Thonex SX test on a QuadCore with weird results... - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Music computers


Thonex SX test on a QuadCore with weird results...

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 6th April 2007   #1
Gear addict
 
UnDeFiNeD's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: Leuven, Belgium
Posts: 393

Thread Starter
Send a message via MSN to UnDeFiNeD
Exclamation Thonex SX test on a QuadCore with weird results...

Hiya computerslutz!

I used to be a systembuilder, but am now practicing mixing engineering full time.

To do all this in speed and style, I made myself a nice PC, with a Core2 Quad Q6600, 2048mb DDR2-800, asus p5w DH deluxe (975x chip) and a EMU 0404 as audio interface.
Now, because I run Cubase SX3.1, I wanted to do some benches like Fivetowers and Thonex, but the latter gave me something weird to think about.

When do you normally start to hear cracks in your audio? when u are overloading the cpu, right? Now with the thonex test I wanted to see how well it responded on 2ms ASIO latency, so I put it on 2ms, and pushed play...
CRACKLE...kkkrt...crack...crrrnnnchch.....etc..

Now while this isn't THAT abnormal, when I looked at my cpu meter, it was only at 40% bouncing agressily to about 50%, no cpu overload it seems
I opened my windows cpu meter and saw four cpu's barely touching 30%


Now my question to you is, what is then the cause of these cracks and dropouts? I was allways convinced this was cpu headroom, but I clearly still have enough of that, also the ram was at about 500mb (of the 2gb) so that wasn't it either.

screeny of the test:


Thnx!
UnDeFiNeD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th April 2007   #2
Lives for gear
 
Joined: May 2004
Location: canada
Posts: 3,998

un....
i dont know if this is true in your case...
but ive typically found that "audio hiccups" can sometimes be caused by another device takeing over the bus from the sound device/sound card.
ie..."locking it out".
assuming the 0404 is a pci card ??
the only reason i can think is another pci device impacting on the pci bus. what do u have in your pci slots other than the 0404 ??

OR another windows task takeing over. assuming the 0404 drivers are copacetic/
working properly.
by the way no mention of your hard drives.
i prefer 16mb cache hard drives.
all the best.
__________________
i'm just a dumb computer engr (ret'd)...."quantum computing is the future"
running a native software studio daw...Powertracks and Reaper on amd.
new cockney album released http://therockingbloodbrothers.blogspot.com/
my other little songs www.motagator.com/bmanning
manning1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th April 2007   #3
Gear addict
 
UnDeFiNeD's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: Leuven, Belgium
Posts: 393

Thread Starter
Send a message via MSN to UnDeFiNeD
only thing on the pci bus other than my 0404, is my UAD-1 card
I didn't mention my harddrives because normally they shouldn't have any effect since all data is loaded into ram memory.
UnDeFiNeD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th April 2007   #4
Lives for gear
 
True North's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: Richmond Hill, Ontario (Canada)
Posts: 3,213

Have you been on the Nuendo forum yet ?

Some of your problems are unique but it appears as if Steiny has some issues with properly managing multi-core. It is most noticeable on Dual - Quads. Performance scaling goes out of whack when using latencies of 64 samples or less. Differences between the Task Manager and the Steiny SPU Meter and other multi core issues have been noted in the thread below

http://www.nuendo.com/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=13317

there is some good info on the above thread - a lot of bickering BS as well but it is worth the read. The long and short of it is that Steiny admits that there is a problem with their programming and how it manages multiple cores. They are forecasting a fix in about 6 months.!!!!

You should probably try posting at the Nuendo forum as well, good luck
__________________
"In the time of chimpanzees I was a monkey" - Beck, Loser

"I do use compressors/limiters but not for controlling dynamics, I use EQ for that!" Jp22 (damn I miss him)

"Education is a progressive discovery of our own ignorance." -- Will Durant, historian (1885-1981)

"I try to get a boom out of the bass drum, in one of my albums, my CD, boom, I try to get that big boom, I could not get a big boom, I paid bucks, and could not get the boom" - Recording Expert, Tad Donley
True North is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th April 2007   #5
Lives for gear
 
Joined: May 2004
Location: canada
Posts: 3,998

un....
just a couple of comments.
in addition to TN's valuable comment.
well actually day in/out hard drive performance is rather important.
particularly ive found the larger the cache in drives the more that daw applications seem to like this fact. which is why i normally recommend drives with 16 mb cache for heavy audio work. remember...drive cache is a temporary holding area in the read/write process.

secondly the fact that you have another pci device ....not saying it is...
but it might impact the 0404 depending how much pci bandwidth is being used by the other pci device.
the pci bus is no different than a highway carrying cars in simplistic terms.
and like a highway , when traffic is low, and maneageable all is copacetic.
but as traffic increases...well...u get the idea. traffic jams can occur.
whether this is occurring in your case ...i dont know.
but at the least i would try running the 0404 by itself and see if things clear up.

me personally if i'm useing a pci sound device i dont put any other device in a pci slot to ensure the sound card has full rein over the pci bus bandwidth.


however as TN says.....mebe this is a known issue. but if were me...
out of interest i would run the 0404 by itself n see what happens.
manning1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th April 2007   #6
Lives for gear
 
clonewar's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,182

I agree with manning1, the first thing I would do is pull out the UAD card and try the test again. Were you running any UAD plugins in the test?

Also, don't rule out problems with the soundcard drivers. If you have another one (or a friend that can lend you one) it would be worth trying it out.

Lastly, read the thread the True North suggested. It is true that Cubendo has an issue with multi cores, but from what I've gathered on the forums it really effects dual quads. I know there are people on the Cubase forum running the Core 2 Quad with success.
clonewar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th April 2007   #7
Lives for gear
 
Animus's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Location: Durham, NC USA
Posts: 8,456

Send a message via AIM to Animus
I was getting the same symptoms at lower latencies with the same motherboard. THere was a setting in the Bios I "thought" would make things better, where you can switch the buss priority to PCI --> PCIExpress and vice versa. I switched it to PCI as I run UADs and Powercore in a Magma and a Multiface. Later when going to lower latencies I got these crackles I had never gotten before and it took a little troubleshooting until I remembered I had made that change in the Bios. I set it back to the default of Pci Express priority and all was fine again. Weird.
Animus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th April 2007   #8
Gear addict
 
UnDeFiNeD's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: Leuven, Belgium
Posts: 393

Thread Starter
Send a message via MSN to UnDeFiNeD
Quote:
Were you running any UAD plugins in the test?
Nope, it's a standardized Cubendo benchmark I got from ADK proaudio, called "thonex test"
It only uses default, native plugins so I would be amased if my UAD has anything to do with it.

Quote:
Also, don't rule out problems with the soundcard drivers. If you have another one (or a friend that can lend you one) it would be worth trying it out.
I also have an digi mbox2 hanging on USB (as a PT dongle ), I'll see what she does, but the main reason I bought the 0404 was because it's PCI and therefore has a lot less latency than a USB/FW interface like the Mbox.

It's worth nothing that when I tried the test at the 3ms setting, everything was running just fine, so it's not that I'm desperate for 1ms less, I just want to find out why he suddenly craps out like that at 2ms while the cpu's are barely working.
UnDeFiNeD is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
digidesign 192IO vs Prism ADA8 96 test results lawrence_o So much gear, so little time! 4 3rd November 2009 01:39 AM
Plextools Test Results, HELP! bcgood Mastering forum 16 14th September 2006 06:53 PM
Chicago test results...download. robocop So much gear, so little time! 0 20th November 2005 04:08 PM
hi-end a/c pwr cords ABX blind test results Fleaman High end 98 11th February 2005 04:46 AM
Cable test results.... djui5 High end 18 10th June 2004 11:00 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:46 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.