Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > News > The Moan Zone


New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 6th October 2007   #1
Lives for gear
 
RedWallStudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 928

Thread Starter
API Missed the boat with the 1608

I’ve been in the market for a high end but smaller format console for quite a while now, and I had high hopes that the 1608 would be “it”. But after really taking a hard look at the 1608, API really left me wondering who they were marketing this console to. Its far too limited to really be used as a main desk for anyone doing any serious projects. But on the other hand, it is waaaay too expensive and over-featured as a side car. I understand they looked at the coveted 1604, which is a small-console-gem as their starting point. But they got so wrapped up in making a console that is only marginally more useful than the 1604 and missed a potential goldmine of sales if they had just changed a couple of key things. So, if API, or anyone else is reading, here is what you missed:

1) Inline monitoring. Ugh. With only 16 channels, would it have killed ya to make it an in-line console with a separate fader, or even a rotary pot? You’ve got the 312 mic pre there, why couldn’t you configure it so the 312 is what you hit tape or pro-tools with and the fader is your monitor feed?

2) 8 Channel expansion buckets. Why did you make the expansion buckets 16 channels and () 32k?!?!? Did you actually sell any of the 16 channel buckets? I thought not.

3) D-Sub - There is really no need for the amount of XLR & TRS connections on the back of the console. You should have just gone with D-sub everywhere (we know it is a little pro-sumer, but we have gotten used to it) and spent the money elsewhere.

Basically, if you would have come up with a 24 channel console that was in-line, with 8 of the channels having 312c’s (16 channels being line input only) with 24 eq’s for 60k... I would have been thrilled. But the way you have it configured now, there is no way I can make it work. You go back to the drawing board boys and I’ll head over to E-bay.
__________________
"I feel so miserable without you; it's almost like having you here." Stephen Bishop
RedWallStudio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2009   #2
Lives for gear
 
carlheinz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: S.California
Posts: 868

I know this thread was D.O.A. but it comes up when I google search around for info on the 1608.I'm curious nobody responded in agreement or disagreement,The 1608 and 5088 and possibly the newer SSL products are all fighting for some sort of niche but is there a clear winner regardless of price?Sorry if this should have been a new thread.
carlheinz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2009   #3
Lives for gear
 
lowfreq33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 2,186

No, there's no clear winner, because all of the "high end" small format consoles are too expensive for their target consumers and don't have enough features. The closest anyone has come is the Toft ATB.
__________________
Is Wayne Brady gonna have to choke a bitch?!
lowfreq33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2009   #4
Lives for gear
 
slaves666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Montreal
Posts: 2,155

Send a message via AIM to slaves666
With the prices for modules where they are,

512 - 16 x $760 = $12160

550a - 12x $1015 = $12180

560 - 4 x $760 = $3040

525 - 4 x $1015 = $4060

Total $31420.

That means the rest of the console accounts for $18579 of the cost. The price is a little high, but at just under 40k, I doubt they would have sold tons more consoles.

I do agree that it is too small to be a studio center-piece, and too big to be a sidecar, but I don't think they were looking for entry level studio owners for a purchase.
slaves666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2009   #5
Gear Guru
 
Sounds Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 18,024

I want one!
Sounds Great is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2009   #6
Gear nut
 
macakinho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 89

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sounds Great View Post
I want one!

me too!!!!!
macakinho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2009   #7
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,342

Quote:
No, there's no clear winner, because all of the "high end" small format consoles are too expensive for their target consumers and don't have enough features. The closest anyone has come is the Toft ATB.
I don't think that the target consumers for the API/RND/SSL consoles are the same as those for the ATB.

I'm fairly certain that the SSL has outsold the other two, but I know a lot of the API consoles are being installed and I've heard of a few RND consoles as well...and I'm fairly certain that the people who are in the position to spend that kind of money are aware of the features that the consoles do and don't have.
Duardo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2009   #8
Gear Guru
 
Sounds Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 18,024

For somebody who wants a small console to hook up to a 16 track and wouldn't mind API pres' and eq's, this console would be just the ticket.
__________________
http://soundcloud.com/sounds-great-1

-Rob

Kicking around on a piece of ground in your home town
Waiting for someone or something to show you the way.
Sounds Great is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2009   #9
Lives for gear
 
lowfreq33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 2,186

I've priced some of this out, and to me it seems better (for 16 - 24 tracks) to have outboard pre's and eq's, a simple controller (Euphonix MC Mix?) and a separate summing box.

I won't say the Matrix and 1608 are overpriced, the components and workmanship absolutely justify the price, I just think that anyone who has that much cash to spend would spend just a bit more and get a real console.
lowfreq33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2009   #10
Gear Guru
 
Sounds Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 18,024

Quote:
Originally Posted by lowfreq33 View Post
would spend just a bit more and get a real console.
Sounds Great is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th June 2009   #11
Lives for gear
 
The MPCist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,479

I think that the API 1608 is a great product and wouldn't mind having one!
__________________
THE MPCIST
The MPCist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th June 2009   #12
Lives for gear
 
dan p's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: san ramon ca
Posts: 1,191

Quote:
Originally Posted by lowfreq33 View Post
I've priced some of this out, and to me it seems better (for 16 - 24 tracks) to have outboard pre's and eq's, a simple controller (Euphonix MC Mix?) and a separate summing box.

I won't say the Matrix and 1608 are overpriced, the components and workmanship absolutely justify the price, I just think that anyone who has that much cash to spend would spend just a bit more and get a real console.
There is a post around GS with a hybrid setup,Euphonix mix/toft32 for summing.I believe its steve at cryptic globe in tennessee.




Dan P
dan p is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th June 2009   #13
Lives for gear
 
Meriphew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Seattle USA
Posts: 2,874

Quote:
Originally Posted by macakinho View Post
me too!!!!!
Me three. Though the Neve 5088 looks pretty tempting as well.
Meriphew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th June 2009   #14
Lives for gear
 
Marcocet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 1,196



Yes they sold some extenders. At least one here.

Overall I paid under 70k for the whole desk. We're talking about a brand new desk with a warranty that has the same discreet circuit design they've been using since the 70's. No other bullshit. Since I work out of pro tools it's easy enough to monitor in line (mic pre out->PT in->PT out->insert pre fader). The fact that it's all XLR / TRS cabling can get a bit messy but it means that I can easily interface it with anything without spending a ton on Dsub cabling, and move it from place to place (which I have twice already). Mind you I wouldn't have complained if the back was all dsubs either...

I've worked a bit on a TOFT ATB and it's really not the same league at all. The API sounds like you'd expect an API to sound, and it's exactly the size of console I'd need in my place. The only thing I'd like would be fader automation which is supposed to be coming eventually.
Marcocet is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 25th June 2009   #15
Lives for gear
 
Silver Sonya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 6,978

An API 1608 in your studio is such a fantastic display of good taste. It shows good values, high aesthetics, and an instinct for badassery.

Yeah, I just coined the term badassery. Wanna fight?

- c
Silver Sonya is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 25th June 2009   #16
Gear Guru
 
Sounds Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 18,024

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcocet View Post

Very nice! thumbsup
Sounds Great is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th June 2009   #17
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2

HMMMMM

Quote:
Originally Posted by carlheinz View Post
I know this thread was D.O.A. but it comes up when I google search around for info on the 1608.I'm curious nobody responded in agreement or disagreement,The 1608 and 5088 and possibly the newer SSL products are all fighting for some sort of niche but is there a clear winner regardless of price?Sorry if this should have been a new thread.

I too find it interesting that this link comes up when googling..there must be a lot of people checking out this thread, even two years later! From what I've seen and heard, though, API is doing well with the 1608, with and without expanders. They're being used on front line projects too.
mrknowitall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th June 2009   #18
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,342

Just saw an expanded model on the cover of this month's Mix magazine...
Duardo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th June 2009   #19
Gear nut
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 82

I checked out the 1608 at NAMM last year, which really just means I drooled all over it since I didn't have the opportunity to actually use it.

I swear - even with the din of the trade floor rumbling in my ears, when I stood right in front of it and put my hands on the faders, I could actually hear some of the most amazing sounds coming out of it - like a chorus of angels or an entire field of flowers blooming at once

Too bad so pricey or I would have bought one and put it in my bedroom and never looked at internet porn again
CAMGRec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2009   #20
Lives for gear
 
PlayRadioPlay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Aledo, TX
Posts: 563

Send a message via AIM to PlayRadioPlay
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcocet View Post


Yes they sold some extenders. At least one here.

Overall I paid under 70k for the whole desk. We're talking about a brand new desk with a warranty that has the same discreet circuit design they've been using since the 70's. No other bullshit. Since I work out of pro tools it's easy enough to monitor in line (mic pre out->PT in->PT out->insert pre fader). The fact that it's all XLR / TRS cabling can get a bit messy but it means that I can easily interface it with anything without spending a ton on Dsub cabling, and move it from place to place (which I have twice already). Mind you I wouldn't have complained if the back was all dsubs either...

I've worked a bit on a TOFT ATB and it's really not the same league at all. The API sounds like you'd expect an API to sound, and it's exactly the size of console I'd need in my place. The only thing I'd like would be fader automation which is supposed to be coming eventually.
I love that you have a boombox for monitoring. I've been thinking about throwing some shitty computer speakers next to my Adam A7s.
__________________
Daniel Hunter
Analog Rebellion
PlayRadioPlay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2009   #21
Lives for gear
 
Meriphew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Seattle USA
Posts: 2,874

Quote:
Originally Posted by PlayRadioPlay View Post
I love that you have a boombox for monitoring.
That's not for monitoring. That's what Marc uses to record on. Screw Pro Tools and 2" tape.
__________________
Myspace*Meriphew
Meriphew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2009   #22
Lives for gear
 
DontLetMeDrown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Camarillo, CA
Posts: 1,789

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcocet View Post

Wow those NS-10s weathered the ****ing storm didn't they?
DontLetMeDrown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd July 2009   #23
tekis
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Yeah, what's ups with the back?

They should've put D-Subs/ELCO's on there! Could've saved a couple grand. No in-line monitoring? Inexcusable! I'm sure it sounds great.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th September 2009   #24
Gear addict
 
loveinoctober's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 499

Quote:
Originally Posted by macakinho View Post
me too!!!!!
I want one to. I mixed on one the other day and it's like a sonic wet dream come true! The easiest board I've ever mixed on by far!

Erik
loveinoctober is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th November 2009   #25
Gear Head
 
themn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 48

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcocet View Post


Yes they sold some extenders. At least one here.

Overall I paid under 70k for the whole desk. We're talking about a brand new desk with a warranty that has the same discreet circuit design they've been using since the 70's. No other bullshit. Since I work out of pro tools it's easy enough to monitor in line (mic pre out->PT in->PT out->insert pre fader). The fact that it's all XLR / TRS cabling can get a bit messy but it means that I can easily interface it with anything without spending a ton on Dsub cabling, and move it from place to place (which I have twice already). Mind you I wouldn't have complained if the back was all dsubs either...

I've worked a bit on a TOFT ATB and it's really not the same league at all. The API sounds like you'd expect an API to sound, and it's exactly the size of console I'd need in my place. The only thing I'd like would be fader automation which is supposed to be coming eventually.
*drools*
themn is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
The New API 1608 Console jbohn High end 434 15th November 2008 09:12 AM
New API 1608 Videos - Rear Panel and Overview From Vintage King Audio jfleibo So much gear, so little time! 16 15th September 2007 02:02 AM
API 1608 Jack P Product Alerts older than 2 months 37 17th August 2007 10:18 PM
Have I missed something? Faderjockey So much gear, so little time! 3 4th February 2007 06:04 PM
Missed Glastonbury cally The Moan Zone 0 30th June 2003 05:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:17 PM.

 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com Limited - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office: 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.