22nd December 2012
|
#181 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Aug 2012 Location: Stamford, CT
Posts: 500
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse Graffam | What you call the "K-Man" standard(ragged looking waveforms chockful of transients) was how most mixing and mastering was done for decades until the 1990s. Ain't nothing new.
I'm just trying to bring it back, that's all!
(why do I get the feeling that I'm older than most of Gearslutz?)
__________________ - Welcome to 21st Century Mastering Services, where your choices are LOUD, LOUD, and LOUD! Have a pleasant stay. :D |
| |
28th December 2012
|
#183 | | Gear addict
Joined: Jul 2012 Location: Connecticut, USA
Posts: 301
Thread Starter |
What are you guys using for limiters (plugins, hardware, etc.)???
|
| |
28th December 2012
|
#184 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Mar 2004 Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 933
|
This attempt was-
Pro Audio DSP DSM
UAD Manley Massive Passive
UAD Precision Maximizer
Ozone 5 Limiter
|
| |
28th December 2012
|
#185 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Feb 2006 Location: Milan Verified Member | Quote:
Originally Posted by OwensDrumming What are you guys using for limiters (plugins, hardware, etc.)??? | Already listed mine. If I'm going for loudness I'll usually clip the Crookwood ADC and add Elephant, but things tend to start sounding nasty after 2-3dB limiting.
|
| |
29th December 2012
|
#187 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Mar 2009 Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,671
Verified Member |
It normally always turns out to be something that has been tracked too hot in the recording stage.
The crackle only really shows up when you start to try N make it loud.
Also, watch out for reds N overs within plugs.
Some plugs, especially in PTHD, run at fixed point, which means you don't wanna be hammering em.
Take care of the above points, make sure you are happy with the way the mix sounds when you turn up your monitoring, send to a good ME, tell him (or her) how you want it, enjoy, hopefully
__________________
Ade Emsley
|
| |
29th December 2012
|
#188 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Aug 2007 Location: France
Posts: 535
| Quote:
Originally Posted by OwensDrumming What are you guys using for limiters (plugins, hardware, etc.)??? | I use my own limiter design. It has adaptive look ahead and release which preserve both bass and clarity. More info can be found here: 4 Gain Reduction Strategies - YouTube |
| |
30th December 2012
|
#189 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Mar 2009 Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,671
Verified Member | Quote:
Originally Posted by marchhare This attempt was-
Pro Audio DSP DSM
UAD Manley Massive Passive
UAD Precision Maximizer
Ozone 5 Limiter | Not too shabby for an ITB cut.
That mix seemed to benefit from the color added by DSM and UAD Mass Pass and of course, what you did with those four plugs.
I'm guessing UAD modelled that unit with the transformers in the signal?
Although I have the hardware mastering version (don't use it that often), I've never checked out the UAD software version.
|
| |
30th December 2012
|
#190 | | Gear interested
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 25
| Zippyshare.com - LUVMASTER.wav
Plugin chain:
Precision Multiband -> UAD Limiter -> Brainworx V2 -> UAD Precision EQ -> UAD Limiter
|
| |
30th December 2012
|
#191 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Mar 2004 Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 933
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Table Of Tone Not too shabby for an ITB cut.
That mix seemed to benefit from the color added by DSM and UAD Mass Pass and of course, what you did with those four plugs.
I'm guessing UAD modelled that unit with the transformers in the signal?
Although I have the hardware mastering version (don't use it that often), I've never checked out the UAD software version. | Thanks Adrian! On a side note, the Rockerverb 50 was one of the best amps
I've owned, stupidly I sold mine, gonna get another one soon. I just picked up the Precision Maximizer recently, I really like what it does, makes things louder and somehow increases the punch, too. You mentioned in your earlier post how things really start to crackle when you make them louder, in this mix the vocal is distorted on the chorus, so that's obviously a problem.
I've been revisiting the idea of multiple limiters, each doing a small amount.
Never had much luck with it until I tried putting the DSM first. Too early to
tell, but so far it seems to be working well.
|
| |
30th December 2012
|
#192 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Mar 2009 Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,671
Verified Member |
Interestingly, the DSM really works well when following the A to D on Forssell MADA 2.
FGX doesn't!
Things were very different with a Prism AD 2.
FGX loved it but DSM didn't!
Funny how things work, right?
|
| |
31st December 2012
|
#193 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 765
| Quote:
Originally Posted by OwensDrumming I'm having trouble getting maximum volume out of my pop tracks. I'm using a limiter on my master bus and whenever I push the threshold, it distorts. I've tried using them in series and that does the same thing. Are there any tricks to get maximum loudness like you hear on today's music? I've tried several limiters and the same thing happens. Am I using the plugins wrong? Thanks.
P.S. I'm primarily using a Massey L2007 limiter. I love that thing. It's so musical. | I think only so much can happen in mastering.
If thats what the track needs, I think it needs to happen in the arrangement and the mix.
Something that ALWAYS works for me is to squeeze a little in many places, as opposed to hammering it just on the subs, of the mix.
|
| |
31st December 2012
|
#194 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Jul 2002 Location: The Big Apple
Posts: 277
Verified Member | |
| |
31st December 2012
|
#195 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 278
|
You really need to wrap your head around this, it's all that matters to an artist.
A. A mix is a dynamic evolving/devolving thing.
B. A mix is really achieved by multiple layers of pristine sound to begin with.
C. A mix, when maximised for clarity and dynamic range per individual track, will MASTER with relatively little effort.
D. A mix that gets a girl wet or a man hard is a mix that BEGS to be TURNED UP!
E. A mix that sounds great at 20% of the available gain range of it's intended delivery device is a mix that will be remembered and requested again and again.
F. U are going to need more than a computer...
G. A mix HAS to be MASTERED for it's intended delivery device, else you fail, suck, and waste time, money and skill. If you are trying to get this tune into a radio broadcast rig, versus a club PA, versus an Ipod, versus TV broadcast, or movie sound stage, each environment will require a different set of considerations: mathematical, aesthetic and spatial/acoustical.
You ask a simple question regarding an entire enclycopedic knowledge of a subject matter you clearly don't understand. Read and learn alot more about the subject before asking anything further about it.
|
| |
31st December 2012
|
#196 | | Lives for gear
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,226
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Temple of Light You really need to wrap your head around this, it's all that matters to an artist.
A. A mix is a dynamic evolving/devolving thing.
B. A mix is really achieved by multiple layers of pristine sound to begin with.
C. A mix, when maximised for clarity and dynamic range per individual track, will MASTER with relatively little effort.
D. A mix that gets a girl wet or a man hard is a mix that BEGS to be TURNED UP!
E. A mix that sounds great at 20% of the available gain range of it's intended delivery device is a mix that will be remembered and requested again and again.
F. U are going to need more than a computer...
G. A mix HAS to be MASTERED for it's intended delivery device, else you fail, suck, and waste time, money and skill. If you are trying to get this tune into a radio broadcast rig, versus a club PA, versus an Ipod, versus TV broadcast, or movie sound stage, each environment will require a different set of considerations: mathematical, aesthetic and spatial/acoustical.
You ask a simple question regarding an entire enclycopedic knowledge of a subject matter you clearly don't understand. Read and learn alot more about the subject before asking anything further about it. | IOW, he didn't master engmix's sample.
|
| |
31st December 2012
|
#197 | | Lives for gear
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,226
|
Maybe we should all have a second round with a different genre? Hopefully get some better critique this time.
|
| |
31st December 2012
|
#198 | | Gear addict
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 425
| Quote:
Originally Posted by maxon | How to download from this filehosting service ? It just reloads the page everytime I try...
|
| |
31st December 2012
|
#199 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Feb 2006 Location: Milan Verified Member | Quote:
Originally Posted by OpusOfTrolls Maybe we should all have a second round with a different genre? Hopefully get some better critique this time. | it's why i love the REP WUMP so much. there are clearly set down rules and time frames, two or three separate threads for different parts of the discussion, if there are many entries they are split into two or three groups, all users sign up BEFORE, so you don't get any last minute stragglers, no revisions allowed, entry dates are clearly laid out beforehand etc. one unofficial rule is that if you fail to comment on EVERYBODY else's entry (in your group), then you are banned from taking part the next WUMP. it all works really well. but i tried to implement similar ideas on another (non-professional) music forum once, and it all just went to shit... |
| |
31st December 2012
|
#200 | | Gear interested
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 25
| Quote:
Originally Posted by sanddigger1 How to download from this filehosting service ? It just reloads the page everytime I try... | Zippyshare.com - LUVMASTER.wav
orange "DOWNLOAD NOW" right side up
|
| |
31st December 2012
|
#201 | | Gear addict
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 425
| Quote:
Originally Posted by maxon | ...which just reloads the page...
thanks anyway.
|
| |
31st December 2012
|
#203 | | Gear addict
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 425
|
Dropbox works fine. Thanks a lot. |
| |
31st December 2012
|
#204 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2004 Location: Eugene Oregon
Posts: 1,164
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Babaluma it's why i love the REP WUMP so much. there are clearly set down rules and time frames, two or three separate threads for different parts of the discussion, if there are many entries they are split into two or three groups, all users sign up BEFORE, so you don't get any last minute stragglers, no revisions allowed, entry dates are clearly laid out beforehand etc. one unofficial rule is that if you fail to comment on EVERYBODY else's entry (in your group), then you are banned from taking part the next WUMP. it all works really well. but i tried to implement similar ideas on another (non-professional) music forum once, and it all just went to shit...  | Wow...WUMP still thrives?
Years ago, I learned a lot through WUMP. For anyone seriously wanting to learn about mastering, from ME's I highly suggest it.
|
| |
2nd January 2013
|
#205 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 278
| Quote:
Originally Posted by OpusOfTrolls IOW, he didn't master engmix's sample. | Like I HAVE TIME TO DO WORK FOR FREE?
OP should be paying me just for the advice!
|
| |
2nd January 2013
|
#206 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Mar 2006 Location: New York City | Quote:
Originally Posted by Temple of Light Like I HAVE TIME TO DO WORK FOR FREE?
OP should be paying me just for the advice! | Hey Temp, i don't think anyone is asking for free work here. I posted this sample for a very specific purpose, for those who genuinely wanted to get involved. This isn't a symposium on how to mix, just purely for getting hot masters. I left the distorted vocal on purpose to see how some would handle the task of dealing with it. I thought this would be a good chance to see how some purely in the box and hybrid approaches were utilized. Did you take a crack at mastering the sample, if so, could you point me to it, i would love to hear it, and hopefully you listed what you used, and your speakers.
When i was an assistant engineer back in the day i had the chance to see others at work on a daily basis. That was the primary point of this throw-down. For myself and others to see who's doing what, with what, and why.
|
| |
2nd January 2013
|
#207 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Mar 2006 Location: New York City | Quote:
Originally Posted by OpusOfTrolls Maybe we should all have a second round with a different genre? Hopefully get some better critique this time. | This would be a fantastic idea. I do have another track laying around that's a pop rock record that we could use, but perhaps someone else should pony up a track so it's not from the same source.
|
| |
2nd January 2013
|
#208 | | Gear addict
Joined: Jul 2004 Location: Midtown, NYC
Posts: 474
| Quote:
Originally Posted by mcsnare | my God... Dave McNair is here for an online shoouout... The OP must be happy!!!!
__________________
"Much can be accomplished if one is not interested in taking credit"
George Massenburg
|
| |
2nd January 2013
|
#209 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Oct 2004 Location: Norway
Posts: 288
|
I enjoyed Brian L's comments earlier in the thread. Would be interesting to see him give it a whirl as well.
JB
|
| |
3rd January 2013
|
#210 | | Gear interested
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 25
|
one more attempt. My secret weapon for very very quick mastering. ONLY ONE plugin on master chain (no eq no limiters no compresors) only Tony Maserati plugin, 30 sec knob settings and done. https://www.dropbox.com/s/x2hqntma97...UGINMASTER.wav |
| | | |