![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2005 Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,661
Thread Starter | Delay Compensation in Logic Pro 7 for Outboard: How Do YOU do it it?
Okay, this is a sister thread to my much more irrational and psychotic "I wish apple would die" thread. The long and the short of it is, I'm having a hell of a time with Logic and I'm thinking of switching away from it unless someone can help me find a solution to this problem. Problem is simple: I want to have the freedom to send a track out from Logic, through some outboard, back in through my converters and record the result on a new track. That new track can then be blended with the original for parallell compression, or used entirely on it's own. Whatever I see fit. The problem is that there is of course delay introduced when it hits the converters, and so it sounds horribly phasey when played back along with the original material. Cubase has auto-delay compensation as it's solution for such issues. I know Logic does not. So what are you Logic users doing to make use of your outboard in the above scenario? I tried using the "latency fixer" third party plugin on the newly created track, but it seems to delay the track further, rather than pull it back, which is the function I'm looking for. And even if I could pull it back, I'm not sure if the delay amount would be the same every time or not. Maybe it would? I'm praying to the powers that be that there's a solution here. I just don't know if I have the energy to switch from Logic at this point. But I will, if there's really no other options. Thanks for any further insight into this one.
__________________ -Matthew |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Moderator Joined: Sep 2003 Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,347
|
__________________ Mathijs Indesteege aka Mathew Lane mixing - mastering - audio restoration - plugins http://www.mathewlane.com DrMS. Focus on your stereo field. - NEW v3.2 OUT NOW! DrMS spatial processor - native RTAS/AU/VST plugin ยป Digital Audio Product Support Joystick Audio - Benelux High End Distributor http://www.joystick.be |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2005 Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,661
Thread Starter |
DrDelta -- this is one interesting thing I'd not come across yet -- you put the latency fixer plug on the track you're sending OUT to outboard. I was putting it on the newly created track that was recorded in. Either way thougrh, does that plugin not ADD delay, not remove it? Aren't we trying to pull tracks BACK in time, not more forward? Am I losing my mind? And you just remove the I/O and latency fixer plugs from that channel once the recording of the new material is complete? I take it you'd have to, or the original material would effecitvely remain delayed.... Thanks for any insight my good man. |
| | |
| | #4 | ||
| Moderator Joined: Sep 2003 Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,347
| Quote:
To have Logic compensate, latency compensation must be on of course in the Logic preferences. I prefer the 'all' setting there, as I also use I/O loops on busses. Quote:
I solo the track, bounce it realtime. Afterwards, remove the I/O loop and Latency Fixer and simply replace the audio on that track by the bounced file. For parallel compression, I normally use a send from the main ('unprocessed') track to a bus. On that bus (or on an aux track with that bus as input, depending on your way of working), I insert the I/O loop and the Latency Fixer. Now if you want to print only the parallel track: solo the original track and the aux/bus, but make sure the output of the main ('unprocessed') track isn't routed to the main output on which you bounce. This way, you'll end up with a bounce of only the parallel track. Afterwards, reassign the output of the main track, and add the parallel bounced file on a new track. Nowadays, I hardly ever print outboard gear, I always leave it running realtime (8 analog I/O at once). Works perfect | ||
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear |
Hi, The best way to manually compensate for the latency is to play back the track(s) in Logic which were recorded with the outboard, and at the same time, play back the original track(s) (before they were sent to your outboard gear). Then, while monitoring both sets of tracks, adjust Logic's delay parameter for the newly recorded track(s) until you hear them all sync up with the most amount of phase cancellation. You can then make note of the delay setting you've just calculated for the external routing setup of that specific outboard gear you used. That way, you only have to do it once for every routing scheme, and you'll know all the settings for your external gear whenever you record through them again. By the way, if you use percussion tracks or any source material which has a fast attack when you first go to discover your various gear's latency, it is of course much easier and more precise. Hope this helps. |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Moderator Joined: Sep 2003 Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,347
|
You need to calculate/search this delay value only once per convertor combo as analog outboardgear itself has no latency. It's the convertor (DA + AD) latency you need to compensate. Since most people work with the same kind of DA and AD convertors on all their I/O, you'd only have to measure this once |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2005 Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,661
Thread Starter |
Holy Shit DrDelta, I got it working. Much simpler than the bussing, I'm just routing out to the outboard, record enabling a new "return" audio track, recording back onto it and then putting the latency fixer on that track. Done like dinner. Thanks for your help man, that really buys me some time while I wait for Apple to get their shit straight!! |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| Moderator Joined: Sep 2003 Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,347
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2003 Location: berlin
Posts: 542
|
do someone know if there is a plug like latency fixer working in logic 5.5 mac (vst)...? sorry, i know i am still in the logic - stoneage... |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 435
| |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2003 Location: berlin
Posts: 542
| Quote:
i know that! the reason i ask is: its not possible to dial in a negative delay, so i have to delay all other tracks exept the one which was going OTB...just thought there may be a easier way.... | |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| Gear addict Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 435
| Quote:
(in the upper left corner of the screen)it hass negative and positive delay. like maybe when you want to go outboard. for a test you have a hi-hat track and you copy that ,so track: 1 hi-hat track 2: copy hi-hat then you have to put the i/o plug on track 2 that wil go to your hardware and back (no prosessing on the hardware side comp maybe 1:1) than track 2 has a delay. right so you go to the upper left corner (still track 2)and you dail in a positive delay. on the delay section (it can be samples or ms) you tune it until the hi-hats match.(you could even flip the phase on 1 hi-hat,so it disapears when you got it right(pan hard L &R ). so now you got a positive value you can dail in when you are using hardware. it only compensates for the converters. hope this wil help. | |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Pro Tools HD automatic delay compensation - a joke? | jacko | Music computers | 5 | 9th December 2006 06:04 PM |
| Logic Pro 7 Delay Compensation? | chrisrulesmore | Music computers | 17 | 21st April 2006 03:41 AM |
| plug for PINGING OUTBOARD PLUG IN DELAY COMPENSATION? | Durv | Music computers | 1 | 18th July 2005 12:09 AM |
| Logic 7.1 "Full Plugin Delay Compensation" - what a mess! | Trailerman | Music computers | 20 | 17th May 2005 12:20 PM |
| Does Logic 6.x have Auto Delay Compensation? | jeronimo | Music computers | 2 | 23rd July 2003 06:44 PM |
| |