![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Problems with Logic Bounced Aif Files in other Apps! | busytbp | Music computers | 6 | 24th June 2006 09:05 AM |
| Disappearing bounced files in PT LE | penguin | Music computers | 4 | 24th January 2006 02:37 PM |
| can "Dualdisc" save Surround (& record companies)? | Timsplace | High end | 11 | 4th May 2005 04:20 AM |
| new DFHS announced "Custom & Vintage" from Toontrack | captain54 | Music computers | 18 | 7th March 2005 09:31 AM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 226
| What does DFHS C&V save when bounced? Does it save the files (after bouncing) at 44.1/24 regardless of the recording environment? I'm recording in sonar at 96k/24 bit, so I wanted to see what happens to the files? If they are saved to 44.1/24, I guess when I import, sonar upsamples them to 96... If that's the case, do you think it's better to work at the native sample rate of 44.1/24 in sonar as to not cause any errors while upsampling? Please let me know. Thanks. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Sweden
Posts: 198
| In the bounce section of C&V there's a choice of 44.1/16 or 44.1/24 /Matt
__________________ 15K Studios, SWE |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 226
| So when I take the files into Sonar, Sonar will upsample to 96 automatically? |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Cincinnati Ohio
Posts: 365
| DP automatically matches the sample rate, don't know about Sonar....I'm sure it does. halcyo |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 226
| I'm pretty sure now that it saves at 44.1/24. I think at this point, my choices are software based upsample (Sonar) or hardware based (Apogee rosetta). I'm leaning towards the Rosetta, but not sure. Maz |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 226
| Can anyone comment or have any experience about if it would be better to let Sonar handle the DFHS upsampling from 44.1 to 96, or if I should let my appogee do it. Thanks. Maz |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |