![]() | All Advertisers |
| | #1 |
| PC Moderator | Waves APA32 accelator platform Question: - stability? - works good with native pluggos? - comments maybe price you have paid. cheers |
| | |
| | #2 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Richmond Hill, Ontario (Canada)
Posts: 3,203
| Quote:
I have the 44 and honestly I feel as if it was a waste of money after I built my new rig almost a year ago. I only use it for the convolution reverb (Ir1) and I don't really even need it for that. The other pain in the ass is that it starts to act funky when you change latencies which I will do dpending on whether I am mixing or tracking. I am planning on selling it, but I don't think I would get more than half of what I paid. Cheers!
__________________ "In the time of chimpanzees I was a monkey" - Beck, Loser "I do use compressors/limiters but not for controlling dynamics, I use EQ for that!" Jp22 (damn I miss him) "Education is a progressive discovery of our own ignorance." -- Will Durant, historian (1885-1981) "I try to get a boom out of the bass drum, in one of my albums, my CD, boom, I try to get that big boom, I could not get a big boom, I paid bucks, and could not get the boom" - Recording Expert, Tad Donley | |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Germany
Posts: 566
| i don't own one but i know the stats of how many plugins you can run with it. imho it's not worth it. if you build a new system for the same money you get way more instances (if you're a pc user). |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Canuk
Posts: 5,163
| If your using any other Waves PI besides the APA only plug-ins the installion is not smooth. Other than than the APA stuff is very stable. I hate external pwered plug-ins like APA, Duende, and Liquid Mix. After using all 3 for several months. They are all useless for tracking, I tend to build mixes as I track so the latentcy is out of hand and it's a pain to keep turning ADC off and on. I think they are great when your at the end of your mix and your running out of DSP. But on my 7 card Accel rig that usually never happens. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Atlanta
Posts: 576
| I've owned one for about a year. Whoever said it wasn't useful for tracking was dead-on because you have to set the buffer size to high in the DAW in order to use the APA. It's also really loud, which isn't a problem for me because I have a machine room. However, it takes a load off the CPU during mixdown. In a typical mix for me it runs reverbs and EQ (Q-Clone). They've recently cut the price in half, BTW, and I believe it still comes with IR-L and Q-Clone. |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Richmond Hill, Ontario (Canada)
Posts: 3,203
| Quote:
I tend to build mixes as well and yes any externally powered plug in device will pretty much screw up your ability to use them during tracking. When I start to get to a point where I am building the mix using my UAD's or APA or whatever I will usually do a stereo mix for vocal OD's and Gtr OD's (whatever) and just build the OD on the stereo mix. I can plunk the final takes into my real mix and I don't have to worry about which plugins I am using. It takes a little longer but it opens more options as well. | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| PC Moderator | thanx guys! decisions: don't buy it George ![]() |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Richmond Hill, Ontario (Canada)
Posts: 3,203
| Good choice |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,171
| I'm still upset that the SSL plugs have not been ported to the APA netshell format. Come to think of it, nothing has for the last year.
__________________ " the wrist of the listener will always turn up the volume for you more effectively than any brick wall compression ever could." -- Stav from Mixing With Your Mind |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear | does anyone know if the bundeled IR-1 and Q-Clone plugins that come with the APAs are locked to the aPA thing or do they also come in native versions? thinking about getting the APA32, keeping the plugins and selling the hardware..... cheers, pat |
| | |
| | #11 |
| PC Moderator | IR-1 is native.. |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Lives for gear | George, thanks - do you mean there is a native version of the IR1 or that the APA32 comes with the native version aND the APA version of the plugin? In other words, can I install the APA version and then run it natively without having the APA hardware connected? Thanks again, Pat |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| PC Moderator | autch.. dont know.. I didnt bought this APA thing.. I just know that a friend runs IR-1 ![]()
__________________ Quote:
www.georgenecola.com produce & mix it shop.georgenecola.com gear & fun blog.georgenecola.com reviews & gear soundcloud.com | |
| | |
| | #14 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,171
| Quote:
Especially at higher sample rates and with multiple instances, the IR-L is such a CPU hog, running it on the APA is not a bad idea. Something to consider. | |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Richmond Hill, Ontario (Canada)
Posts: 3,203
| FWIW, I was speaking with a Waves dealer not too long ago and apparently the plan is to have ALL of their plugs to be made compatible with the APA series in their next update This is not Waves confirmed but I beleived my source. |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,171
| Boy, would that be welcome. I know Waves has reformed their WUP and all that, but for someone like me on the PC Win XP platform, the last year+ of paying WUP has yielded no fruit. |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Canuk
Posts: 5,163
| That's funny I heard that rumor as well hmmm |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Gear interested | APA32 You cannot track with it. Not sure why anyone would be surprised by this. Managing changes to its Netshell latency is easy but a big pain if your in a dynamic environment. Best used in a static environment like post production etc. I've found my APA32 to be very reliable. Using it for 6 stereo instances of IR-1. I mix out to stems and need at least 4 high quality reverbs running, one for each stem. This saves me from running an hour long show 4 times using solo / mute to create my stems. If waves were to include netshell support for more pluggins I would buy several more bundles and APA32's I have mine setup in a machine room. Impossible to use in the same room. They have 4 high speed fans in it spinning like crazy = very loud. |
| | |
| | #19 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
What about the impulses of IR-L and IR-1? Do they have real rooms like altiverb (studio recording rooms, drumrooms etc. - not just halls and cathedrals) as well? That is mainly what I am looking for! Cheers, Pat | |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| anyone using SAW studio as a remote recording platform? | cajonezzz | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 3 | 16th April 2006 06:06 AM |
| Looking For Advice on Which Platform To Select | Sproto | So much gear, so little time! | 27 | 28th March 2006 03:37 PM |
| Help choosing a platform? | enharmonic | Music computers | 3 | 12th June 2005 02:58 AM |
| How to create a cross platform Enhanced CD? | Gerax | Music computers | 0 | 26th October 2004 08:22 PM |
| Need a new computer platform... what would you pick? | BattleAngel | High end | 23 | 13th February 2004 05:18 AM |
| |