![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear interested Joined: Feb 2004 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1
Thread Starter | Pro Tools: Upsampling From 48k to 96k Quality Loss?
Just wondering if anyone knows if there's any downside or audible quality difference to upsampling (Save Session Copy As...) a Pro Tools session from 48k to 96k? Any info would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
|
| | |
| | #2 |
| Mastering Moderator Joined: Apr 2003 Location: Always on the Run
Posts: 2,675
|
Always use "Tweakhead", the slowest SRC available in PT. You might notice that when procesing tracks with @ 24/96 many plug ins appear to sound a lot better. (but you'll need more dsp power!).
__________________ Velvet Room Mastering "Can you imagine how great the Beatles or Pink Floyd could have sounded if they had used better cables? I expect a Nobel prize to someday be awarded to an audiophile cable designer, as they clearly are way ahead of the rest of us. " - DC - |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| upsampling from 44khz to 96khz higher amplitude? | Augsy | Electronic Music Instruments & Electronic Music Production | 10 | 25th September 2011 02:08 PM |
| Pro Tools: There is way to copy or move also the Tracks+Tempo Change and Markers ?? | zak7 | So much gear, so little time! | 4 | 9th November 2009 01:44 AM |
| Workflows: From PT to Logic 8; your tips? | nikki-k | Music computers | 64 | 4th March 2008 09:01 AM |
| Is there any pro that switched from PTHD to Symphony System and MacPro? | fuoriporta | High end | 85 | 7th October 2007 04:00 PM |
| FL studio transfer to protools quality loss | optikstrange | Music computers | 3 | 18th February 2007 03:14 AM |
| |