URS API Plugins vs WAVES API Plugins - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Music computers


URS API Plugins vs WAVES API Plugins

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 27th June 2007   #1
Gear nut
 
Tony"CD"Kelly's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Location: Jamaica/Florida
Posts: 114

Thread Starter
Send a message via AIM to Tony"CD"Kelly
URS API Plugins vs WAVES API Plugins

in your Opinion, which is better & which is a better buy?
Tony"CD"Kelly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th June 2007   #2
Registered User
 
Anderson's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 472

That was fast
Anderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th June 2007   #3
Gear nut
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 79

no joke!





the waves isnt as good as their SSL series i dont think...


1 vote urs
SlingeroGuitaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th June 2007   #4
Lives for gear
 
andrewj's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: Hamburg (Wellingsbuettel), G-Many
Posts: 1,244

Send a message via AIM to andrewj
The URS pluggies are great, but...

Waves API 2500

If this one sounds as good as it looks... Ohhhhhh I am cummin!
andrewj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th June 2007   #5
Lives for gear
 
max cooper's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: tx
Posts: 8,802

Is the Waves version more expensive than the actual API version?
max cooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th June 2007   #6
Moderator
 
TonyBelmont's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: Boston,MA Providence,RI
Posts: 15,921

Quote:
Originally Posted by max cooper View Post
Is the Waves version more expensive than the actual API version?
List on the Waves API is $2000 for TDM, and $1000 for native.

The Waves product is authorized by API.

Were you talking about the URS pricing compared to the Waves? The URS is less expensive...
__________________
Tony Belmont

We Sell Gear!
High Profile Audio.....PluginDiscounts.com


I may on occasion talk about some of the products I am a dealer for in my posts.. and that's OK! I sell them because I like them. Not vice versa. It's more fun to talk about things you know and love, then things you don't.
TonyBelmont is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th June 2007   #7
Lives for gear
 
andrewj's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: Hamburg (Wellingsbuettel), G-Many
Posts: 1,244

Send a message via AIM to andrewj
but urs has no 2500 style comp!

so far i work a lot with the urs! but the waves would prbably be a hot add on!!!
andrewj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th June 2007   #8
Lives for gear
 
Sirocco's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,123

Send a message via AIM to Sirocco
if these are anywhere near as accurate as the SSL emulations i will be broke once again.
__________________


SonicSpecialists
- Drums created for, and used by, top producers across the globe.
URBAN FIRE 6 OUT NOW!!!
Check our website, and the billboard charts.
Sirocco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th June 2007   #9
Lives for gear
 
AMIEL's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: Miami, Fl
Posts: 3,615

Send a message via AIM to AMIEL Send a message via MSN to AMIEL Send a message via Yahoo to AMIEL
Wow! that waves API sounds great!

The URS CSP better be as good as this pack ...and way cheaper to be a hit as everybody expect!

Waves 7 days demo is ridiculous at least we need 15 days!
__________________
------------------


Peace.

Reuven Amiel


"There are no rules, just knowledge, good taste and experimentation"

"Music was designed to escape from reality for a moment, not to magnify our fears and problems"
AMIEL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th June 2007   #10
Moderator
 
TonyBelmont's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: Boston,MA Providence,RI
Posts: 15,921

Quote:
Originally Posted by AMIEL View Post
The URS CSP better be as good as this pack ...and way cheaper to be a hit as everybody expect!
Why does it have to be "way better" and "way cheaper"..?

It's a different kind of product... The API EQ is the URS is such a small part of the whole packages.
TonyBelmont is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th June 2007   #11
Gear addict
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 323

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyBelmont View Post
Why does it have to be "way better" and "way cheaper"..?

It's a different kind of product... The API EQ is the URS is such a small part of the whole packages.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyBelmont View Post
Why does it have to be "way better" and "way cheaper"..?

It's a different kind of product... The API EQ is the URS is such a small part of the whole packages.
Plug ins or new products have to be better always.... a plug in have to be great to sell.....and cheaper...well if API Waves is $2000 list...that I think is excessive.....The URS to be a hit have to be cheaper...or do you think have to be more expensive???
neon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th June 2007   #12
Moderator
 
TonyBelmont's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: Boston,MA Providence,RI
Posts: 15,921

Quote:
Originally Posted by neon View Post
Plug ins or new products have to be better always.... a plug in have to be great to sell.....and cheaper...well if API Waves is $2000 list...that I think is excessive.....The URS to be a hit have to be cheaper...or do you think have to be more expensive???
I was just trying to figure out why the URS have to be way better and way cheaper. As they are different products...

Waves does not make a product like the Strip Pro...
TonyBelmont is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th June 2007   #13
Lives for gear
 
peeder's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: No longer participating here.
Posts: 6,705

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyBelmont View Post
I was just trying to figure out why the URS have to be way better and way cheaper.
This is the tyranny of brand dominance. To knock off the king, you have to undercut and overdeliver.
peeder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th June 2007   #14
no ssl yet
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyBelmont View Post
I was just trying to figure out why the URS have to be way better and way cheaper. As they are different products...

Waves does not make a product like the Strip Pro...
LOL Man turn off the Gear Dealer suit, and put on the gear user thinking cap.

IF both are plugins that do EQ and compression as models of API products, they are VERY similiar products. Of course one purports to do more than the other, but if Waves has a better API emulation than URS has in its eq bundles, URS better kick ass with the channel strip emulations.

Actually if the URS drops pretty soon and it's kickass, URS could hurt waves sales by offering a low priced/ or free upgrade to its existing plugin algorithms that make them use the modeling of the Channelstrip pro in separate configurations (meaning the SSL will be the "new SSL", the API would be the "new API algorithm" and the same for the compressors.)

IF this happens, most of us who already own URS EQs etc.. would buy the Channelstrip anyway because it offers input models of tape/tube etc..
(It'd be cool if these were also offered as a plug minus the EQ/Comp. They could make it something you receive when buying the channel strip.

It would mean no WUP and great plugs with more money for URS.

And it better be reasonable because price is important and people have limited resources for this stuff. Most will buy the better API model instead of having 3 models of API, (Waves, URS, and URS in the channel strip) IF the URS is better, and it was a few bucks cheper as well, it'd be a no brainer in terms of which to buy.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th June 2007   #15
Lives for gear
 
jdjustice's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Location: US
Posts: 2,361

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewj View Post
but urs has no 2500 style comp!

so far i work a lot with the urs! but the waves would prbably be a hot add on!!!

and that 2500-style comp is my favourite thing right now about the API bundle.
it is beautiful on the 2-buss especially (as you might imagine).


Quote:
Originally Posted by SlingeroGuitaro View Post
no joke!

the waves isnt as good as their SSL series i dont think...

1 vote urs

i respectfully disagree.
the API bundle has a quite different sound as the SSL, but i think from my limited demoing of the API that it may be the best-sounding 'emulation' bundle Waves has created, at least for the music i make.

i have been using the Waves SSL buss comp since its release and i can see the API 2500 taking its place on my future mixes.


cheers.
~j.d.
__________________
Justin Justice
jdjustice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th June 2007   #16
Lives for gear
 
Sirocco's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,123

Send a message via AIM to Sirocco
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdjustice View Post
and that 2500-style comp is my favourite thing right now about the API bundle.
it is beautiful on the 2-buss especially (as you might imagine).





i respectfully disagree.
the API bundle has a quite different sound as the SSL, but i think from my limited demoing of the API that it may be the best-sounding 'emulation' bundle Waves has created, at least for the music i make.

i have been using the Waves SSL buss comp since its release and i can see the API 2500 taking its place on my future mixes.


cheers.
~j.d.
im telling myself not to try it until my financial situation is a little better
Sirocco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th June 2007   #17
Gear nut
 
Tony"CD"Kelly's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Location: Jamaica/Florida
Posts: 114

Thread Starter
Send a message via AIM to Tony"CD"Kelly
Cool

Maann, you guys are all over this thing.... So what's the verdict, which sounds better?
And what's the cost of the URS version?
__________________
Tony "CD" Kelly of K..Licious Music Group
KING OF THE DANCEHALL

www.myspace.com/tonycdkelly

http://www.tonycdkelly.com

www.twitter.com/tonycdkelly
Tony"CD"Kelly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th June 2007   #18
Gear addict
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 323

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyBelmont View Post
Why does it have to be "way better" and "way cheaper"..?

It's a different kind of product... The API EQ is the URS is such a small part of the whole packages.
Quote:
Originally Posted by no ssl yet View Post
LOL Man turn off the Gear Dealer suit, and put on the gear user thinking cap.

.
Thanks Not Yet SSL! you said it right!

Yes ...is so clear , come on Tony...u are cool but you know what I mean when a plug in is better!!! because under your concept of buying it too because is different I should buy all the plug ins that are different ...that means the whole market!!!
You do not need all the Plug in Eqs....just few..the best ones!

Here in GS all of us : Producers, engineers, Gearslutz, hobbyst , songwriters, musicians etc ...we really buy a lot of stuff from the GS sellers ....with all our crap you sellers need us to make a another sell ....so would be great if the sellers would think as NOT YET SSL stated ...with the gear user thinking cap!! so everybody would benefit from each other...you guys try to make us believe with you elocuent words that we have to pay and buy all what the manufacturers produce and say....
I think $2000 bucks for 4 plug ins is way too much!!!
neon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th June 2007   #19
Moderator
 
TonyBelmont's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: Boston,MA Providence,RI
Posts: 15,921

Quote:
Originally Posted by neon View Post
Thanks Not Yet SSL! you said it right!

Yes ...is so clear , come on Tony...u are cool but you know what I mean when a plug in is better!!! because under your concept of buying it too because is different I should buy all the plug ins that are different ...that means the whole market!!!
You do not need all the Plug in Eqs....just few..the best ones!

Here in GS all of us : Producers, engineers, Gearslutz, hobbyst , songwriters, musicians etc ...we really buy a lot of stuff from the GS sellers ....with all our crap you sellers need us to make a another sell ....so would be great if the sellers would think as NOT YET SSL stated ...with the gear user thinking cap!! so everybody would benefit from each other...you guys try to make us believe with you elocuent words that we have to pay and buy all what the manufacturers produce and say....
I think $2000 bucks for 4 plug ins is way too much!!!
First of all, his name is No SSL Yet... and I don't think he was saying exactly the same thing you are. To be clear, I was speaking about the URS Strip Pro, which is a product that hasn't been released yet. I was curious as to why the poster felt it it needed to be both cheaper and way better. Wouldn't one or the other typically be a good starting point (better and the same price, or cheaper and just as good?).

But, what it boils down to is it's a different kind of product.

On one hand, you have a bundle of API products as plugins.

On the other hand, you have a channel strip product that has emulations from lots of different products (Neve, API, SSL, etc).

There are also other things that make them different. To really compare them, you would have to take the V series, the API series and the SSL Bundle from Waves and run them through the paces with the Strip Pro.

I am thinking with a "gear user" thinking cap. I actually own all of this stuff and use it (although haven't used the API's yet). I got the API's as part of my Mercury Bundle. This was a free bonus for the Mercury Bundle owners, like me, so I don't have to make a decision between one or the other..

When it comes to native plugins, I try them out and buy the plugins I like. I suggest everyone to do the same.


EDIT: Looking back at AMIEL's original post, I completely misunderstood what he said.... He said:
Quote:
The URS CSP better be as good as this pack ...and way cheaper to be a hit as everybody expect!
I read it as the CSP needed to be way better and way cheaper... but after re-reading it, it makes a lot more sense.

So basically forget everything I said. Sorry for the confusion. That's what happens when you sleep 3 hours. You can read my pointless post above if you want.
TonyBelmont is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th June 2007   #20
Lives for gear
 
AMIEL's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: Miami, Fl
Posts: 3,615

Send a message via AIM to AMIEL Send a message via MSN to AMIEL Send a message via Yahoo to AMIEL
Do not worry Tony!!! just give me a great deal!!
AMIEL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th June 2007   #21
Lives for gear
 
Sirocco's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,123

Send a message via AIM to Sirocco
Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyBelmont View Post
First of all, his name is No SSL Yet... and I don't think he was saying exactly the same thing you are. To be clear, I was speaking about the URS Strip Pro, which is a product that hasn't been released yet. I was curious as to why the poster felt it it needed to be both cheaper and way better. Wouldn't one or the other typically be a good starting point (better and the same price, or cheaper and just as good?).

But, what it boils down to is it's a different kind of product.

On one hand, you have a bundle of API products as plugins.

On the other hand, you have a channel strip product that has emulations from lots of different products (Neve, API, SSL, etc).

There are also other things that make them different. To really compare them, you would have to take the V series, the API series and the SSL Bundle from Waves and run them through the paces with the Strip Pro.

I am thinking with a "gear user" thinking cap. I actually own all of this stuff and use it (although haven't used the API's yet). I got the API's as part of my Mercury Bundle. This was a free bonus for the Mercury Bundle owners, like me, so I don't have to make a decision between one or the other..

When it comes to native plugins, I try them out and buy the plugins I like. I suggest everyone to do the same.


EDIT: Looking back at AMIEL's original post, I completely misunderstood what he said.... He said:


I read it as the CSP needed to be way better and way cheaper... but after re-reading it, it makes a lot more sense.

So basically forget everything I said. Sorry for the confusion. That's what happens when you sleep 3 hours. You can read my pointless post above if you want.


3 Hours Of Sleep? Your a Rookie! Try 30 minutes a night for 2 summers
Sirocco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th June 2007   #22
Lives for gear
 
Chris's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: Escaped from Slipperhell
Posts: 1,697

So... Does anybody that owns one or the other have experience with both plugs? Let's hear some opinions instead of bitching about pricing.
Chris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th June 2007   #23
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Location: London
Posts: 2,049

Ive had a chance to test the Waves API against the URS for sometime!

IMHO the waves API is much better has some lovely oommph going on that the URS
does not have.In comparison the URS stuff sounds a bit plastic whilst the Waves API
just sound more real.On a side note I much prefer the way the URS is laid out and
alost their stuff supports mouse wheels.
redroom is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 28th June 2007   #24
Lives for gear
 
catfish11's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: maui, hi. USA
Posts: 668

I sold my urs a while ago, but from what I remember the waves sound nearly spot on to the "hard" api stuff,

I found the urs stuff just to easy to clip, besides

but that waves bundle is pretty scary if you like the api sound

I maybe somewhat off, but I would say the urs had the flavor, but the waves really hits it, you may not like waves, but they are making some damn good plugs

the other thing about the waves is what happens when you push the levels, they got this analog overdrive thing happening, that other plugs don't even bother with

like I said the urs was good but the clipping issue was a joke in my opinion, another big for waves on this

I also used to have an api 2500 around here, from what I remember this emulation is damn close, I was sorry I got rid of it, it was one of my "I'll do it all in the box" fazes, now i got it back......in the box!!

you really got to push these waves plugs to realize just how far they have these emulations down, you can really throttle shit w that 2500, very impresive
__________________
"Your petty insults are of no consequence." --Jp22
catfish11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th June 2007   #25
Gear nut
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Location: Manchester, England
Posts: 118

Hey don't forget liquid mix's API samples, they sound awesome IMO.
BuzzaB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th June 2007   #26
PC Moderator
 
George Necola's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Winterthur, Switzerland
Posts: 7,975

Send a message via Skype™ to George Necola
Quote:
Hey don't forget liquid mix's API samples, they sound awesome IMO.
do you have a special edition? a good sounding liquidmix unit=?

I love all the manufacturers equalyfuuck
__________________
Quote:
"recording engineers don't die, they are dragged into the grave by the shear weight of their balls."
Malcolm Chisholm
---------------------------------------------
www.georgenecola.com produce & mix it
shop.georgenecola.com
gear & fun
blog.georgenecola.com reviews & gear
soundcloud.com

twitter
George Necola is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th June 2007   #27
no ssl yet
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirocco View Post


3 Hours Of Sleep? Your a Rookie! Try 30 minutes a night for 2 summers
You must have hibernated in the Winter.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2007   #28
Lives for gear
 
indie's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: C-ville area VA
Posts: 1,618

Waves API 2500 plugin is the first plugin compressor that I love.
indie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2007   #29
Lives for gear
 
AMIEL's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: Miami, Fl
Posts: 3,615

Send a message via AIM to AMIEL Send a message via MSN to AMIEL Send a message via Yahoo to AMIEL
Quote:
Originally Posted by indie View Post
Waves API 2500 plugin is the first plugin compressor that I love.
That you love? or like?

If you love it ..its good news!!
AMIEL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2007   #30
Lives for gear
 
Sirocco's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,123

Send a message via AIM to Sirocco
Quote:
Originally Posted by no ssl yet View Post
You must have hibernated in the Winter.
you better beleive it
Sirocco is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Waves Q Clone API vs URS API Bang Music computers 84 19th June 2005 06:38 AM
So What About the URS EQ Plugins? Bang So much gear, so little time! 3 12th April 2004 07:30 PM
New URS EQ Plugins DrDeltaM So much gear, so little time! 0 9th January 2004 07:41 PM
URS API and Neve Native Plugins!!! muddy So much gear, so little time! 0 9th December 2003 09:48 PM
URS API and Neve TDM Plugins speerchucker So much gear, so little time! 7 2nd December 2003 05:57 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:53 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.