Which Processor is best for Cubase.? Core 2 Duo or a Xenon Processor (socket 775) - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Music Computers

Which Processor is best for Cubase.? Core 2 Duo or a Xenon Processor (socket 775)
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 6th June 2007   #1
Gear addict
 
frankie c's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 351

Thread Starter
Which Processor is best for Cubase.? Core 2 Duo or a Xenon Processor (socket 775)

Which Processor is best for Cubase.? Core 2 Duo or a Xenon Processor (socket 775)...

I am Trying to put together a monster DAW PC...8 Gigs Ram, ASUS Commando Motherboard (has 4 pci slots) , and 4 UAD-1 cards...

I am between a Core 2 duo processor
Newegg.com - Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 Conroe 2.4GHz 4M shared L2 Cache LGA 775 Processor - Retail

or the equivilent Xenon server processor...Intel Xeon 3060 Conroe 2.4GHz LGA 775 Processor Model BX805573060

is there a Difference 4 running Cubase? Which one you Reccomend?

I'm Stumped!!!!HELP GEARSLUTZ!!!!!
frankie c is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 6th June 2007   #2
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,490

DOH

a Core 2 Duo and 3xxx Xeons are the exact same thing!

dont be fooled by the marketing

Scott
ADK
jcschild is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 6th June 2007   #3
Gear addict
 
frankie c's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 351

Thread Starter
processors...

I Know that...

BUT , The new Mac g5's use Xenon server processors, so I thought there might be some slight difference or something...

I heard a rumor that the Xenon ones were the "best of the batch"...

Hey, it's only 12.00 more!! What could it hurt?


Thoughts???
frankie c is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 6th June 2007   #4
3 + infractions, forum membership suspended.
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 893

Quote:
Originally Posted by frankie c View Post
Hey, it's only 12.00 more!! What could it hurt?


Thoughts???
My thoughts: Anytime I am spending multiple thousands of dollars I am not arsed over 12$. Pay the extra 12$ and never look back. I take a crap at work and make 12$.
jbuehler is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2007   #5
Gear maniac
 
jdvmi's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 157

Send a message via MSN to jdvmi
"I take a crap at work and make 12$" haha, that is great!

Now back on topic... If you can hold out until July the intel Quad is going to drop to $266. The quad was going for $900 this past February and apparently the quad is really nice in a DAW.
jdvmi is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2007   #6
Gear addict
 
frankie c's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 351

Thread Starter
Quad...

Really????

The quad core will Drop ?

Will the qual work with cubase SX3?

frankie c is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2007   #7
Gear maniac
 
jdvmi's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 157

Send a message via MSN to jdvmi
Quote:
Originally Posted by frankie c View Post
Really????
Yes
Quote:
Originally Posted by frankie c View Post
The quad core will Drop ?
Yes
Quote:
Originally Posted by frankie c View Post
Will the qual work with cubase SX3?

Yes

I plan to upgrade my dual core in July and I just got it
jdvmi is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2007   #8
Lives for gear
 
ONDRAY's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 798

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbuehler View Post
My thoughts: Anytime I am spending multiple thousands of dollars I am not arsed over 12$. Pay the extra 12$ and never look back. I take a crap at work and make 12$.
you see you understand, taking i crap at work is the best. you get paid to do it.

as for the processor it's not even a question. get the xeon and pay the extra cash.
ONDRAY is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2007   #9
Gear addict
 
frankie c's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 351

Thread Starter
Xenon Quad

Well,

Now that the Quad core is comming out in July, I'm gonna wait. I will start getting all the other parts now, and finish up in July..


Thanks for the help!!! I appreciate it!!!

What do u slutz think? 8 gigs of RAM and a Quad core Should run the ol Cubase Nicely eh?

i'm such a gear junkie..
frankie c is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2007   #10
Gear maniac
 
jdvmi's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 157

Send a message via MSN to jdvmi
Quote:
Originally Posted by frankie c View Post
What do u slutz think? 8 gigs of RAM and a Quad core Should run the ol Cubase Nicely eh?
What OS do you plan on running?
jdvmi is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2007   #11
Gear addict
 
frankie c's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 351

Thread Starter
OS

U know what? I totally forgot there is a RAM limit...

I was gonna run XP pRO 32 bit , but the max is 4 GB....

Then I was thinkin of goin 64 bit XP pro, fine for Cubase and the UAD plugs, BUT , all the rest of my plugs and virtural insts are 32 bit...

SO......

I guess 32 bit XP pro and 4 Gigs of RAM and the Quad will have to do!!!!



I think thats the most painless option....(plus i'm still runnin an old MBOX)


Thoughts?
frankie c is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th January 2008   #12
Gear Head
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 44

macs ship with the xeon because you can use motherboards with more than one socket (smp)... so you could have two processors, 8 cores, if you wanted.

Xeons often seem to be ahead on bus speed, too... but on server/workstation boards.
nbasila is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 3rd January 2010   #13
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: Interstate-5, North of Grant's Pass
Posts: 701

The same old computer rules apply...

Buy just what you need now. If you buy top-of-the-line CPU, you get 15% extra MIPS/Benchmark for 300% more money and bragging rights for 60 days.

Buy with a little thrift and buy again in 18 months at the same price bracket (3 steps down from TOL), if you need to. You will get more average power over the 3 year period for same money, as well as an off-ramp if everything is going great.

This was true with 486, Pentium, P-II, P-III, etc. CPU is rarely the bottleneck. It used to be disk i/o, then it was bus multiplier, then peripheral i/o, now it's 4GB RAM limit and how fast cores talk to each other and shared L2. A balanced high-quality system that NEVER EVER crashes is the best computer.

At least you are thinking right and optimizing for your single most-demanding application.

I like a little extra silence and at least a nod to power efficiency.

Pick your price-point.

Best wishes.




Look a 2-year dead thread!
__________________
“The Gentiles are responsible for this!” — Ruth Madoff
rufus13 is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
macbook: 2.16 core duo vs 2.33 core 2 duo numrologst Music Computers 17 16th April 2007 04:27 AM
Centrino Core duo or core 2 duo linndrum9000 Music Computers 5 15th February 2007 09:28 PM
What is the fastest AMD socket 939 processor I can have.... sergioelectro Music Computers 5 21st January 2007 07:58 PM
Mulitask Audio : Dual core or bi-processor ? Zacchino High end 1 26th January 2006 11:01 PM
Is a dual 1.8ghz processor = to a 3.6ghz single processor? Hiwatt Music Computers 4 18th October 2004 07:37 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:10 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.