Login / Register
 
How to get super loud pop tracks?
New Reply
Subscribe
#91
18th December 2012
Old 18th December 2012
  #91
Lives for gear
 
The_K_Man's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Location: Stamford, CT
Posts: 1,480

The_K_Man is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by wado1942 View Post
I said I can't think of a song that only sounds great as a crushed master. MGMT's demo is about -10dBfs RMS, whereas the "studio" release is about 5dB hotter and sounds horrid, though it's largely the same production style.
I'll take the demo over the studio, thanks.
#92
18th December 2012
Old 18th December 2012
  #92
Lives for gear
 
wado1942's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 2,741

wado1942 is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_K_Man View Post
I'll take the demo over the studio, thanks.
That's what I'M saying!
#93
18th December 2012
Old 18th December 2012
  #93
Lives for gear
 
marchhare's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 987

marchhare is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by engmix View Post
Who's up for a little friendly Mastering Throw-down. I'll try and provide a minute of a track, a quick but decent mix, and see how far it can get pushed without total destruction. Then we can reveal our process (gear, converters, plugins) and see what the results are... And if someone feels that keeping their Master at -18 RMS verses someone at -8 then cool, we can debate the impact of the results.

Who's in? I personally won't post a track unless there's at least 10 engineers out there willing to dive in.
I'm in.
#94
18th December 2012
Old 18th December 2012
  #94
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,395

Cheebs Goat is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by wado1942 View Post
I said I can't think of a song that only sounds great as a crushed master. MGMT's demo is about -10dBfs RMS, whereas the "studio" release is about 5dB hotter and sounds horrid, though it's largely the same production style.
We've just wandered into "agree to dissagree" territory.
Deleted User #43636
#95
18th December 2012
Old 18th December 2012
  #95
Deleted User #43636
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Quote:
Originally Posted by engmix
Who's up for a little friendly Mastering Throw-down. I'll try and provide a minute of a track, a quick but decent mix, and see how far it can get pushed without total destruction. Then we can reveal our process (gear, converters, plugins) and see what the results are... And if someone feels that keeping their Master at -18 RMS verses someone at -8 then cool, we can debate the impact of the results.

Who's in? I personally won't post a track unless there's at least 10 engineers out there willing to dive in
.
I'm in too.
#96
19th December 2012
Old 19th December 2012
  #96
Lives for gear
 
engmix's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,358
My Recordings/Credits

engmix is offline
Mastering Throw Down

Ok, so i've gotten a few PM's from those who are interested in having a bit of fun. And that's the hope, that this is all in good fun, educational, and not a personal verbal smack down. Personally i'm super stoked to have some potential heavy hitters get involved. It will be good to see up and comers get into it too. As well as Digital and Analog Hybrid approaches. Obviously i can't wax any rules with this, it's an open forum, but my hope is, that all involved will reveal their processing chain, software, and concepts into why they did what they did.

In the next 48 to 72 hours (i have some records that i'm in the middle of working on) i will post a minute of a demo that is currently collecting dust. It's in the pop mid tempo realm. It's very dynamic, which will help to make this interesting.
Hermetech Mastering
Verified Member
#97
19th December 2012
Old 19th December 2012
  #97
Lives for gear
 
Hermetech Mastering's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Location: Milan

Verified Member
Hermetech Mastering is offline
i'm in too, but the target is a little unclear. are we supposed to be making it as loud as we can (going against what i would usually go for), or are we going for the best possible sound?

i think you do have to be careful with these shootouts. the way they work on the REP forum with the WUMPs is great (loads of pros helping each other out, and a real lack of egos), but i've seen them get very nasty on certain other forums. i'm just not sure there's enough maturity shown on here for it to be anything other than a huge cluster****.
Quote
1
#98
19th December 2012
Old 19th December 2012
  #98
Lives for gear
 
engmix's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,358
My Recordings/Credits

engmix is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Babaluma View Post
i'm in too, but the target is a little unclear. are we supposed to be making it as loud as we can (going against what i would usually go for), or are we going for the best possible sound?

i think you do have to be careful with these shootouts. the way they work on the REP forum with the WUMPs is great (loads of pros helping each other out, and a real lack of egos), but i've seen them get very nasty on certain other forums. i'm just not sure there's enough maturity shown on here for it to be anything other than a huge cluster****.
The thread says it all "loud pop tracks" but that is up to the person mastering the track. Loud with quality being the focus, but i think it will be interesting to see what people think is "good" because one's pancake mastering is another's mojo. As for worrying about the trolls and negativity, well this is an open forum, so other than the moderator shutting down the thread, it's at the mercy of all involved. There's also nothing wrong with a bit of ego flaring, it comes with the territory. The good thing about throw downs, is it pretty much weeds out the idiots.
Quote
1
Hermetech Mastering
Verified Member
#99
19th December 2012
Old 19th December 2012
  #99
Lives for gear
 
Hermetech Mastering's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Location: Milan

Verified Member
Hermetech Mastering is offline
Yep, totally agree, and I am really looking forward to this! Thanks for organising and clarifying the "goal". I'm going to aim for a bit louder than I normally would with a client who asks for it loud/louder, so the k man may not want to listen to my entry...
Quote
1
#100
19th December 2012
Old 19th December 2012
  #100
Lives for gear
 
The_K_Man's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Location: Stamford, CT
Posts: 1,480

The_K_Man is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Babaluma View Post
Yep, totally agree, and I am really looking forward to this! Thanks for organising and clarifying the "goal". I'm going to aim for a bit louder than I normally would with a client who asks for it loud/louder, so the k man may not want to listen to my entry...
No personal jabs allowed in this contest.

Put that in the books.
Hermetech Mastering
Verified Member
#101
19th December 2012
Old 19th December 2012
  #101
Lives for gear
 
Hermetech Mastering's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Location: Milan

Verified Member
Hermetech Mastering is offline
Good!

I'm not looking forward to having to perceptually volume match all the entries, it's tiresome work, but the only way for a fair appraisal.

I'd actually like to do two, time permitting. Would that be allowed? One for quality, and one for loudness? Or am I crazy to be second guessing myself before we even begin?
#102
19th December 2012
Old 19th December 2012
  #102
Lives for gear
 
engmix's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,358
My Recordings/Credits

engmix is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_K_Man View Post
No personal jabs allowed in this contest.

Put that in the books.
No worries K-man, this is an open forum, all opinions welcome.
#103
19th December 2012
Old 19th December 2012
  #103
Lives for gear
 
engmix's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,358
My Recordings/Credits

engmix is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Babaluma View Post
Good!

I'm not looking forward to having to perceptually volume match all the entries, it's tiresome work, but the only way for a fair appraisal.

I'd actually like to do two, time permitting. Would that be allowed? One for quality, and one for loudness? Or am I crazy to be second guessing myself before we even begin?
Yes, this is true, and it would be awesome if someone could pickup the slack on this task, but if i have to do it i will. With that said, i think having the files unmatched will be important as well, so we can just see how a master will impact the listener, who's transients are retained well, who's overall frequency balance is well done, within it's intended perceived volume.

And i don't think that this should be about getting the mix as loud as possible and have it suck, it's about getting it competitive in today's realm, but there be some sonic integrity, and that's where things get interesting, because we all hear differently.

I think instead of doing two, do one that you're happy with, and go with it. It's easy to make a nice sounding master where level is not front and center. But again, don't do something outside of what you would consider good taste. I could get my 14 year old niece to turn a mix up to -6 without worrying about compromise.
Hermetech Mastering
Verified Member
#104
19th December 2012
Old 19th December 2012
  #104
Lives for gear
 
Hermetech Mastering's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Location: Milan

Verified Member
Hermetech Mastering is offline
Yeah, thought about this all afternoon, and you're right. Just go for it and do the best you can with "competitive" level in mind. Which is pretty much what I'm doing every day anyway!
#105
19th December 2012
Old 19th December 2012
  #105
Gear addict
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 433

Nonlinear is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by engmix View Post
Ok, so i've gotten a few PM's from those who are interested in having a bit of fun. And that's the hope, that this is all in good fun, educational, and not a personal verbal smack down. Personally i'm super stoked to have some potential heavy hitters get involved. It will be good to see up and comers get into it too. As well as Digital and Analog Hybrid approaches. Obviously i can't wax any rules with this, it's an open forum, but my hope is, that all involved will reveal their processing chain, software, and concepts into why they did what they did.

In the next 48 to 72 hours (i have some records that i'm in the middle of working on) i will post a minute of a demo that is currently collecting dust. It's in the pop mid tempo realm. It's very dynamic, which will help to make this interesting.
I'm in too. Looking forward to the variety of results.
#106
19th December 2012
Old 19th December 2012
  #106
Lives for gear
 
engmix's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,358
My Recordings/Credits

engmix is offline
Mix for Mastering Throw Down

Ok, i have the demo ready to go. How do i upload a hi res stereo file (24bits 44.1k) into the forum.
Hermetech Mastering
Verified Member
#107
19th December 2012
Old 19th December 2012
  #107
Lives for gear
 
Hermetech Mastering's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Location: Milan

Verified Member
Hermetech Mastering is offline
That would be great!
#108
19th December 2012
Old 19th December 2012
  #108
Lives for gear
 
Laurend's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Location: France
Posts: 670

Laurend is offline
I'm in too
#109
19th December 2012
Old 19th December 2012
  #109
Lives for gear
 
engmix's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,358
My Recordings/Credits

engmix is offline
Ok, i have the demo ready to go. How do i upload a hi res stereo file (24bits 44.1k) into the forum.
#110
19th December 2012
Old 19th December 2012
  #110
Lives for gear
 
baskervils's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 1,607
My Recordings/Credits

baskervils is offline
I'm sure that someone probably already said this, but pushing tape hard makes a tune sound louder than just dropping it digitally. Tape compression!
Riccardo
Verified Member
#111
19th December 2012
Old 19th December 2012
  #111
Mastering Moderator
 
Riccardo's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: Always on the Run
Posts: 3,234

Verified Member
Riccardo is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by engmix View Post
Ok, i have the demo ready to go. How do i upload a hi res stereo file (24bits 44.1k) into the forum.
It depends how big it is, up to 9 megs via the attachment manage option.
__________________
Velvet Room Mastering



"Can you imagine how great the Beatles or Pink Floyd could have sounded if they had used better cables?

I expect a Nobel prize to someday be awarded to an audiophile cable designer, as they clearly are way ahead of the rest of us.
" - DC -
Hermetech Mastering
Verified Member
#112
19th December 2012
Old 19th December 2012
  #112
Lives for gear
 
Hermetech Mastering's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Location: Milan

Verified Member
Hermetech Mastering is offline
I'm sure it's gonna be bigger than 9MB if it's a 24bit 1 minute snippet. I'd be happy to host it, but only for one week. Should be time enough for all who want to be involved to download it. Let me know if I can help out. Is there no way you could put it on WeTransfer.com and send links to people who send you their email addresses? Not sure if that's doable, but another possible option.
#113
19th December 2012
Old 19th December 2012
  #113
Lives for gear
 
Laurend's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Location: France
Posts: 670

Laurend is offline
Any free file sharing service can do the trick. Once the upload done, you just have to share here the download link.
I love this one because of its nice pictures.
https://www.wetransfer.com
__________________
Laurent Sevestre
www.maximalsound.com
Online Mastering
Technical Stuff
Hermetech Mastering
Verified Member
#114
19th December 2012
Old 19th December 2012
  #114
Lives for gear
 
Hermetech Mastering's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Location: Milan

Verified Member
Hermetech Mastering is offline
yeah but i think with wetransfer you can't just provide a link, you need email addresses of recipients. might be wrong though...
#115
19th December 2012
Old 19th December 2012
  #115
Lives for gear
 
engmix's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,358
My Recordings/Credits

engmix is offline
I generated a link from my yousendit account.

And i think no one should post their mastering until this Friday or Saturday, giving everyone a few days to get it done. I want to avoid setting any kind of benchmark to reference from, so everyone is flying on their own jet so to speak.

Remember, this is a production demo, rock on with your bad selves.

The audio file is 24bit 44.1 Aiff

https://www.yousendit.com/download/W...QVM5NVUxWjhUQw


By the way, i have to say this whether you like the song or not. This song is under copyright with BMI, and is the sole property of Waxmusic publishing. No one is permitted to copy this song for resale or any other reason without my written consent, for all territories on Earth.
Hermetech Mastering
Verified Member
#116
19th December 2012
Old 19th December 2012
  #116
Lives for gear
 
Hermetech Mastering's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Location: Milan

Verified Member
Hermetech Mastering is offline
thanks, downloading now!
#117
19th December 2012
Old 19th December 2012
  #117
Lives for gear
 
engmix's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,358
My Recordings/Credits

engmix is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Babaluma View Post
thanks, downloading now!
Cool, and obviously there are no strict rules, but i think you guys should give it a few days before you post your work...this way others wont be able to use your work as a benchmark to strive for and beyond.
#118
20th December 2012
Old 20th December 2012
  #118
Lives for gear
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,324

OpusOfTrolls is offline
Yeah, okay, but what is the delivery medium? I am just going to assume 320kbps mp3
#119
20th December 2012
Old 20th December 2012
  #119
Lives for gear
 
Jesse Graffam's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,149

Jesse Graffam is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by OpusOfTrolls View Post
Yeah, okay, but what is the delivery medium? I am just going to assume 320kbps mp3
It should be lossless only. lossy codecs don't maintain peak control.
Quote
1
#120
20th December 2012
Old 20th December 2012
  #120
Lives for gear
 
engmix's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,358
My Recordings/Credits

engmix is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse Graffam View Post
It should be lossless only. lossy codecs don't maintain peak control.
agreed...
Quote
1
New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn  Submit Thread to Google+ Google+ 
 
Topic:
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter / Forum
Replies
reclude / Mastering forum
10
ceco / So much gear, so little time!
58
Samsonite / Post Production forum!
17
NoisyNarrowBand / So much gear, so little time!
18

Forum Jump

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.