NEW MAC BOOK PRO'S - Page 5 - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Music computers


NEW MAC BOOK PRO'S

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 1st August 2007   #121
Lives for gear
 
composer's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 635

Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bounce View Post
I've had my 17" 2.4 for about a week and most everything is cool EXCEPT:

The built in audio card must be far inferior to the old ones somehow. On my old Powerbook G4 1.33 GHZ I could get an output latency of 4 ms in Ableton Live at a buffer of 188. On the new one, I get a latency of 11ms at the same buffer settings! That means no more internal outs for electronic drumming on this machine! Drag. That means I have to buy (MORE money) an external audio interface for live gigs.

The good news is that the latency via firewire and USB is equal to or better than my old Powerbook's internal audio (the G4 reaaaally sucked via USB or firewire in the latency dept.). Tested all this vs. my wife's 1.5 ghz running the same OS and the same version of Live. The old internal cards were WAY quicker. Silly move there Apple but I still love ya. Ya got STYLE! And skills :-)

So far really digging the 17. All my others were 15's but they were out of 15's and I needed a laptop right away when I sold mine to buy another 15!

Now I need to fatten up the RAM just to finish pimping this thing out :-)
I have heard about that! Something about the circuitry and the buzz noise, but if you go external, all is cool.

Still hoping to hear 2.2 vs 2.4 in how much more plug ins, drum machines, virtual synths you would get if you used a MBP and how the two would differ!

Are they really that strong! And compared to a 3 GZ AMD desktop? I do two things!

I. Music Songs: Vocals, drum module (sometimes two), bass, guitars
II. Lots of Orchestral work - -I would for sure need a secondary drive, is this a problem, is it fast enough to stream? I would hate to kick myself when I knew I could get a Mac Pro tower that would scream and I know that the eSata in the notebooks are faster than anything streaming USB 2.0 or FW 800 from what I've heard and that's compared to a 5400 internal MBP HD.

Thoughts? Advice? Ideas?

Thanks!
composer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd August 2007   #122
Lives for gear
 
composer's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 635

Quote:
Originally Posted by composer View Post
I have heard about that! Something about the circuitry and the buzz noise, but if you go external, all is cool.

Still hoping to hear 2.2 vs 2.4 in how much more plug ins, drum machines, virtual synths you would get if you used a MBP and how the two would differ!

Are they really that strong! And compared to a 3 GZ AMD desktop? I do two things!

I. Music Songs: Vocals, drum module (sometimes two), bass, guitars
II. Lots of Orchestral work - -I would for sure need a secondary drive, is this a problem, is it fast enough to stream? I would hate to kick myself when I knew I could get a Mac Pro tower that would scream and I know that the eSata in the notebooks are faster than anything streaming USB 2.0 or FW 800 from what I've heard and that's compared to a 5400 internal MBP HD.

Thoughts? Advice? Ideas?

Thanks!
Friendly bump in plugs = amount on 2.2 vs 2.4. Is there any website that actually benchmarked it with logic?
Thanks!
composer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd August 2007   #123
Lives for gear
 
Tibbon's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Boston/MA
Posts: 4,780

Send a message via AIM to Tibbon Send a message via Skype™ to Tibbon
I really want to get the Symphony Mobile card.... that would be so nice. My Mackie 400F is working better than every, but the Apogee would just be that much smoother.
__________________
David Fisher (aka tibbon)
What is Noise, Blog (DIY, gear, tech, etc)
Follow me on Twitter

imVOX- Voice for Gamers


WTB: Moog Theremin Signature Edition
Tibbon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2007   #124
Lives for gear
 
composer's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 635

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tibbon View Post
I really want to get the Symphony Mobile card.... that would be so nice. My Mackie 400F is working better than every, but the Apogee would just be that much smoother.
That's very good to know - I have a mackie as well. Will be doing some Video work down the road but can always get a matte large screen for that as I like the looks of the glossy. I did do a print test at a Mac Store and indeed, if you hold the picture up to a matte vs glossy, the matte is almost to the tee, but again, I like the richness of the glossy.

Also, I read the whole thread and have yet to see here or on any website how many plug-ins you can get on a 2.2 vs a 2.4 or if the difference of another 128MB (GPU) is worth the $499.00.

Any opinions or links appreciated having to do with plug in count.

Thanks!
composer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th August 2007   #125
Gear Head
 
lb9000j's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: brooklyn
Posts: 72

7200rpm, 17inch 2 gigs of ram, u will be good, applecare is a must!!! u will replace pwr supp or batt or drive within months
__________________
console addiction
lb9000j is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th August 2007   #126
Lives for gear
 
Tibbon's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Boston/MA
Posts: 4,780

Send a message via AIM to Tibbon Send a message via Skype™ to Tibbon
2.2 vs 2.4, in value

The 2.2 is a MUCH better value. I say this because the extra 128mb graphics memory doesn't really do that much at all for us here. This is a fast graphics card and really the memory doesn't indicate how fast it is. Most benchmarks give it about 5-9% faster at most on the 2.4.

A better idea for most of you (unless you want the 17" and then just get it ) is to get the 2.2 and get 4gb of RAM from Crucial. Getting it from Apple is a quick way to overpay. Crucial ram is just fine. I've used it in my last 5 macs now, and it's never given me an issue.

There's also a SATA ExpressCard/34 expansion you can get if you aren't planning on getting a Symphony Mobile.

And just as a quick benchmark, I loaded up Halflife 2 in Windows XP, and Oblivion. HL:2 runs perfectly at all options up, and Oblibion runs really well with everything 'almost' turned all the way up.
Tibbon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th September 2007   #127
Lives for gear
 
composer's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 635

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tibbon View Post
The 2.2 is a MUCH better value. I say this because the extra 128mb graphics memory doesn't really do that much at all for us here. This is a fast graphics card and really the memory doesn't indicate how fast it is. Most benchmarks give it about 5-9% faster at most on the 2.4.
From what I read at barefeats.com the 2.4 and 256 RAM could be useful for motion, but only when doing this, (according to them), if you use the MBP display and then an external monitor (1900x1440) or 1900x1200, it assigns 128 to each, so, in essence, if you use another keyboard, and a BIG monitor, you will see barely any difference. Not worth it in my opinion.

PS. Have a 2.2 15" MBP LED. bright, no whine, never hear fans, opened up logic added 12 reverbs, it stayed at 30% at about 6 and stayed at 30% after adding 6 more. Go figure.

Last edited by composer; 11th September 2007 at 09:35 AM.. Reason: adding
composer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th September 2007   #128
Lives for gear
 
Tibbon's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Boston/MA
Posts: 4,780

Send a message via AIM to Tibbon Send a message via Skype™ to Tibbon
You're right about the external monitor thing. I plugged mine into a 24" Dell display and the 128mb card was a little lacking then. I mean it worked fine, and would be fine for any DAW. Other applications, maybe less so.
Tibbon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2007   #129
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 26

Been trying to get my new 2.2 MBP running with a TC Konnekt-24d...lots of headaches on Boot Camp, but is running well on OSX.

Just want to see whether people think 7200 rpm internal is a must for audio/sample-heavy MIDI implementation. The new Hitachi 200gb 7200 rpm drive wouls surely do the trick....but the 250gb 5400 rpm offerings are tempting (Samsung, Western Digital, Hitachi, and soon Seagate) in terms of bytes/buck value. I'm seeing conflicting opinions on whether the big 5400 rpm drives will do a good enough job...in some tests on Barefeats.com, the new WD 250gb drive equals some smaller 7200 rpm drives, while it lags in others. Not quite sure which benchmarks are most relevant to audio though...

BTW, if I can't get the Konnekt 24d to work on Bootcamp (XP), are there any FW interfaces that people are having luck with on Bootcamp XP/MBP?
Monologuist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2007   #130
Lives for gear
 
Tibbon's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Boston/MA
Posts: 4,780

Send a message via AIM to Tibbon Send a message via Skype™ to Tibbon
Only get 7200rpm or higher professional drives. In a studio the MTBF is much lower and you need good drives! Seriously.

I've been buying a using the LaCie D2 series of drives for a while now. The studio I freelance at has three of them (not sure of sizes) but I have a Terabyte of them now, and I'm about to get another 500gb.

That is one area that you don't want to try to save money. Stop reading just benchmark sites. Barefeats isn't an audio site, they are making money from referrals for hardware sales. That should be obvious. They have some good info, but at the end of the day dont' cheap out just because a website tells you to. Your needs and their needs might not be the same.

My Mackie 400F is working in Bootcamp. Keep in mind that Bootcamp is in beta, and largely unsupported. You are testing software, and it isn't meant to be put into a production or professional environment.
Tibbon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2008   #131
Lives for gear
 
soundseeker's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 651

how often roughly does apple bring out a new mac book pro. wen was the last one out before the current model? id like to know f its worth waiting a half year to pgrade. or could it be 2 years????
soundseeker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th May 2008   #132
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 297

Mac Buyer's Guide: Know When to Buy Your Mac, iPod or iPhone
Dave12345 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th May 2008   #133
Lives for gear
 
blaugruen7's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: berlin
Posts: 1,887

Send a message via AIM to blaugruen7
Quote:
Originally Posted by soundseeker View Post
how often roughly does apple bring out a new mac book pro. wen was the last one out before the current model? id like to know f its worth waiting a half year to pgrade. or could it be 2 years????
RUMORS are that a new macbook pro generation with new processors and new enclosure comes sometime between june to september.
who knows...
i am saving...
blaugruen7 is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
PT HD Accel PCIe / Mac Pro's double-wide slots The MPCist Music computers 3 30th March 2007 08:57 AM
Mac book pro (core duo) vs. Mac book (core duo 2) harkonnen Music computers 11 21st January 2007 12:55 AM
#Of Mac Pro's In Nodes = The Processing Power Of Pro Tools|HD (Hardware)7 Accel? Rob G High end 12 29th August 2006 06:45 PM
Mac PRO's DivineMusic Music computers 6 23rd August 2006 01:41 PM
Non Pro's: Do you prefer gearslutting to making music? (Pro's opine if you like) magnetic So much gear, so little time! 15 11th May 2004 04:25 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:51 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.