Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Mastering forum


New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10th November 2006   #1
Gear maniac
 
emeline-rec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 194

Thread Starter
CD Audio and Data

Ok, This is something that has confused me for a while.

Say we burn a audio CD-r at high speed then it is susceptible to a high error count. Also if we rip audio fast as a burst copy then lots of errors can happen. either way the audio is no longer exactly the same as the wav/aif we burned.

However we can copy data to and from a CD-r as fast as we like with no data loss. I believe this is the reason a DDP file would be favored by a manufacturing plant to an orange book CD-r.

So my question is whats the difference? surely digital data is just binary be it cd audio or a wav file on a CD-r so why are more errors created when dealing with cd audio as opposed to data files?

Thank you,

Ian
emeline-rec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th November 2006   #2
Mastering Moderator
 
Riccardo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Always on the Run
Posts: 2,570

Verified Member
Error correction is different in Yellow Book (data CD-ROM) hence the reliability.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbow_Books
__________________
Velvet Room Mastering



"Can you imagine how great the Beatles or Pink Floyd could have sounded if they had used better cables?

I expect a Nobel prize to someday be awarded to an audiophile cable designer, as they clearly are way ahead of the rest of us.
" - DC -
Riccardo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th November 2006   #3
Gear addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The wilds of Hampshire, UK
Posts: 422

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by emeline-rec View Post
Say we burn a audio CD-r at high speed then it is susceptible to a high error count. Also if we rip audio fast as a burst copy then lots of errors can happen. either way the audio is no longer exactly the same as the wav/aif we burned.
All the errors in this process can be corrected - if you are doing things properly then the ripped files will be identical to the source files, no matter what speed you are working at. The only difference between audio and data CD's is that there is one less layer of error correction for audio CD's and some CD drives (and most software) don't handle audio errors properly.

Cheers

James.
jamesp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th November 2006   #4
Gear maniac
 
emeline-rec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 194

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riccardo View Post
Error correction is different in Yellow Book (data CD-ROM) hence the reliability.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbow_Books
doesn't orange book deal with data as well as audio? this is quite confusing. from what i've read it seems any burnable cd comes under orange book. so does the data side of orange book have better error correction than the cd-da

ian
emeline-rec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th November 2006   #5
Mastering Moderator
 
Riccardo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Always on the Run
Posts: 2,570

Verified Member
Yes it does....
"The recorded CD-R disc is “Red Book or Yellow Book compatible” so it can play back on conventional CD players. The CD-R format gives the possibility for both Audio (CD-DA) and Data (CD-ROM) recording. "

http://www.licensing.philips.com/information/cd/rec/
Riccardo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th November 2006   #6
Lives for gear
 
Cojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden!
Posts: 1,471

Hi.

I've always been thinking of this as audio CD is a live data stream and because of this only have a limited amount of time to do error correction while data CD has all the time in the world and can repeat a section over and over again until it gets it right.

/Cojo
__________________
Conny Johansson
[ www.asteroidkiller.com ]
Cojo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th November 2006   #7
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 987

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cojo View Post
I've always been thinking of this as audio CD is a live data stream and because of this only have a limited amount of time to do error correction while data CD has all the time in the world and can repeat a section over and over again until it gets it right.
It's a holdover from the state of the art in technology when the format was defined (almost 30 years ago!) Good error correction requires several things--additional storage capacity (to hold the redundant data that makes error correction possible), sufficient RAM to do read-ahead (since the error correction takes time, and you don't want the audio to stop), and enough digital processing thrust to pull it all off.

All of this was rather difficult back in the bad old days, but can be done with a nickel's worth of sand today.
dkatz42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th November 2006   #8
Gear maniac
 
emeline-rec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 194

Thread Starter
thanks for your replys, thats clarified things a bit for me,

emeline-rec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th December 2006   #9
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: OTTAWA
Posts: 642

I'm a bit confused here ...

Isn't a file just a file ... audio or data? I'd thing the burning s/w wouldn't know the difference and wouldn't care ... but I must be missing something ....

imho It would differ if you were burning audio from a live source in real time ... hence the error correction s/w would have timing constraints ... but here we are talking about a resident WAV file ... and as such I can't see how the error rates could be different ...

jls
jlsgear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th December 2006   #10
Gear addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The wilds of Hampshire, UK
Posts: 422

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlsgear View Post

Isn't a file just a file ... audio or data? I'd thing the burning s/w wouldn't know the difference and wouldn't care ... but I must be missing something ....
Audio CD's and data CD's are very different. Audio CD's have a single long stream of data on them and no file structure. Data CD's have a similar long stream of data but also have an additional layer of error correction and a file structure which reduces the capacity of the disc. Have you ever wondered why a disc that holds 80 minutes of audio (800MB) will only handle 700MB of data? That 100MB is used up by the extra layer of error correction.

The error correction on audio CD's is fairly formidable as they stand with two levels of correction but the data CD adds a third layer. Most of the problems with audio errors when extracting CD's aren't down to the lack of error correction - they are more down to the poor audio error flagging on many CD drives and the lack of support for these flags in the extraction software. It seems strange, with the popularity of mp3 players and the widespread disc extraction going on, that more attention hasn't been paid to this but there are still many drives that cannot extract audio properly.

Cheers

James.
jamesp is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Studer A 820 Error: Audio Data Lost wkpowers Geekslutz forum 3 22nd October 2005 08:15 PM
Too much data for CD-R? paultools Music computers 4 12th July 2005 04:26 PM
Is this true? A program that converts audio data into graphics data for the Vid Card o--- Music computers 2 24th May 2005 03:27 AM
CD-R, audio or data tommyd So much gear, so little time! 3 20th June 2003 06:02 PM
audio data recovery needed...where to go? Jamz Music computers 4 21st December 2002 10:56 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:17 PM.

 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com Limited - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office: 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.