | 578 | 6th April 2007 08:28 PM |
| Reaper on OSX ! | mahasandi | Music computers | 37 | 7th March 2007 05:31 PM |
| How 2 edit in Reaper !! | Ravian | Music computers | 3 | 21st February 2007 06:19 PM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2007 Location: Tusc/Bham AL
Posts: 696
| Ive been checking out Reaper latley and so far im really impressed. I'm on a 1.2 GHz AMD w/ 256M RAM 7200RPM HDD. The sleekness, the no bullshit, the small footprint, everything is looking pretty good. Im right smack in the middle of mixing a 8 song project and even with the new program adaptation (pretty easy jump from Sonar i think) my workflow is way faster. Last song i mixed took my half as long simply because of the down-to-earthness of the automation compared to the old sonar i was using. I can't speak for the current sonar because my pc is below the min requirement. Only thing i can remember at the moment; I wish you could adjust the width of the meters in the mixer, I dont need them to be more than say 25px wide. I cant figure out yet how to get my radium49 to control faders with banking either. Im sure theres a way though. ![]() Who else uses Reaper here? Anyone 'big' use Reaper? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Mac Moderator Join Date: May 2003 Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 2,643
| I am waiting for a full featured Mac version... ![]() |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 553
| What's Reaper? And where's Manning? He's usually right on top of any Reaper thread in about 2 nanoseconds.
__________________ "make multitrack sound for long long time" |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 340
| REAP rawks welcome to the revolution ![]() ![]() |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 340
| |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 205
| Click the link here ( Enter a nickname ) to go to the realtime reaper chat channel if you have pressing questions. Some of the newer meters in the advanced skinning system are thinner |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Berlin
Posts: 258
| Why does Reaper look like ACID? Michael |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 205
| Why does a ford look like a chevy? Acid: http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:..._Large_012.png REAPER: Shup : The free multi-host screenshot, image, and file uploader for Windows |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: New England
Posts: 1,067
| That GUI is a friggin' mess to look at... |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear addict | Let the nitpicks begin.... I've just found I can run Reaper in Linux using WINE. It actually runs pretty well, and is hella easier to use than Ardour. |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Gear maniac | Nice that it runs in Linux, I tried getting Samplitude to work under WINE, and it would not have that at ALL! Yeah, and I personally hated Ardour... I might check this out in Linux. Even if the GUI looks basically the same as Ardour, from that one screenshot posted at least. |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2004 Location: canada
Posts: 3,234
| i'm 6feet one 220 , n work out lol. n ive just had many nanoseconds sleep. there are a boatload of themes on the cockos site under themes. some pretty amazering imho. look n ye shall find. REAPER Color Themes and Icon Sets - Cockos Confederated Forums
__________________ i'm just a dumb computer engr (ret'd)...."quantum computing is the future" running a native software studio daw...Powertracks and Reaper on amd. my little songs www.motagator.com/bmanning (saving up for pristine ADA convertors i cant afford...lol) |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 117
| I'm 6'7", 286 lbs and I use reaper.... that big enough :D.... that being said, I am still a newbeeeeeee |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: NYC
Posts: 756
| There are many many cool things about Reaper. I left Cubase SX3 and tried it for a month. My overall impression: For my needs, it's not quite ready for prime time. The dogged resistance to utilizing the concept of tools anywhere in the interface leads to an idiosyncratic, heavy-on-the-hotkeys mode of working, but one can adapt to that. MIDI implementation, however, has a long way to go. People who aren't reliant on MIDI will enjoy it more, but I found it incredibly frustrating to work with. The way it creates and stores files, I also found -- again for me -- to be a mess. Additionally, there's a long list of workaround procedures for working with VSTi with multiple outs. Etc., etc., etc. On the other hand it does a great number of things really well. Quality, highly customizable signal path. Fantastic routing. Quite a nice list of very positive features, actually. It's just that the pluses didn't outweigh the negatives for me, though I'm happy I contributed some money to the ongoing Reaper development fund, and I may very well be going back in a couple off years when it's come into its potential. I have to say that, much against expectations, I found myself breathing a huge sigh of relief when I went back to SX3 and was again putting mixes together in a stable, predictable, fully realized environment. Cheers all. ![]()
__________________ .......... .......... "You can only get as good as you can tell you suck." ............................................. ............................................--Peeder |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 340
| Quote:
One thing, the file system caused a lot of problems for a lot of people but I found that there are several options in the project creation dialogue, for managing files ... I don't know how long they've been there but it appears that file creation and storage is a lot more sensible at this time... anyway, we'll see how it gets along | |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 67
| Reaper is the shit for mixing! I'm sure the MIDI will catch up. Sure, there are some other minor annoyances I have to deal with but the flexible routing and stable operation make up for those! Like the original poster, I'm 2-3 times faster mixing in Reaper than any Steinberg software, mainly b/c of the routing matrix and flexibility. Reaper is not a perfect match for everyone, but it is for me! Every time I have to open an old project in Nuendo I get really pissed off. When I open Reaper I am (almost) always smiling! Anyone on a PC who hasn't checked this program out owes it to themselves to give it a shot! -jim bob p.s. buy the damn thing for $40 if you use it!! |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 18
| I use Sonar for MIDI (although I don't use a ton of vstis) and Samplitude for a lot of my vanilla audio needs. I'm impressed by the performance options in Reaper which allow it to run heavier projects more smoothly than other hosts. Personally, I'm not one to get in debates over which product ppl should use. A lot of that sort of thing is subjective. However, Reaper is a very viable product and should be an option if you're looking for a replacement or you're just now looking to join the DAW world. I've used it to track and mix a couple of 50+ track projects. You certainly can't beat the price. |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: USA - Indiana
Posts: 771
| OMG I thought Reaper threads finally disappeared. |
| | |
| | #19 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Nashville
Posts: 1,322
| Quote:
![]() ...i've not even tried it. All I use software for is MIDI/VSTi hosting. I'm encouraged by the concept, though. I personally think they'd be better to leave MIDI out all together. They could take the market of people who just record. There's no point in big packages like Cubase and Logic for audio recording/mixing, IMO. A lot of the learning curve relates back to the MIDI sequencing mentality--and people who didn't grow up with that seem to have "mindset" issues with it. At the same time...I'd like to see an open source type project to be a MIDI sequencing/VSTi host. I'm sure I'm not the only one using hardware to record/mix audio. Something that's 64bit from the start...but, can host 32bit plugs-giving each their own 4gb memory space. Running under a stripped out Linux distro would rock. Hell--make it part of the download. | |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 205
| Empty Planet, thanks for your honest assessment. Hopefully the MIDI will be on par soon. |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: NYC
Posts: 756
| Hey Pipe, you're a spirited dude -- you make the net a better place. Loved your "Kill 315hz" thread on another forum all those years ago. ![]() Did me worlds of good. Cheers. ![]()
__________________ .......... .......... "You can only get as good as you can tell you suck." ............................................. ............................................--Peeder |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2004 Location: canada
Posts: 3,234
| lets not forget that rpr can be run of a lil old usb pen drive. so all i need to take to a mates studio is the usb drive... and my song to work on. popmann... frankly i'm amazed re linux no ones developed a daw multitrack software to run on a mini linux distro of 50mb. like dam small linux..(or feather..), which is one thing that interested me. the linux distros are just too huge imho. ideally a OS encompassing the daw software , totalling 50mb i'm hoping will occur one day. ie.the OS is totally non existent to the user. who just sees the main daw track screen on boot up of the pc. (similar concept to stand alone recorders...i think tascam x-48 is like this ??)
__________________ i'm just a dumb computer engr (ret'd)...."quantum computing is the future" running a native software studio daw...Powertracks and Reaper on amd. my little songs www.motagator.com/bmanning (saving up for pristine ADA convertors i cant afford...lol) |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2007 Location: Tusc/Bham AL
Posts: 696
| this is what my reaper looks like. not cluttered at all if you ask me. |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: May 2005 Location: Michigan
Posts: 211
| I am looking too at Reaper as a replacement for Cubase or maybe just another tool in my bag of tricks. I am a Cubase user who really doesn't like the way Cubase has been going lately. There are really some features in Reaper that have my attention. 1. Reaper can call Wavelab for audio editing!! That is something I wanted Cubase to do for a long time. 2. Display of volume and panning over the track! Something Cubase should be able to do. 3. Track name stays stationary in the track view. Again, something Cubase should have done two versions ago. One BIG drawback for me is no support for the Yamaha 01V96 mixer to act as a control surface in Reaper. There is support for my Tranzport but not for the 01V96. ANYONE know of a 01V96 map for Reaper? I think with the newest verison, 2.14, Reaper does have some very good. I like the Routing Matrix feature. No copy protection and doggle calles. Reaper is something for everyone to check out. -Gary
__________________ Cubase 4.1.3 | WaveLab Studio 6.1 | Carillon Audio Computer: XP Home SP2 Intel CPU 2.53 Ghz, 2G Ram RME Hammerfall HDSP 9652 (driver: 3.05.6) | Apogee Big Ben, Rosetta 200 | Tranzport, 2xUAD-1 | Yamaha 01V96V2 Mixer (firmware: 2.30) and REV-X Reverbs |
| | |
| | #25 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Canada eh!
Posts: 30
| Yes, I really like this program and where it is heading. For 50 bucks it can't be beat. |
| | |
| | #26 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,048
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #27 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Minneapolis MN
Posts: 1,102
| I've been playing with the mac version and its alright..... will i get rid of my HD system? no... not yet at least. |
| | |
| | #28 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,430
| If memory serves, I believe a much earlier Reaper thread, had someone mentioning that the developer liked Vegas a lot. Sony (who bought Sonic Foundry, the original developer) makes Vegas and Acid.
__________________ ~8^) "The enemy isn't liberalism or conservatism, the enemy is bullshit." Lars-Erik Nelson "Now, when there's no longer surface noise and you actually have the ability to have the most extraordinary dynamic range, people aren't using it." T-Bone Burnett "The problems that exist in the world today cannot be solved by the level of thinking that created them." Albert Einstein "I'm not black, but there's a whole lot of times I wish I could say I'm not white." Frank Zappa |
| | |
| | #29 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 340
| |
| | |
| | #30 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 340
| You can assign an external editor in preferences such that if you double click on a file it will open in another editor -- if you want or need that. Most folks find it unnecessary but I too have it set to open wave lab on the rare occasion I want to futz around with the file. |
| | |