URS authentic guis no more!? - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > News > The Moan Zone


URS authentic guis no more!?

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 31st January 2008   #1
Lives for gear
 
rhythminmind's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,076

Thread Starter
Question URS authentic guis no more!?

Whats up with this? Not a huge deal for me but WTF? Check it out
URS Individual plug-ins

Functionally it's better but i liked them..
__________________
"Any experiment of interest in life will be carried out at your own expense."
rhythminmind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2008   #2
Lives for gear
 
rhythminmind's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,076

Thread Starter
Sad thing is this will hurt URS. They will lose the spontaneous buying gearsult that wants the cool looking plugin. Waves business just increased. I don't mind tho i like using the "unused tools" I just don't want to see less $ for URS.
Less $ means less support/development = less product improvement.

I sold my standalone URS EQ's i use the URS CSP now So can someone confirm this for me? Maybe you can select what gui you want?
rhythminmind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2008   #3
Lives for gear
 
SkunkWorks's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: Edmonton, AB Canada
Posts: 1,016

Not sure I understand what you're refering to.
SkunkWorks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2008   #4
Lives for gear
 
rhythminmind's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,076

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkunkWorks View Post
Not sure I understand what you're refering to.
The EQ's dont have the authentic gui.

example new Guis




Original guis

rhythminmind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2008   #5
Gear nut
 
Third Eye's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: New Mexico USA
Posts: 138

Looks like the N-Series, S-Series and the A-Series Eq's all have the MIX EQ GUI style. The A-10 and N-12 are the same. The fultech looks the same. The Classic Compressors still look the same. Weird
Third Eye is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2008   #6
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 845

WTF are you talking about? Who buy's a plugin for the "cool GUI" And just how does a ****** like this pay for the expensive "cool GUI" plugin. Having brain damage and/or being completely insane doesn't allow many luxuries.
SFTPH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2008   #7
Lives for gear
 
rhythminmind's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,076

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFTPH View Post
WTF are you talking about? Who buy's a plugin for the "cool GUI" And just how does a ****** like this pay for the expensive "cool GUI" plugin. Having brain damage and/or being completely insane doesn't allow many luxuries.
The typical consumer will by a pretty gui over the not. Like i said i it's not a big deal to me. I just want to know why. Was is a lawsuit? Did a company bitch?

If i deigned a great EQ with a bland interface & a so so EQ with a sleak gui, I tell you the ******ation of the masses would buy the cooler looking one. It's like that for almost any product. How many shitty guitars do you see out there with flames on them. Cars are a great example as well. Yes the smart will do otherwise.
But humanity and smart is not the norm.
& yes i prefer the authentic gui.
rhythminmind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2008   #8
Lives for gear
 
elambo's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: Up here
Posts: 6,181

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhythminmind View Post
Sad thing is this will hurt URS. They will lose the spontaneous buying gearsult that wants the cool looking plugin. Waves business just increased. I don't mind tho i like using the "unused tools" I just don't want to see less $ for URS.
Less $ means less support/development = less product improvement.

I sold my standalone URS EQ's i use the URS CSP now So can someone confirm this for me? Maybe you can select what gui you want?
OMG!
elambo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2008   #9
Tui
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,430

I have to agree, an appealing GUI adds to the desirability of a plug-in. I really couldn't stand the all-black design of the CSP, one of the reasons I sold it on (but not the only reason). On the other hand, I really like the GUIs of the FullTec and BLT EQs - every time I bring them up, they make me smile. Their appearance is simple, yet aesthetically pleasing.
Tui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2008   #10
Gear addict
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 476

Personally when using AUDIO plug ins I tend to use my EARS!

This fascination with hardware looking plug ins is just ridiculous

If you or anyone else buy audio products based on appearance then imho you have problems that no one can solve.

This thread is just another example of whats wrong with the current buying market.

Crazy Crazy Crazy.
GGreen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2008   #11
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 190

Smile

This may sound crazy but the plugins sound better now they have the new GUIs!!
__________________
.
Loving my own dongle.

It's small but it gives me pleasure.
---------------------------------
Herb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2008   #12
Lives for gear
 
rhythminmind's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,076

Thread Starter
Great another read one sentence and get sidetracked thread. I guess the "quick fix/non questioning" crowd is in every circle.

So does anyone know the reasoning behind the change? Simple as that.
Quote:
I just want to know why. Was is a lawsuit? Did a company bitch?
rhythminmind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2008   #13
Tui
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,430

Quote:
Originally Posted by gfx View Post
Personally when using AUDIO plug ins I tend to use my EARS!

This fascination with hardware looking plug ins is just ridiculous

If you or anyone else buy audio products based on appearance then imho you have problems that no one can solve.

This thread is just another example of whats wrong with the current buying market.

Crazy Crazy Crazy.
What exactly is so "crazy"? That some people appreciate an aesthetically pleasing GUI? Would you also say that people who appreciate nice clothes, furniture and wallpaper are "crazy"?

When I am in front of the screen all day - and I often am - I expect the different GUI elements to assist me in my work. I have no use for GUIs that are so dark that I can hardly read the writing on faders and push buttons. I also can't stand GUIs that appear to be designed only to impress, but offer limited functionality.

I mentioned the FullTec because it isn't too dark, has nice, chunky knobs to play with, and all functions are immediately obvious, rather than hidden in some obscure sub-menu. That's how it should be done.

Naturally, I will still use certain plugs even though I dislike their GUI. Many stock Logic plugs, for example, I find plain ugly, but they get the job done.
Tui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2008   #14
Lives for gear
 
mahasandi's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,159

in a waves API thread I recall an API rep
commenting on the entirely unauthorized
nature of the URS GUI's.
Maybe there was some communication
I doubt it ever needed to get to a lawsuit.

I sold my URS plugs ;i wasnt using them,
and I was dissapointed in being ignored
repeatedly when asking
about a possible upgrade to the classic console
eq algorithm. I guess they are really
supporting the cspro which I understand.

URS filled a gap before others by trying to
bring API and Neve style (gui abd freqs)
eqs to software first.
Now that the actual manufactures are endorsing
times have changed.
mahasandi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2008   #15
Lives for gear
 
Switchcraft's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,059

So, I guess they didn't update the algos, just the GUIs?
Switchcraft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2008   #16
Lives for gear
 
rhythminmind's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,076

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Switchcraft View Post
So, I guess they didn't update the algos, just the GUIs?
I don't think they changed the standalone algos. I upgraded mine into the CSP that has updated models. Not that the standalone are bad. I loved them as well.
rhythminmind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2008   #17
Lives for gear
 
rhythminmind's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,076

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by mahasandi View Post
in a waves API thread I recall an API rep
commenting on the entirely unauthorized
nature of the URS GUI's.
Maybe there was some communication
I doubt it ever needed to get to a lawsuit.

I sold my URS plugs ;i wasnt using them,
and I was dissapointed in being ignored
repeatedly when asking
about a possible upgrade to the classic console
eq algorithm. I guess they are really
supporting the cspro which I understand.

URS filled a gap before others by trying to
bring API and Neve style (gui abd freqs)
eqs to software first.
Now that the actual manufactures are endorsing
times have changed.
Thanks for the info..
rhythminmind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2008   #18
Lives for gear
 
Methlab's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Orlando
Posts: 3,686

The CSP doesn't look that hot, but it sounds t1ts so thats all that matters to me.
__________________
Professionally played Basslines for $35 a Track. www.professionalbassguitar.com
Methlab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2008   #19
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,934

If only those EQs had ever actually sounded good...
living sounds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2008   #20
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,613

I honestly prefer the MCDSP Channel G way of same GUI - different models at touch of a button. More functionality.
computa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2008   #21
GSF
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 281

Somehow I suspect that Waves had a hand in this.
GSF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2008   #22
Gear addict
 
Resonant Alien's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 381

I'm sure that once UA came out with their authorized Neve plugs and Waves came out with their authorized API plugs, URS started getting a little heat from UA, Neve, API and Waves to make their GUIs less of a visual rip-off.
Resonant Alien is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2008   #23
Lives for gear
 
Switchcraft's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,059

Well, If I cant look at the pretty GUI, I atleast want to new algo's!
__________________
Discography:
http://www.discogs.com/artist/Ryan+Schwabe
Switchcraft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2008   #24
Gear maniac
 
idrinkalot's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 260

Quote:
Originally Posted by mahasandi View Post
in a waves API thread I recall an API rep
commenting on the entirely unauthorized
nature of the URS GUI's.
Maybe there was some communication
I doubt it ever needed to get to a lawsuit.

I sold my URS plugs ;i wasnt using them,
and I was dissapointed in being ignored
repeatedly when asking
about a possible upgrade to the classic console
eq algorithm. I guess they are really
supporting the cspro which I understand.

URS filled a gap before others by trying to
bring API and Neve style (gui abd freqs)
eqs to software first.
Now that the actual manufactures are endorsing
times have changed.
what mak
es a pers
on type l
ike this?
idrinkalot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2008   #25
Lives for gear
 
rhythminmind's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,076

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by GSF View Post
Somehow I suspect that Waves had a hand in this.
That was my 1st thought.
rhythminmind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st February 2008   #26
Gear addict
 
OldSkool's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 344

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tui View Post
What exactly is so "crazy"? That some people appreciate an aesthetically pleasing GUI? Would you also say that people who appreciate nice clothes, furniture and wallpaper are "crazy"?

When I am in front of the screen all day - and I often am - I expect the different GUI elements to assist me in my work. I have no use for GUIs that are so dark that I can hardly read the writing on faders and push buttons. I also can't stand GUIs that appear to be designed only to impress, but offer limited functionality.

I mentioned the FullTec because it isn't too dark, has nice, chunky knobs to play with, and all functions are immediately obvious, rather than hidden in some obscure sub-menu. That's how it should be done.

Naturally, I will still use certain plugs even though I dislike their GUI. Many stock Logic plugs, for example, I find plain ugly, but they get the job done.
+1. I love good GUIs. Good GUI design shows that the company cares about marketing as much as sound - common sense IMO.

Anyway, if you're a gear slut, and a virtual one at that, don't you want stuff that looks as slutty as possible? None of the women I know would dare wear (proudly) the title "shoe slut" if they wore Birkenstocks, no matter how practical and comfortable they are. Lousy analogy? Maybe - it's Friday.
__________________
"I wish every day was Negro Day!"

- Tracy Turnblad, Hairspray
OldSkool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd February 2008   #27
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 759

Quote:
Originally Posted by GSF View Post
Somehow I suspect that Waves had a hand in this.
So do Universal Audio with their Neves...
pigcat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd February 2008   #28
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,154

+1 for nice looking gui's.

if they had urs plugs with hot chicks for knobs i would probably buy those ones.
quincyg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd February 2008   #29
Lives for gear
 
elambo's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: Up here
Posts: 6,181

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhythminmind View Post
Great another read one sentence and get sidetracked thread. I guess the "quick fix/non questioning" crowd is in every circle.

So does anyone know the reasoning behind the change? Simple as that.
What did you expect? There's not a whole lotta meat to dig into with this thread. Unauthentic GUIs??? Not much meat.
elambo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd February 2008   #30
Lives for gear
 
sonicdefault's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,535

When you start feeling homesick for and old GUI, just click your heels together 3 times and say, "There's nothing like real hardware, there's nothing like real hardware..."



-SD
__________________
...My goal for many, many years was to obtain a beautiful API desk and be buried with it when I die...
vin-gear

...My 57 is only a few years old, but I'd like to think that someday my children can pass it down to their children.
Killahurts

...I would much rather tweak a moog than that thing bro...
MYAMS
sonicdefault is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
UAD-1 or URS Channel Strip Pro for authentic compressor emulations? Tubthumper So much gear, so little time! 22 1st September 2009 03:16 PM
Most authentic Leslie for a Hammond M3? Roger Starr So much gear, so little time! 10 29th April 2009 04:55 AM
Need an authentic gospel choir sedohr Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 7 18th February 2007 12:06 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:23 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.