gain structure, headroom, on digital domain - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Music computers


gain structure, headroom, on digital domain

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 4th March 2007   #1
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 792

Thread Starter
gain structure, headroom, on digital domain

hello, i've read "mixing with your mind" of mike stervrou, i like it!!! i've discuss a lot with a my friend about have a "analog headroom" on digital domain. but i can't find a way.

our methods is to:

play each tracks in solo mode with fader at max +6db

put a vu-meter like psp vintage meter on master (setting up -18dbfs or -14dbfs for reference level, and 300ms of release time)

calibrate the gain of each tracks to read +2 on vu meter


but i work with samples library often recorded at 0dbfs or 0.1dbfs of peak.
often, after i've calibrate each gain tracks, i clip the master too.. of 1 or 2 db, or sometimes of some point 0.3, 0.5

the better results are -1.5, -2 dbfs on master, but i think that with this techniques i have to read something like -6 or -3/4 on master peak meter.

my friend says that the trick is to have track peak value at max -6 and that is important to have max -6db of gain reduction (gain correction) but i always have, for example, bd at -5 (and it's ok), snare on -9, hh on -10db of gain correction/reduction. but i can't to have enough headroom on master track.

why? which are your methods to prevent clips and have a good headroom for each tracks? and for master track?

thanks and sorry for my english

p.s. yes after all +6 fader in solo mode, i align all at 0 )
mattianlaseppia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2007   #2
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 792

Thread Starter
hey thanks to anyone who can help me in this great problem that i have.
the problem i think is specially for fast transients (maybe i have to put the release time to 30ms (min value)) for hh, sn. or maybe the problems is for samples library that are all at 0dbfs or -0.1dbfs..

do you have some tricks, helps, for that?

thaaaaaanks really to all!!
mattianlaseppia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2007   #3
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 526

-18 db in Pro Tools = 0 VU on your Vintage Meter.
RadioMoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2007   #4
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 792

Thread Starter
yes, you have understand anything of that i wrote, but i think is a my fault, my bad english..

(-18 in protools or in all the other software, is 0 on VU if VU reference level is -18, if is -14, is not 0 on VU

anyone have understand what i wrote?
mattianlaseppia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2007   #5
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 526

Quote:
Originally Posted by mattianlaseppia View Post
yes, you have understand anything of that i wrote, but i think is a my fault, my bad english..

(-18 in protools or in all the other software, is 0 on VU if VU reference level is -18, if is -14, is not 0 on VU

anyone have understand what i wrote?
Umm, well, don't calibrate to -14; always use -18. Also, I don't understand why you set the gain of each track to +2; doesn't it fall into place for you if you just use the -18/0VU calibration? Are you saying you get clipping in the mix bus if you don't calibrate this way?
RadioMoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2007   #6
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 792

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by RadioMoo View Post
Umm, well, don't calibrate to -14; always use -18. Also, I don't understand why you set the gain of each track to +2; doesn't it fall into place for you if you just use the -18/0VU calibration? Are you saying you get clipping in the mix bus if you don't calibrate this way?
mike stevrou use +2 db calibration.. i don't know ipse dixit

no i say that i clipping in the mix bus also if i use the -18 calibration.
note that i use a lot of samples library (and unfortunatly are all recorded at 0dbfs or -0.1dbfs) and note that in some song i use 4 or 5 or more percussive loops to make the base.. like drum 'n bass strange effect, but i clip also if i don't use too much loop, or i'm however around -1.5 or -2 on mix bus, and i think that i have to be around -6 or -3/4db.

do you think that i have to use 0 and not +2 on vu-meter?

another important question: if i have to reduce gain of more than 6db on some tracks, is a problem? why some people says that is a problem?

thanks really!! your help is very important for me.
mattianlaseppia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2007   #7
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 526

Quote:
Originally Posted by mattianlaseppia View Post
if i have to reduce gain of more than 6db on some tracks, is a problem? why some people says that is a problem?
Well, I'm a little out of my league here, but my gut tells me to use the Gain plug in
to get the samples peaking at no more than -18; from there it's a matter of how you structure the mix as a whole. I don't think it's a problem to reduce gain more than 6db, because if the samples are at 0dbfs, they're too hot to use in a track.
RadioMoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2007   #8
Lives for gear
 
numrologst's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,955

I don't understand why you don't just pull the fader down... I also don't understand where you won't dump more than 6db of the fader....

It's been a while since i have done a mix in the box... So I don't quite remember my processes...

But I track with a -12dbfs reference level... I consistently track with peaks hitting 0 and I have never had a problem

But as for controlling levels in the box, just use the faders... If you have to pull it down 12db... Then that's what you have to do..

I hope i am understanding your issue
numrologst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th March 2007   #9
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 792

Thread Starter
yes, you are right, but i like to use this technique because if i calibrate each tracks in this way, thats helps me to mix with all tracks in play and hear where a track needs more comp or more high or low, in a global way, in a global depending relationships way (maybe my english is too bad to be understood...)

well than for you if i put down more than 6 db, maybe 12 or maybe 18 (you say -18 db on each tracks? is this your reference level Radiomoo?) i can forget all this trouble and i can let's my hands mix..

but i think that the fear of -6db is something real, i heard about that from famous audio engineering (but now i can't remember the names but for me is more a fear than something i can hear

well thanks to all!!! reallY!!!
mattianlaseppia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th March 2007   #10
Gear addict
 
Ravian's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 435

Cool

try the K-system (bob katz)

you wil never clip the 2bus.
Ravian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th March 2007   #11
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 526

Quote:
Originally Posted by mattianlaseppia View Post
yes, you are right, but i like to use this technique because if i calibrate each tracks in this way, thats helps me to mix with all tracks in play and hear where a track needs more comp or more high or low, in a global way, in a global depending relationships way (maybe my english is too bad to be understood...)

well than for you if i put down more than 6 db, maybe 12 or maybe 18 (you say -18 db on each tracks? is this your reference level Radiomoo?) i can forget all this trouble and i can let's my hands mix..

but i think that the fear of -6db is something real, i heard about that from famous audio engineering (but now i can't remember the names but for me is more a fear than something i can hear

well thanks to all!!! reallY!!!
Yes, I use -18=0VU. The engineer I think you mean is Paul Frindel. Don't fear less than -6 in a track - fear unwanted clipping. If you're recording at 24 bits, your finished product will have the resolution and the openness you want. There's a really lo-o-o-n-n-ng thread where this is discussed at length; the actual meat of the discussion starts on page four, which is here - scroll down to Paul Frindle's post.
RadioMoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th March 2007   #12
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 792

Thread Starter
ok, yes i have see the thread, tonight i read all.
than you think that there isn't any degradation under -6db

for me is well, i just looking for a way to improve my mix

bye!!!
mattianlaseppia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th March 2007   #13
Lives for gear
 
bobwarren's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 903

ipse dixit


What the....?
bobwarren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th March 2007   #14
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 792

Thread Starter
ehm sorry what do you mean? you want to know what means ipse dixit? means something like "i do as you said" its a citation
mattianlaseppia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th March 2007   #15
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 526

Quote:
Originally Posted by mattianlaseppia View Post
ehm sorry what do you mean? you want to know what means ipse dixit? means something like "i do as you said" its a citation
ipse dixit

Latin for "he himself said it." The term labels something that is asserted but unproved.

http://www.nolo.com/definition.cfm/T...2BA64/alpha/I/
RadioMoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th December 2010   #16
Lives for gear
 
hereticskeptic's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,097

Quote:
Originally Posted by numrologst View Post
I don't understand why you don't just pull the fader down... I also don't understand where you won't dump more than 6db of the fader....

It's been a while since i have done a mix in the box... So I don't quite remember my processes...

But I track with a -12dbfs reference level... I consistently track with peaks hitting 0 and I have never had a problem

But as for controlling levels in the box, just use the faders... If you have to pull it down 12db... Then that's what you have to do..

I hope i am understanding your issue
I know this is a really old post, but I think you were addressing my primary concern with recording in Pro Tools.

I am using the Apogee Duet, and there is a mixer that has an input level, as well as a "from software" level. Is one of these the fader that you speak of? Does anyone know?

I really, really want to avoid clipping from this point forward, but have no understanding of how to set the fader so that you cannot record above -12db. Also, does this apply to any instrument you are recording (voice, bass, guitar, etc.)? Any and all help would be beyond appreciated. Again, I am using Pro Tools 9 and the Apogee Duet, for reference.
hereticskeptic is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
protools gain structure Ken Breezy Music computers 8 15th March 2010 03:39 AM
Help me with my Gain Structure to Nuendo ludwigvanlee Music computers 13 19th May 2006 09:03 PM
PT Gain structure and calibration. Wiggy Neve Slut Q&A with Michael H. Brauer 1 21st September 2005 01:22 PM
DJ Mixing - Gain structure explorer So much gear, so little time! 0 19th August 2005 10:39 AM
1272 Gain Structure Help Mellontron Geekslutz forum 3 19th April 2004 12:38 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:42 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.