![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 792
Thread Starter | gain structure, headroom, on digital domain
hello, i've read "mixing with your mind" of mike stervrou, i like it!!! i've discuss a lot with a my friend about have a "analog headroom" on digital domain. but i can't find a way. our methods is to: play each tracks in solo mode with fader at max +6db put a vu-meter like psp vintage meter on master (setting up -18dbfs or -14dbfs for reference level, and 300ms of release time) calibrate the gain of each tracks to read +2 on vu meter but i work with samples library often recorded at 0dbfs or 0.1dbfs of peak. often, after i've calibrate each gain tracks, i clip the master too.. of 1 or 2 db, or sometimes of some point 0.3, 0.5 the better results are -1.5, -2 dbfs on master, but i think that with this techniques i have to read something like -6 or -3/4 on master peak meter. my friend says that the trick is to have track peak value at max -6 and that is important to have max -6db of gain reduction (gain correction) but i always have, for example, bd at -5 (and it's ok), snare on -9, hh on -10db of gain correction/reduction. but i can't to have enough headroom on master track. why? which are your methods to prevent clips and have a good headroom for each tracks? and for master track? thanks and sorry for my english p.s. yes after all +6 fader in solo mode, i align all at 0 )
|
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 792
Thread Starter |
hey thanks to anyone who can help me in this great problem that i have. the problem i think is specially for fast transients (maybe i have to put the release time to 30ms (min value)) for hh, sn. or maybe the problems is for samples library that are all at 0dbfs or -0.1dbfs.. do you have some tricks, helps, for that? thaaaaaanks really to all!! |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 526
|
-18 db in Pro Tools = 0 VU on your Vintage Meter.
|
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 792
Thread Starter |
yes, you have understand anything of that i wrote, but i think is a my fault, my bad english.. (-18 in protools or in all the other software, is 0 on VU if VU reference level is -18, if is -14, is not 0 on VU ![]() anyone have understand what i wrote? |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 526
| Umm, well, don't calibrate to -14; always use -18. Also, I don't understand why you set the gain of each track to +2; doesn't it fall into place for you if you just use the -18/0VU calibration? Are you saying you get clipping in the mix bus if you don't calibrate this way?
|
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 792
Thread Starter | Quote:
ipse dixit ![]() no i say that i clipping in the mix bus also if i use the -18 calibration. note that i use a lot of samples library (and unfortunatly are all recorded at 0dbfs or -0.1dbfs) and note that in some song i use 4 or 5 or more percussive loops to make the base.. like drum 'n bass strange effect, but i clip also if i don't use too much loop, or i'm however around -1.5 or -2 on mix bus, and i think that i have to be around -6 or -3/4db. do you think that i have to use 0 and not +2 on vu-meter? another important question: if i have to reduce gain of more than 6db on some tracks, is a problem? why some people says that is a problem? thanks really!! your help is very important for me. | |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 526
| Quote:
to get the samples peaking at no more than -18; from there it's a matter of how you structure the mix as a whole. I don't think it's a problem to reduce gain more than 6db, because if the samples are at 0dbfs, they're too hot to use in a track. | |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2005 Location: Texas
Posts: 1,955
|
I don't understand why you don't just pull the fader down... I also don't understand where you won't dump more than 6db of the fader.... It's been a while since i have done a mix in the box... So I don't quite remember my processes... But I track with a -12dbfs reference level... I consistently track with peaks hitting 0 and I have never had a problem But as for controlling levels in the box, just use the faders... If you have to pull it down 12db... Then that's what you have to do.. I hope i am understanding your issue |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 792
Thread Starter |
yes, you are right, but i like to use this technique because if i calibrate each tracks in this way, thats helps me to mix with all tracks in play and hear where a track needs more comp or more high or low, in a global way, in a global depending relationships way (maybe my english is too bad to be understood...) well than for you if i put down more than 6 db, maybe 12 or maybe 18 (you say -18 db on each tracks? is this your reference level Radiomoo?) i can forget all this trouble and i can let's my hands mix.. ![]() but i think that the fear of -6db is something real, i heard about that from famous audio engineering (but now i can't remember the names but for me is more a fear than something i can hearwell thanks to all!!! reallY!!! |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 435
|
try the K-system (bob katz) you wil never clip the 2bus. |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 526
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 792
Thread Starter |
ok, yes i have see the thread, tonight i read all. than you think that there isn't any degradation under -6db for me is well, i just looking for a way to improve my mix ![]() bye!!! |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 903
|
ipse dixit ![]() What the....? |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 792
Thread Starter |
ehm sorry what do you mean? you want to know what means ipse dixit? means something like "i do as you said" its a citation
|
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 526
| Quote:
Latin for "he himself said it." The term labels something that is asserted but unproved. http://www.nolo.com/definition.cfm/T...2BA64/alpha/I/ | |
| | |
| | #16 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
I am using the Apogee Duet, and there is a mixer that has an input level, as well as a "from software" level. Is one of these the fader that you speak of? Does anyone know? I really, really want to avoid clipping from this point forward, but have no understanding of how to set the fader so that you cannot record above -12db. Also, does this apply to any instrument you are recording (voice, bass, guitar, etc.)? Any and all help would be beyond appreciated. Again, I am using Pro Tools 9 and the Apogee Duet, for reference. | |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| protools gain structure | Ken Breezy | Music computers | 8 | 15th March 2010 03:39 AM |
| Help me with my Gain Structure to Nuendo | ludwigvanlee | Music computers | 13 | 19th May 2006 09:03 PM |
| PT Gain structure and calibration. | Wiggy Neve Slut | Q&A with Michael H. Brauer | 1 | 21st September 2005 01:22 PM |
| DJ Mixing - Gain structure | explorer | So much gear, so little time! | 0 | 19th August 2005 10:39 AM |
| 1272 Gain Structure Help | Mellontron | Geekslutz forum | 3 | 19th April 2004 12:38 AM |
| |